Conquer Club

I'm #confusednotboozed

Well EW you need to come clean on who visited me because in my view you are full of it. No one visited me, so either you are trying to bluff that you have some important role oirsome one is pulling the wool over your eyes.
Watch my typing...no one visited me.

Loose Canon wrote:I'm #confusednotboozed

Scum is driving relaxed in the driver's seat knowing town lost JK and the uncounterclaimed cop is already cornered.

That in mind does EW sounds relaxed / or is in a calmly playing chess state of mind to you?

Thats why im having him town.

FP by Halrob

In other words : EW is playing like i want town to play today because we need to win in the daytime, so that means pushing harder.

@Rag: do you still want us gently steering the barge of logic sailing inquisitively through town? Or do you wanna step things up knowing its 7vs4 with big chance of 2 scum kills a night?

SoN!c wrote: EW is scumhunting and townhunting at the same time.

One who hunt scums & townies at the same time remind me a WereWolf, Serial Killer or an Alien

SoN!c wrote:

Loose Canon wrote:I'm #confusednotboozed

Scum is driving relaxed in the driver's seat knowing town lost JK and the uncounterclaimed cop is already cornered.

That in mind does EW sounds relaxed / or is in a calmly playing chess state of mind to you?

Thats why im having him town.

FP by Halrob

FP by Halrob means ?
Fair Play ?
Foul Play ?
Fun Play ?
or ?

@Rag

Yes I did throw shade at you and I'll explain.

Of the players I know, you and Sonic ticked my likely town boxes early on D1.
Of the players I don't know, Chana ticked my likely town box early on D1.
Of everyone else all bar EW and Halrob to some (lesser than you 3) extent ticked likely town boxes early D1.
That leaves me a problem of nowhere to go.

I don't mind throwing some shade at likely towns to see where it goes.

Early D2 after Charle posted D2 open and the 2 deaths I browsed and no-one had posted a reaction, when I went back 2 or 3 times still no-one had posted a reaction.
I thought someone has to post something, fine I'll post to kick things off - but what do I post?
I thought about who had died and thought OK I'll post something and included something about who as a mafia version of themselves would most want to top off Kong.
Against that criteria and genuinely because I think you are most similar to Kong I thought well that would be you.

It was feeble if you like (and I admit), day2 icebreaking.

FPd (FAST POSTED) by Chana

chanakam2020 wrote:

SoN!c wrote:

Loose Canon wrote:I'm #confusednotboozed

Scum is driving relaxed in the driver's seat knowing town lost JK and the uncounterclaimed cop is already cornered.

That in mind does EW sounds relaxed / or is in a calmly playing chess state of mind to you?

Thats why im having him town.

FP by Halrob

FP by Halrob means ?
Fair Play ?
Foul Play ?
Fun Play ?
or ?

fastposted. Written before someone else posted.

Extreme Ways wrote:

SoN!c wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:I was unfortunately not drunk yesterday. I do have some info on what happened during the night, which is why I went rolefishing.

In my head, there's a couple hypothetical scenarios that I havent unpacked yet:
- We have multiple investigative roles
- We have multiple protective roles

We have 1 cop claim, and 1 protective death (jailkeeper). Games tend to run on a bit of a higher level, and I think Darin knew well enough that protecting Halrob isn't worth the tradeoff since we can't confirm claim.

I am an investigative role of some sort. I have information on someone having visited Halrob. I'm curious if that person who I will not yet name but have named two people for (Ragian/Sonic) is a protective role, or a mafia roleblocker role.

Rag, I skimmed my own posts for you. Nothing in this section says that JK dies upon succesfully protecting. I just mentioned the tradeoff that protecting someone also blocks them. I did miss a word in the quote, that being "power". Games tend to run on a bit of a higher power level.

"There was a jailkeeper deah. Usually a jailkeeper protects but also dies."

One of your "non drunken" ramblings like getting the quote brackets wrong inserting half a game number bracket in it!.. if you want i will post that half game number bracket here too. Im still wondering how you'd managed to do that IF not drunk

TIpsy, not drunk!

But yeah, I meant roleblocks. Oops.

Still a bit psyched out that Rag shades me for that, then. Maybe he knows I'm onto him?

You're on to me? For seemingly trying to misrepresent a role? How is that on me?

SoN!c wrote:In other words : EW is playing like i want town to play today because we need to win in the daytime, so that means pushing harder.

@Rag: do you still want us gently steering the barge of logic sailing inquisitively through town? Or do you wanna step things up knowing its 7vs4 with big chance of 2 scum kills a night?

Stepping things up has nothing to do with abandoning logic. You also know where I stand. There was a list yesterday. Not much has changed.

@Loose, if your comment - apart from being very farfetched - was insincere, at least you've managed to roll out EW who thinks he's "on to me" despite (intentionally) misrepresenting a role and then (intentionally) suggesting that what I read didn't exist.

halrob64 wrote:Well EW you need to come clean on who visited me because in my view you are full of it. No one visited me, so either you are trying to bluff that you have some important role oirsome one is pulling the wool over your eyes.
Watch my typing...no one visited me.

Players, town nor scum, do not know whether they are visited or not.

If someone performed a night action, they will know whether it was successful or not. It would be overpowered for anyone to know that a cop targeted them, right? Or for scum to know that someone targeted them, but that it was most likely a protective role.

There are specific roles to check who is visiting others. One of them is a Watcher, who sees everyone who visits the chosen player. Another is Tracker, who tracks where someone is going with their night action. A third is Motion Detector, who knows whether someone was visiting or visited.

FP'd by Rag - I dont see how I "intentionally" misrepresent a role and that is entirely your conclusion. I "mistakenly" misrepresented a role, and didnt even notice until Sonic quoted me. I have also "intentionally" not-misrepresented the same role. Tell me how it's part of an agenda?

"Helpful EW is scum EW"

ok apparently me helping out is scummy to people here.

When I make typing mistakes I'm also scummy, so "unhelpful EW = also scum EW".

The only town EW is AFK EW?

Rag, did you or did you not visit Halrob last night?

There are roles Tracker and Scout.
There are role Werewolf (failed or not).
There are role Traitor.

They are all important to contemplate due to actions made the first night.

Extreme Ways wrote:"Helpful EW is scum EW"

ok apparently me helping out is scummy to people here.

When I make typing mistakes I'm also scummy, so "unhelpful EW = also scum EW".

The only town EW is AFK EW?

Rag, did you or did you not visit Halrob last night?

Did you count how many Mistakes you did ?
Typing Mistakes.
Vote counting mistakes
Post missing mistakes

Making so many mistakes does not make you a Good Boy

It couldn't been a werewolf visiting halrob if halrob was jailed. Then we had known since a failed action from a werewolf.

If Rag was jailed then Rag couldn't visit halrob

Extreme Ways wrote:"Helpful EW is scum EW"

ok apparently me helping out is scummy to people here.

When I make typing mistakes I'm also scummy, so "unhelpful EW = also scum EW".

The only town EW is AFK EW?

Rag, did you or did you not visit Halrob last night?

@EW
Why are you asking Rag?, you have stated that you know who the visitor is.

hjelp wrote:It couldn't been a werewolf visiting halrob if halrob was jailed. Then we had known since a failed action from a werewolf.

No because Halrob doesnt get to know why his action failed.

hjelp wrote:If Rag was jailed then Rag couldn't visit halrob

We dont know who was jailed by Darin.

hjelp wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:"Helpful EW is scum EW"

ok apparently me helping out is scummy to people here.

When I make typing mistakes I'm also scummy, so "unhelpful EW = also scum EW".

The only town EW is AFK EW?

Rag, did you or did you not visit Halrob last night?

@EW
Why are you asking Rag?, you have stated that you know who the visitor is.

Declining to answer this for now, will answer it in the future.

chanakam2020 wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:"Helpful EW is scum EW"

ok apparently me helping out is scummy to people here.

When I make typing mistakes I'm also scummy, so "unhelpful EW = also scum EW".

The only town EW is AFK EW?

Rag, did you or did you not visit Halrob last night?

Did you count how many Mistakes you did ?
Typing Mistakes.
Vote counting mistakes
Post missing mistakes

Making so many mistakes does not make you a Good Boy

Does it make me a bad boy?

Also I dont see the vote counting mistakes but eh

Extreme Ways wrote:

hjelp wrote:It couldn't been a werewolf visiting halrob if halrob was jailed. Then we had known since a failed action from a werewolf.

No because Halrob doesnt get to know why his action failed. ...

It has nothing to do with Halrob knowing or not. It's the nature of a Werewolf failure.

Extreme Ways wrote:

chanakam2020 wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:"Helpful EW is scum EW"

ok apparently me helping out is scummy to people here.

When I make typing mistakes I'm also scummy, so "unhelpful EW = also scum EW".

The only town EW is AFK EW?

Rag, did you or did you not visit Halrob last night?

Did you count how many Mistakes you did ?
Typing Mistakes.
Vote counting mistakes
Post missing mistakes

Making so many mistakes does not make you a Good Boy

Does it make me a bad boy?

Also I dont see the vote counting mistakes but eh

Yes very very bad Boy.
You are continously lossing Good Boy Points.
You so soon forgot that you made a mistake on counting Sonic unvote at D-1

hjelp wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:

hjelp wrote:It couldn't been a werewolf visiting halrob if halrob was jailed. Then we had known since a failed action from a werewolf.

No because Halrob doesnt get to know why his action failed. ...

It has nothing to do with Halrob knowing or not. It's the nature of a Werewolf failure.

Elaborate?

Additional question: are you using werewolf and mafia as one and the same?

We know there wasnt a killing action on Halrob because we had two other deaths, one of which could still be from a town vigilante. We do not know whether wolves roleblocked Halrob.

FP'd by Chana you are right I did miss Sonic unvoting you/voting DDS

Did anyone see these 4 On D-2 ?

• Devante
• Kingm
• Max
• Devon

Are they still sleeping ? (Because of they ar too tired from yesterday night wandering ?)

Extreme Ways wrote:

hjelp wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:

hjelp wrote:It couldn't been a werewolf visiting halrob if halrob was jailed. Then we had known since a failed action from a werewolf.

No because Halrob doesnt get to know why his action failed. ...

It has nothing to do with Halrob knowing or not. It's the nature of a Werewolf failure.

Elaborate?

Additional question: are you using werewolf and mafia as one and the same?

We know there wasnt a killing action on Halrob because we had two other deaths, one of which could still be from a town vigilante. We do not know whether wolves roleblocked Halrob.

FP'd by Chana you are right I did miss Sonic unvoting you/voting DDS

I see now that I wrote wrong, sorry about that. It shall read
- It couldn't been a werewolf visiting halrob if halrob wasn't jailed. Then we had known since a failed action from a Werewolf. -

Halrob would have been killed if a successfull Werewolf.
I use a Werewolf as 3P.

This is the 500th Post in this thread