Conquer Club

26 medals

37 medals, with 2-3 more coming.

Big Whiskey wrote:26 medals

ty

White Moose wrote:37 medals, with 2-3 more coming.

ok



keep me posted thx

Blitzaholic wrote:




Players to 3500 score and 30 medals

1. Blitzaholic 3808 score + 61 medals

So for reference you are saying you were at 3808 when you hit 61 medals? Am I reading this right? I do not remember you being up that high when hitting 61 medals, but I could be wrong. Should you not have to maintain rank when you get these medals.? I mean sure 27 medals like Prank got is a big deal, but he went down to SGT to get it. Now with that said, when he gets his rank back up (Assuming he does) He can then move up on the list, and people who do not know will look and see the score and medals. Those people will then have a slightly distorted view of it all?? Thoughts?

Bruceswar wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:




Players to 3500 score and 30 medals

1. Blitzaholic 3808 score + 61 medals

So for reference you are saying you were at 3808 when you hit 61 medals? Am I reading this right? I do not remember you being up that high when hitting 61 medals, but I could be wrong. Should you not have to maintain rank when you get these medals.? I mean sure 27 medals like Prank got is a big deal, but he went down to SGT to get it. Now with that said, when he gets his rank back up (Assuming he does) He can then move up on the list, and people who do not know will look and see the score and medals. Those people will then have a slightly distorted view of it all?? Thoughts?

Not that anyone would pay even a cent for my two cents but I am in accord...

Innate to achieving medals comes game-playing in uncomfortable settings and maps and therefore more losses. He or she who can maintain the highest score WHILE achieving medals is most deserving...

Bruceswar wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:




Players to 3500 score and 30 medals

1. Blitzaholic 3808 score + 61 medals

So for reference you are saying you were at 3808 when you hit 61 medals? Am I reading this right? I do not remember you being up that high when hitting 61 medals, but I could be wrong. Should you not have to maintain rank when you get these medals.? I mean sure 27 medals like Prank got is a big deal, but he went down to SGT to get it. Now with that said, when he gets his rank back up (Assuming he does) He can then move up on the list, and people who do not know will look and see the score and medals. Those people will then have a slightly distorted view of it all?? Thoughts?

you are reading it wrong bruce, it says up there in the bracket 3500 score and 30 medals, when I had over 3800 score 2 months back, i had way over 30 medals, i had like 50 or so, so yes, i was the 1st one to do it. the 61 is there now cause i got more medals, the score does not drop, its locked in, but i cant go up to the next level til i hit 4000 score, cause it says 4000 score and 40 medals (which is the next bracket range), i could have 100 medals, but i need to get to 4000 score again to be in next bracket, as you see prankcall says 27 medals and over 4200 score on page 1, he got his 27th medal at like 1300 score, but doesnt matter, he (prankcall) had 4295 score with 21 medals, he had that within the bracket, just like me and many others on page 1, its within the bracket range. so does not matter if prank goes to 1300 and now has 27 medals he still stays in same bracket, he can only move up when he hits 30 medals, but then would need the score within that range at that time, to move up into next bracket range, if he does not, he stays in the bracket he is in, same with jr, see page 1 again, Johnnyrocket24 3506 score + 32 medals, now needs 3500 score again to move up to next bracket. jr got his 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 medals with scores of 1800, but he had over 3500 score when he has 20 medals or so, so he is locked in that level or bracket, now that he has 30 medals plus and did at at 1800 score plus, since 30 medals is in a higher level or bracket, he cant move up there to he hits it again. hope this clarifies it. lt.pie, scott-land and myself and a few others went over this, or i have many times, sorry for any confusion.

3190 & 15 medal's

jabajabba wrote:3190 & 15 medal's

ok, ty



will add

Wolffystyle wrote:
Not that anyone would pay even a cent for my two cents but I am in accord...

Innate to achieving medals comes game-playing in uncomfortable settings and maps and therefore more losses. He or she who can maintain the highest score WHILE achieving medals is most deserving...

agreed, it is extremely difficult and challenging, and it is the reason i created the thread in the 1st place.

OK , So I understand what you are saying, but for the same token, he had 4200 (Prank) with 21 medals. To get those last 6 medals, he had to go down to 1300. Which means he could not maintain rank while getting the medals. Now 27 medals is a great feat, but I thought the point of this thread was to reward those who got medals while keeping rank. If you medal hunted and lost tons of points doing so, does that not say something about the game types you play? Now all you need to do is play games you are good at to get to the next level? Something seems off.

By the numbers...

4200 and 21 medals

1300 and 27 medals

Getting those last 6 cost him 2900 points, just as a rounded number. I assume it was the assassin medal that did it. Anyhow point is which is accurate. If he gets the 2900 back playing games he is good at, then he gets to move to the next level. Seems odd to me. Anyhow your thread so run it as you please.

3223 & 16 medal's now : )

Bruceswar wrote:OK , So I understand what you are saying, but for the same token, he had 4200 (Prank) with 21 medals. To get those last 6 medals, he had to go down to 1300. Which means he could not maintain rank while getting the medals. Now 27 medals is a great feat, but I thought the point of this thread was to reward those who got medals while keeping rank. If you medal hunted and lost tons of points doing so, does that not say something about the game types you play? Now all you need to do is play games you are good at to get to the next level? Something seems off.

By the numbers...

4200 and 21 medals

1300 and 27 medals

Getting those last 6 cost him 2900 points, just as a rounded number. I assume it was the assassin medal that did it. Anyhow point is which is accurate. If he gets the 2900 back playing games he is good at, then he gets to move to the next level. Seems odd to me. Anyhow your thread so run it as you please.

ty bruce for your feedback, anyone and everyone who goes for medals of 25,26,27 is going to go down a ton in score like that if they set up a ton at same time, it takes hard work, very hard work, many are doing this, if you are willing to do that to get medals, i commend them all like jr, prank for doing it, they still stay in that bracket though sealed, now, if they choose to play a ton of games they good at and get it up, super, if so, they will go to next level, all have to do things like this to keep rising higher, or you will just stay in the same bracket, for some that may be ok, but the bar of medals is rising, so it will be more dauting of a task to do, so get em while u can, score is so easy, medals are hard and take tons of games and time, much effort,, tremendous amount, so well worth it if you can. gl in everyones quest to get em.

Whats the issue here? I can guarantee there is not a single person that will maintain their rank going for medals unless they were a Sgt to begin with,or ofcourse they farm which is something I did not want to do.I could have set up numerous games on maps with settings that would have highly favored me to win,instead I chose to play games which ofcourse I would not stand a great chance of winning but atleast all players would have an idea of what is going on.A player can easily maintain or increase their rank playing or going for any Medal except Assassin as most games in this setting people often run themselves into the ground or said Player into the ground giving them little chance to win.

No issues, really, just an observation. 27 medals is killer. I doubt I will ever make it. Congrats!

I forgot to post when I was at 3076 pts... but I had 3076 and 23 medals

3260 and 16 medals

30 medals lol^^

negoeien wrote:30 medals lol^^

Is this the record in CC?

30 medals.... my gosh....

What about a ranking for medals per games played?

Onmyway wrote:

negoeien wrote:30 medals lol^^

Is this the record in CC?

30 medals.... my gosh....

64 is right here, and they owe me 2 more for tourney wins


so i got 66

Blitzaholic wrote:

Onmyway wrote:

negoeien wrote:30 medals lol^^

Is this the record in CC?

30 medals.... my gosh....

64 is right here, and they owe me 2 more for tourney wins


so i got 66

medals are for sissies! when you getting rest of game achievement medals ? it looks alot nicer when they are all gold. just look to the right of your screen....see...very nice!

i have 20 medals now! score: 3927

3667 and still 14 medals

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

Onmyway wrote:

negoeien wrote:30 medals lol^^

Is this the record in CC?

30 medals.... my gosh....

64 is right here, and they owe me 2 more for tourney wins


so i got 66

medals are for sissies! when you getting rest of game achievement medals ? it looks alot nicer when they are all gold. just look to the right of your screen....see...very nice!

oh, they are coming