Page 20 of 27

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:42 am
by cairnswk
Congrats Rj....fine map! :) Should be some good battles on this one. Looking forward to playing it.

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:06 am
by RjBeals
Thanks all! Sweet. This map was really fun to make, and I think it's pretty unique from other maps on the site. Let the dust storms begin!

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:08 am
by yeti_c
Hey congrats RJ...

C.

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:15 am
by rebelman
well done, look forward to playing it.

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:10 pm
by militant
Congrats RJ, you need to change your sig now :wink:

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:12 pm
by ParadiceCity9
chicka chicka yeah yeah!

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:28 pm
by RjBeals
militant wrote:Congrats RJ, you need to change your sig now :wink:


AHH Yeahh.. :P

That's 2 years of free premium membership baby!

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:29 pm
by RjBeals
ParadiceCity9 wrote:chicka chicka yeah yeah!


And Rust in Peace is one of the greatest metal albums of all time. And so is that Jason Becker album (air is amazing!)

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:11 pm
by unriggable
Rj, you are now a multimapper. Gj, Rj.

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:04 am
by gimil
congratz RJ another fine piece of art by yourself :)

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:25 am
by yeti_c
You may need to change your continents...

Anything that was written <component> is now <territory>

Note you can also use <continent> in your components if your logic needs it!!

C.

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:51 pm
by RjBeals
yeti_c wrote:You may need to change your continents...

Anything that was written <component> is now <territory>

Note you can also use <continent> in your components if your logic needs it!!

C.


Hmm.. okay. So I can do a find / replace changing "component" to "territory" ?

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:10 pm
by yeti_c
RjBeals wrote:
yeti_c wrote:You may need to change your continents...

Anything that was written <component> is now <territory>

Note you can also use <continent> in your components if your logic needs it!!

C.


Hmm.. okay. So I can do a find / replace changing "component" to "territory" ?


Yep - do find and replace on component> to territory>

And that will sort it...

C.

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:58 pm
by Incandenza
Congrats, RJ. This is a terrific looking map. Now get cracking on Iceland! :lol:

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:53 pm
by Fireside Poet
I've just completed my first RT game on this map and all I can say is WOW - fantastic work, RJBeals. Instant favorite. =D>

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:56 pm
by RjBeals
Is the below revised code correct? Should It be territories or territorys or remain components?

Code changed from:

Code: Select all

   <continent>
      <name>Nebraska</name>
      <bonus>2</bonus>
      <components>
         <component>North Platte</component>
         <component>Norfolk</component>
         <component>Imperial</component>
         <component>Lincoln</component>
         
      </components>
   </continent>


To now...

Code: Select all

   <continent>
      <name>Nebraska</name>
      <bonus>2</bonus>
      <territorys>
         <territory>North Platte</territory>
         <territory>Norfolk</territory>
         <territory>Imperial</territory>
         <territory>Lincoln</territory>
         
      </territorys>
   </continent>
   <continent>


If that is not correct, let me know. Thanks all.

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:01 pm
by lanyards
It should still say <components> and after it should still say </components>.

--lanyards

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:04 pm
by RjBeals
cool...

Here is what it looks like now. thanks lanyards

Code: Select all

   <continent>
      <name>Nebraska</name>
      <bonus>2</bonus>
      <components>
         <territory>North Platte</territory>
         <territory>Norfolk</territory>
         <territory>Imperial</territory>
         <territory>Lincoln</territory>
         
      </components>
   </continent>
   <continent>
      <name>Colorado</name>
      <bonus>4</bonus>
      <components>
         <territory>Craig</territory>
         <territory>Grand Junction</territory>
         <territory>Denver</territory>
         <territory>Sterling</territory>
         <territory>San Luis Valley</territory>
         <territory>Lamar</territory>
      </components>
   </continent>



Here is the link to the updated xml:

http://www.rjbeals.com/dustbowl/newxml/dustbowl.xml

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:25 pm
by RjBeals
1645045
gimil wrote:2008-01-22 01:10:53 - gimil: nope rjbeals :)
2008-01-22 01:11:08 - gimil: me and colemans maps are much better :P
2008-01-22 01:11:16 - gimil: and more complicated :P:P


err.. cough cough... now gimil. I hope that said with love.

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:41 pm
by RjBeals
RjBeals wrote:
gimil wrote:***drum roll***

Such love for my man gimil


:wink:

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:45 pm
by gimil
I come bearing the news that Dustbowl it a success, not only does it look beautiful, it also palys beautiful.

do i say it? no i shouldnt . . . maybe i will. . . oh hell . . . ill say it!!!

Its better than sex!!!!!

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:52 pm
by RjBeals
gimil wrote:I come bearing the news that Dustbowl it a success, not only does it look beautiful, it also palys beautiful.

do i say it? no i shouldnt . . . maybe i will. . . oh hell . . . ill say it!!!

Its better than sex!!!!!


:shock:

Wow. Now thats a quote! Thanks gimil. But you should maybe take a break from cc and get out a little more :wink:

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:53 pm
by gimil
RjBeals wrote:
gimil wrote:I come bearing the news that Dustbowl it a success, not only does it look beautiful, it also palys beautiful.

do i say it? no i shouldnt . . . maybe i will. . . oh hell . . . ill say it!!!

Its better than sex!!!!!


:shock:

Wow. Now thats a quote! Thanks gimil. But you should maybe take a break from cc and get out a little more :wink:


Listen, ive got my prioroties straight :wink:

Thats why the girlfriend had to go . . . .

no ocean south of las cruces

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:35 pm
by mbs
not sure if anyone else mentioned this... but:

the only thing i can see wrong with DUST BOWL is that there's no big body of water south of las cruces like what is depicted. it's just mexico down there...

Re: no ocean south of las cruces

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:40 pm
by InkL0sed
mbs wrote:not sure if anyone else mentioned this... but:

the only thing i can see wrong with DUST BOWL is that there's no big body of water south of las cruces like what is depicted. it's just mexico down there...


You have a point, but I don't think it's supposed to water. Probably just dead space.

It's still a valid point even my assertion is true, because it does at least look like water.