Page 3 of 5
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 4]
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:40 am
by Sir. Ricco
All aboard. Destination: Level 4.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 4]
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:29 pm
by denominator
Highly doubt it'll be the quickest, but defeated Bones in 9 in
Game 6349149.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 4]
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:46 am
by Sir. Ricco
denominator wrote:Highly doubt it'll be the quickest, but defeated Bones in 9 in
Game 6349149.
Actually, I know its not.
Game 6349145 - danryan vs. aligator_al, round 7.

Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 4]
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:23 pm
by biscuit boy
And it looks like Biscuit Boy is going out in Round 6.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 4]
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:56 am
by Sir. Ricco
biscuit boy wrote:And it looks like Biscuit Boy is going out in Round 6.
You have two games below you right now, but there still active.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 4]
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:07 am
by Sir. Ricco
biscuit boy wrote:And it looks like Biscuit Boy is going out in Round 6.
Looks like all the games are going to be over 6 rounds, I think its the end for another past champion.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 5]
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:51 pm
by Sir. Ricco
Level 5 started! Get to your games.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 5]
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:13 am
by danryan
Game 6377007 3 rounds. Sorry about the dice, spidey.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 5]
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:15 pm
by Sir. Ricco
danryan wrote:Game 6377007 3 rounds. Sorry about the dice, spidey.
Wow, that was fast.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 5]
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:11 pm
by Kinnison
Thank god, I *might* survive longer than that. denominator has been eating me up, but it's R3, so he can't nuke yet, and I have a LOT of troops in my small area.

Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 5]
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:25 am
by Sir. Ricco
It's offical, with both games over three rounds spidey is eliminated. danryan gets the bye level.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 6]
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:55 am
by Sir. Ricco
Level 6 started. Get to your games.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 6]
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:19 am
by HighlanderAttack
I think I survived the longest game:
6349140 Round 27
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 6]
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:44 am
by Sir. Ricco
HighlanderAttack wrote:I think I survived the longest game:
6349140 Round 27
That was epic. How many nukes do you use.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 6]
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 6:59 pm
by Kinnison
Game 6397539Tourney Round 6, Kinnison d. HighlanderAttack in 4.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 6]
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:36 pm
by Sir. Ricco
Kinnison wrote:Game 6397539Tourney Round 6, Kinnison d. HighlanderAttack in 4.
We could have another tie. One game in round 3.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 7]
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:29 am
by Sir. Ricco
There is a three way tie between:
Kinnison beats HighlanderAttack in 4
aligator_al beats Bones2484 in 4
barterer2002 beats adam666 in 4
Let the tie breaker begin:
1. Amount of eliminations of winner, most eliminates losers
(Kinnison: 1 | aligator_al: 0 | barterer2002: 0 | HighlanderAttack is eliminated)
2. Amount of eliminations, less is eliminated
(Not Needed)
3. Record of the losers, worst record is eliminated
(Not Needed)
4. Record of the winners, best record eliminates loser
(Not Needed)
5. Review of head to head match ups of the losers
(Not Needed)
6. Tie breaker game
(Not Needed)
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 7]
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:30 am
by Sir. Ricco
Level 7 started. Get to your games!
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 7]
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:22 am
by Sir. Ricco
With all games over 6 rounds, looks like danryan has been eliminated.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 8]
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:31 am
by Sir. Ricco
Level 8 started. Only 9 players left!
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 8]
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:43 am
by Kinnison
I apologize to all and sundry for needing replacements for the last 5-6 days... It seems that MGM didn't insure good cell coverage in their newest properties. My iPhone spent almost all of my vegas vacation being a pretty brick.

Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 8]
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:53 pm
by Sir. Ricco
adam666 has been eliminated for Level 8. jug68 beat him is 3 rounds, and since all other games are above 3 rounds, adam666 is eliminated.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 9]
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:05 pm
by Sir. Ricco
Level 9 started. Half the players that started the tournament remain.
Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 9]
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:36 am
by jug68
I win in Game 6447538

Re: Mission - Survive the Longest V1.4 [Nuclear] [Level 9]
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:18 pm
by barterer2002
In case of a tie between the quickest eliminated players, the following system will be applied:
1. Amount of eliminations of winner, most eliminates losers
2. Amount of eliminations of loser, less is eliminated
3. Record of the losers, worst record is eliminated
4. Record of the winners, best record eliminates loser
5. Review of head to head match ups of the losers
6. Tie breaker game
trying to understand this Ricco.
Let's compare Bones and myself for Round 9 since we both went out in Round 4
As I read it
1). whoever has eliminated the most players advances-neither of us have eliminated anyone
2) (I don't understand what this is if its different than number 1)
3). Whoever has more wins advances-so in this seniaro I have 5 to Bones' 1 so I'd advance.
4). (Again, I'm not sure how this would be different than number 3)