Page 191 of 267

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 4:48 pm
by Army of GOD
xeno wrote:
natty dread wrote:
i can't believe i actually have to explain to you guys why it's wrong to f*ck kids

i mean are you braindead or something

no one here is trying to f*ck any kid. just visualizing fucking them to get that nut


I would f*ck them

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 5:25 pm
by Haggis_McMutton
Army of GOD wrote:
xeno wrote:
natty dread wrote:
i can't believe i actually have to explain to you guys why it's wrong to f*ck kids

i mean are you braindead or something

no one here is trying to f*ck any kid. just visualizing fucking them to get that nut


I would f*ck them


Image


But seriously, disregarding everything else, you think it's worth the legal risk?

And @natty. I'm somewhat surprised you're taking such a hardline position on this. I don't really see the harm in people having their fantasies as long as they are fantasies and no one is hurt in producing said fantasies.

For instance, would you be against a full fledged pedophile jerking off to hentai involving 3 year olds ? What about if doing that is helping him control his urges to actually enact that fantasy?

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 6:04 pm
by nietzsche
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 6:36 pm
by Army of GOD
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
xeno wrote:
natty dread wrote:
i can't believe i actually have to explain to you guys why it's wrong to f*ck kids

i mean are you braindead or something

no one here is trying to f*ck any kid. just visualizing fucking them to get that nut


I would f*ck them


Image


But seriously, disregarding everything else, you think it's worth the legal risk?

And @natty. I'm somewhat surprised you're taking such a hardline position on this. I don't really see the harm in people having their fantasies as long as they are fantasies and no one is hurt in producing said fantasies.

For instance, would you be against a full fledged pedophile jerking off to hentai involving 3 year olds ? What about if doing that is helping him control his urges to actually enact that fantasy?


I said that sort of in jest. I wouldn't irl if I knew she was under the age of consent, but if I didn't have to worry about that, I would probably tap dat shiz.

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 11:24 pm
by natty dread
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
And @natty. I'm somewhat surprised you're taking such a hardline position on this. I don't really see the harm in people having their fantasies as long as they are fantasies and no one is hurt in producing said fantasies.

For instance, would you be against a full fledged pedophile jerking off to hentai involving 3 year olds ? What about if doing that is helping him control his urges to actually enact that fantasy?


It's totally different, if it's hentai or other drawings then it's fine by me - there's no real people being harmed, and maybe if those pedophiles are allowed to fap off to hentai they'll stay away from real kiddie porn.

If you had a 14-year old daughter, and someone took "sexy" pictures of her and put them online, would you be just fine with it?

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 11:41 pm
by xeno
natty dread wrote:
If you had a 14-year old daughter, and someone took "sexy" pictures of her and put them online, would you be just fine with it?

natty maybe you didn't grow up in the internet age, but these chicks put some surprisingly slutty things on their facebooks and myspaces by their own free will.

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 11:42 pm
by natty dread
xeno wrote:
natty dread wrote:
If you had a 14-year old daughter, and someone took "sexy" pictures of her and put them online, would you be just fine with it?

natty maybe you didn't grow up in the internet age, but these chicks put some surprisingly slutty things on their facebooks and myspaces by their own free will.


It doesn't matter, you idiot.

If you had a 14-year old daughter, and she took "sexy" pictures of herself and put them online, would you be just fine with it?

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 11:45 pm
by xeno
natty dread wrote:
xeno wrote:
natty dread wrote:
If you had a 14-year old daughter, and someone took "sexy" pictures of her and put them online, would you be just fine with it?

natty maybe you didn't grow up in the internet age, but these chicks put some surprisingly slutty things on their facebooks and myspaces by their own free will.


It doesn't matter, you idiot.

If you had a 14-year old daughter, and she took "sexy" pictures of herself and put them online, would you be just fine with it?

HAHA thats a different story. My 14 year old daughter would never see the light of day if she ever ventured onto teh internetz

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 11:49 pm
by whitestazn88
stop posting pictures of her from when she was under 18 you sick bastards. I'm with NatDre on this one.

Post pics of her now! she's legal!

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:06 am
by Army of GOD
Your "WUT IF YOU HAZ DAUGHTER?" question is utterly ridiculous on 2 accounts natty(_)dread. (1) I doubt Haggis, xeno have daughters so they probably won't be able to make a accurate conclusion based on their lack of experience with children, especially female children (which I don't either) and (2) what the f*ck does the parents' feeling about the daughter being a slut have to do with this any way? I know parents that want their 20-something daughters not to do this (including mine), what does any of this have to do with them being pedophiles? Appealing to emotion again, I presume.

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:15 am
by natty dread
Army of GOD wrote: what the f*ck does the parents' feeling about the daughter being a slut


Really now, slut? You call underage girls sluts? Classy.

Besides that, your post is full of logical fallacies and plain stupidity, so I'm not even going to bother responding to it... this is getting boring anyway, you're just going to trot out the same old boring Army of god-isms and shit about how nothing is really anything because you've read a 101 on moral philosophy or some shit -

Go wank at kiddyporn on reddit or whatever, just keep that shit away from here

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:17 am
by Army of GOD
natty dread wrote:
Army of GOD wrote: what the f*ck does the parents' feeling about the daughter being a slut


Really now, slut? You call underage girls sluts? Classy.

Besides that, your post is full of logical fallacies and plain stupidity, so I'm not even going to bother responding to it... this is getting boring anyway, you're just going to trot out the same old boring Army of god-isms and shit about how nothing is really anything because you've read a 101 on moral philosophy or some shit -

Go wank at kiddyporn on reddit or whatever, just keep that shit away from here


I love you

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:22 am
by Gillipig
natty dread wrote:
Army of GOD wrote: what the f*ck does the parents' feeling about the daughter being a slut


Really now, slut? You call underage girls sluts? Classy.

Besides that, your post is full of logical fallacies and plain stupidity, so I'm not even going to bother responding to it... this is getting boring anyway, you're just going to trot out the same old boring Army of god-isms and shit about how nothing is really anything because you've read a 101 on moral philosophy or some shit -

Go wank at kiddyporn on reddit or whatever, just keep that shit away from here

You're so defensive about this whole thing I'm willing to betting you fap to child porn all the time! Maybe you're even a child molester!! Natty is every childs dread :)!

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:32 am
by natty dread
[bigimg]http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/7634/screenshotfrom201205240.png[/bigimg]

classy.

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:36 am
by nietzsche
Image

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:39 am
by nietzsche
Image

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 8:55 am
by AndyDufresne
Image


--Andy

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:18 am
by 2dimes
Grow up you two. This is no place for you to post your smut... Oh.

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:33 pm
by betiko
nietzsche, aog and xeno; what if you have a really fit 14 years old daughter, would it be ok to have some wanks thinking about doing her? and would it be ok when she turns 18?

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:55 pm
by Ace Rimmer
Image

Image

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 6:21 pm
by Army of GOD
betiko wrote:nietzsche, aog and xeno; what if you have a really fit 14 years old daughter, would it be ok to have some wanks thinking about doing her? and would it be ok when she turns 18?


duh

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 6:49 pm
by nietzsche
betiko wrote:nietzsche, aog and xeno; what if you have a really fit 14 years old daughter, would it be ok to have some wanks thinking about doing her? and would it be ok when she turns 18?


betiko, me extrania de ti

natty was just trolling us. xeno posted the pic, out of genuine lust for that girl, as I learned a bit that girl is just an "attention whore" as he put it, apparently she posted pictures of her with little clothes and to my believe photoshopped and accepted whoever wanted to be his friend in myspace, basically she was creating a cult for her. xeno himself is not much older than her, and it was just normal to like her.

basically later aog and me and xeno were just replying to natty's messages.

he is not really concerned with pedophilia, as much as he is not concerned with dieting or just anything, he just want to win arguments in every thread possible. he holds the absolute truth, the moral highstand, everything, he will find your logical fallacies and belittle you with them, and then he will make commit the same.

pedophilia is a BIG problem, there is a natural concern about it, but it's likely that it's blown out of proportion. "how can you say that" will the answer of many, and I will repeat that I don't believe it's not important, in fact you should teach your children to be vigilant of it, but it's more like the concern in vogue among parents. it awakens a natural social anxiety in us, therefore we like to talk about the topic, but it's like women gossiping, have you heard them? all they say about other women omg.

anyway, nothig wrong was happening here, was just business as usual we having fun, when natty came a created a big fuss out of nothing.

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:54 am
by natty dread
Nietzsche, that's the argument of the idiot - "you don't really believe what you say, you're just arguing because...." bluh bluh blah blah.

You don't want to be an idiot, do you?

Oh wait, you defend pedophiles and probably are one - never mind.

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 3:42 am
by TeeGee
Can we drop the subject now please and get back on topic :)

Re: HOT + SEXY + nsfw(women only as per OP)

Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 8:44 am
by Gillipig
TeeGee wrote:Can we drop the subject now please and get back on topic :)

But this was just starting to get fun :(!