Conquer Club

how, just because I take offense to being called scum? If it's not a wild assumption, explain your reasoning as my only posts up to that point were to sign-up, confirm and vote for someone to get the ball rolling.

I was pointing out that you said I was "wildly accusing scum" rather than "wildly accusing you" (of being scum), this indicates the subject is "scum".
Anyways I'm just kidding, which is totally being ruined by having to explain it to you. I know there's no evidence, but it's more entertaining for me to vote than to lurk.

actually I found it was more accurate to say wildly accusing scum as it is less words(and thus less work) than saying wildly accusing me and edocsil(which is what you were doing or so I interpreted)

/ wrote:I was pointing out that you said I was "wildly accusing scum" rather than "wildly accusing you" (of being scum), this indicates the subject is "scum".
Anyways I'm just kidding, which is totally being ruined by having to explain it to you. I know there's no evidence, but it's more entertaining for me to vote than to lurk.

So was your edocsil vote a joke from the beginning or are you just saying that to get me off your back.

Jace22 wrote:how, just because I take offense to being called scum? If it's not a wild assumption, explain your reasoning as my only posts up to that point were to sign-up, confirm and vote for someone to get the ball rolling.

Jace, your actions reek of OMGUS and buddying. You got accused and then all of a sudden you became very defensive and hostile despite the fact that you weren't the one voted. I can only think of a few reasons why you would come to the defense so readily of edocsil (who was much more threatened than you). Off of your few posts I can already make a case against you if I so choose. Watch your words.

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

/ wrote:vote edocsil I could go into a rant about the start of a game having no info and pointless bandwagons being the only way to advance in many cases, but that's cliche.

Well then let this argument become cliche because I disagree. edocsil's actions seemed a little odd but not inappropriate to me and your response is fairly harsh over a single vote. Especially the insinuation that edocsil and jace are scumbuddies. This is fairly wild speculation if I am to be any judge.

If another player would have done this it would not have bothered me, I would know it to be calculated and reasoned. When he does it after 4(ish) votes in a game I wonder why. I assume it is just a joke, but what if one scum places a vote? We are at L-1 already. A bandwagon like that is fine in a 12 to 16 man game, be here? Far too much pressure. A simple FoS would not suffice to show my opinion on the vote.

sensfan wrote:sorry, personlasio reasonio.
no interneto acceso untilo nowo.

conformio

I likio bandio wagoningio soio io

voto jacio

Vote sensfans for his butchered Italian

edocsil wrote: We are at L-1 already.

No we're not.
I'd like to call this an "over-reaction".

FoS Edoc

VioIet wrote:

sensfan wrote:sorry, personlasio reasonio.
no interneto acceso untilo nowo.

conformio

I likio bandio wagoningio soio io

voto jacio

Vote sensfans for his butchered Italian

Takio thatio! Andio thatio!

is it 5 or 6 to lynch?

if 5, im at L-2!

No more Italiano now!:

Edoscil, you do this every game I play with you, you have no sense of humor and manage to lynch someone with that joke. You are even town on these occaisions. I think that when I vote a joke vote you think im dead-serious and vote for me. This time, you've gone too far. Even though you could be town, I'm going to put one toe across the line and vote:

unvote. VOTE EDOSCIL

And lay off 'slash'. He was trying to joke.,

sensfan wrote:is it 5 or 6 to lynch?

if 5, im at L-2!

No more Italiano now!:

Edoscil, you do this every game I play with you, you have no sense of humor and manage to lynch someone with that joke. You are even town on these occaisions. I think that when I vote a joke vote you think im dead-serious and vote for me. This time, you've gone too far. Even though you could be town, I'm going to put one toe across the line and vote:

unvote. VOTE EDOSCIL

I don't mean to be interrupting your I-am-right-speech, but every time you joke vote, you joke vote on a bandwagon. It's just fishy. Edocsil might be overreacting, but he certainly has a point. FoS Sensfan as well.

Lynching rules: In my game I use the majority of all alive players as a lynch, so with 10 people 6 are needed to lynch, but if there were 11 people you would also need 6 people to lynch.

CONTEGGIO di VOTO.

Squirrel: Victor Sullivan (1)
Sensfan : cena, edocsil, violet (3)
VioIet : Squirrel (1)
Jace : aage (1)
edocsil: slash, sensfan(2)
slash: jace (1)

not voting: Colton

aage wrote:

edocsil wrote: We are at L-1 already.

No we're not.
I'd like to call this an "over-reaction".

FoS Edoc

Sorry if my post was unclear, what I said was

edocsil wrote: but what if one scum places a vote? We are at L-1 already.

What I tried to say is scum could easily attempt to force town power role to claim for no reason at all. Is that a good thing? (I hope I did my math right, would be the first time I have made a mistake though it was L-2)

I do this sens because every time because you act like this so often. You start large bandwagons with absolutely no reason on D1. Joke votes are just that, small votes against people for funny reasons. Not a bunch of random votes against one person.

On a side not you comments of my lack of humor amuse me, as it is certainly not the first time I have heard that.

ok, maybe i was overreacting. but my vote stays on ed.
'No more random Bandwagoning.' Promised

sensfan wrote:ok, maybe i was overreacting. but my vote stays on ed.
'No more random Bandwagoning.' Promised

Edocsil gains a following and now you decide to back down? To me this is scummier than your original bandwagoning. You were very aggressive back at edocsil at first and now that it seems that the town agrees with him, you recoil and make empty promises. I dislike jace's actions earlier, but yours are even worse right now. vote sens

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

sensfan wrote:ok, maybe i was overreacting. but my vote stays on ed.
'No more random Bandwagoning.' Promised

Edocsil gains a following and now you decide to back down? To me this is scummier than your original bandwagoning. You were very aggressive back at edocsil at first and now that it seems that the town agrees with him, you recoil and make empty promises. I dislike jace's actions earlier, but yours are even worse right now. vote sens

I'm playing the way I play. I back down because you'll lynch me. And so what do you want me to do now? Roleclaim?

sensfan wrote:

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

sensfan wrote:ok, maybe i was overreacting. but my vote stays on ed.
'No more random Bandwagoning.' Promised

Edocsil gains a following and now you decide to back down? To me this is scummier than your original bandwagoning. You were very aggressive back at edocsil at first and now that it seems that the town agrees with him, you recoil and make empty promises. I dislike jace's actions earlier, but yours are even worse right now. vote sens

I'm playing the way I play. I back down because you'll lynch me. And so what do you want me to do now? Roleclaim?

Yes, sens. That's what you do when you're close to being lynched What is he at now, L-2?

sensfan wrote:

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

sensfan wrote:ok, maybe i was overreacting. but my vote stays on ed.
'No more random Bandwagoning.' Promised

Edocsil gains a following and now you decide to back down? To me this is scummier than your original bandwagoning. You were very aggressive back at edocsil at first and now that it seems that the town agrees with him, you recoil and make empty promises. I dislike jace's actions earlier, but yours are even worse right now. vote sens

I'm playing the way I play. I back down because you'll lynch me.

Backing down is not the only way to lose votes. If your point of view is just as valid, you should be able to argue back. Backing down concedes defeat and puts you in the wrong. You are basically accepting your scummy behavior and hoping we will just forget about it. Whereas if you are arguing back it shows that you are confident, since you are town after all, and how your intentions were just as 'towny' as anyone else. While all of this isn't cannon scumtells, they are all things that I have noticed in the past and I am willing to pursue when I see them.

sensfan wrote:And so what do you want me to do now? Roleclaim?

Do whatever you want. You're the one in danger here.

FOS Colton for suspiciously not being around.

CONTEGGIO di VOTO.

Squirrel: Victor Sullivan (1)
Sensfan : cena, edocsil, violet , squirrel (4 ) L - 2
Jace : aage (1)
edocsil: slash, sensfan(2)
slash: jace (1)

not voting: Colton

unvote vote colton

You're still in this game dude... Not being around but being able to post in other threads is not something I like.

Unvote sens

Jeez, I leave a thread and someone almost gets lynched


*mutters in strong Italian*

cena-rules wrote:Unvote sens

Jeez, I leave a thread and someone almost gets lynched


*mutters in strong Italian*

Meh, you did read his "logic" right? We can fish around for a while today, but I don't think we are going to find someone more scummy. Unless we talk a look at the submariners, *Cough*Colton*Cough*

unvote (sadly) vote colton. Even if you are town, you're not saying sh*t.

I'm Palmino, the town commuter. I can be immune to any night actions directed toward me, but not two nights in a row.