blacky365 wrote:This is utter madness!
I go into a meeting for a few hours and come out to see Pershy is at L-2!!
I really don’t think pershy has said anything that warrants this and for those that say they want a claim is just hypocritical after I and others were called out for doing the same to jfm!
Maybe don't skim?
Tobikera wrote:
To me, the scummiest thing that has happened in the entire D1 was pershy coming off of 5 days hiatus and immediately voting for jfm10, bringing him to L-1 (at that time). That's not the way pershy usually plays. He hems and haws, patting people on the back, portrays himself as seeing all sides of the issue at hand, playing Mr. Understanding and Accepetance, AND THEN, even after building a case against someone, WILL NOT VOTE. He'll only vote when he acts like everyone else has convinced him to do so. He didn't do that here. He came back from vacation and immediately voted for jfm10, not just joining the wagon, but taking him to L-1 (pardon the repetition). I tell you, it's atypical pershyness.
ZaBeast wrote:I take issue with Tobi, pershy, blacky and SK's opportunistic bandwagonning and role-fishing.
[...]
pershy wrote:no, I don't think he has
vote jfm
I think we will get an extension of 48 hours but we need a claim and a lynch. If your claim is sufficiently good jfm then we might still have time to pressure chaps but probably not.
We need a lynch either way on D1 for information.
sorry nothing personal from me either.
[...]
pershy wrote:But that's just based on a gut feeling. I suppose the likely candidates based on current votes to get any traction are chapcrap or mets or possibly myself according to what a few people have said. I personally don't find chapcrap scummy.
But there probably isn't time unless the mod grants another couple of days I guess. I feel we have had a fairly productive D1 at least and we have got one claim which cleared jfm in my eyes at least for now. Seems a fitting ability for this game -
especially the detail of the ability starting weak and getting stronger. Seemed legit to me.
pershy seemingly not understanding that every role that can target people becomes more useful as the game progresses. As time goes by you have a smaller pool of people to investigate/kill/jail/... and a better idea who to target. I mean, there's a reason why vigilantes should wait and not kill on the 1st phase they're able to. For someone who said he played mafia 8 years that's pretty weird to see that part as a confirmation the role is legit. It is the least useful part of jfm's claim, as BuJ already stated.
pershy wrote:..and Bujaber just came onto my radar.
A fine OMGUS if you ask me, even if there wasn't a vote associated with it.
I also liked
BuJ case about pershy.
BuJaber wrote:
Pretty sure this is a scum reaction.
Feels the need to state that he believes the claim 4 times. Really? 4 times just in case someone missed the first 3 times he said it in the same page.
And the part that he "especially" believes is basically the least alignment indicative part of the whole thing. Mafia can do math. In fact it's one of the easiest ways to look legit. Use a probability argument.
There is like 0 reason to believe him after the full claim if you didn't believe him after the soft claim.
1. Not everyone has had a chance to counter claim. He didn't even post the actual name.
2. There's nothing about that description that makes it a town-only role.
3. Given that he claimed a protective earlier, this wasn't that big of a reveal. Nothing very revealing.
So all in all this looks like scum that was just waiting for a reason to 'believe' him.
@Tobi/pershy Your plan is a terrible one. To prove your role, you'd disclose the result another player got (which is basically outing his role, I assume you'd get something like "(player Y/his target) has been protected/investigated as .../role-blocked"). It might somewhat prove your role if you could tell us who your target visited (but nothing tells you the wording of the PM you'll receive will give that information), but, as mets pointed out, it wouldn't necessarily mean you're town aligned. If somebody belives he is scum, he should vote to lynch him, if someone doesn't believe he is scum, he should have never voted him, because there is no confirming that role apart from a cop claim.
Also, as rage pointed out, someone could interfere with his action with/without him knowing.
pershy wrote:Actually I’ve been mulling it over some more. Of the votes on me I think tobi and Dakk are misguided town.
Tobi started the train pretty much. I don’t think he’s scum.
Quite a change of stance from the vote you put on him just the previous page
Sirius Kase wrote:It seems like deja vu all over again. Last time I was in a position to put someone to L-1, I backed out and move my vote first to Pershy and then to darin. I didn't think it was fair to leave my vote on someone who just didn't seem scummy enough. I don't think it's wise to get any closer to a lynch when all we wanted was an extension. Pershy woke up so I was uncomfortable voting for him, but darin died at the hands of the moderator.
The extension WAS to get time to get a lynch. When you get someone to claim, you basically have to ask yourself "is he scummy enough to risk losing that role"? That's mostly why jfm was given a pass, because doc is a pretty valuable role, but I'd be surprised if the topic doesn't come back on later days as he hasn't been cleared.