Page 17 of 25
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:59 pm
by Machiavelli
Think about how your win condition is stated, and then think about why it is stated that way, and then think about how much my serial killer theory makes sense
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:00 pm
by wicked
wow, I'm sold. I was wondering about the two methods of death as well. Nice writing Auto!
So why did Sen say RK was the vigilante, and not the doc?
And where do we go from here?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:01 pm
by Machiavelli
Well, I could make a big case including lots of quotes and explaining, or you could just trust my hunch.
Houssam is the serial killer.
Vote Houssamthegreat
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:02 pm
by Machiavelli
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:02 pm
by wicked
Can someone re-read and see if anyone brought up the serial killer previous to this in such a way that makes them look guilty?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:04 pm
by wicked
ok fast-posted there. uhh, I'm going to need more evidence than just your word. not that I dont' agree with your theories, but I don't follow anyone blindly in this game!
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:04 pm
by Machiavelli
Do I have to go back and prove it to you
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:05 pm
by HoussamTheGreat
Machiavelli wrote:I now believe that the deputy(Fircoal) and the mafia cop (Senfive) could talk.
That is why Fircoal was killed, because the mafia knew that he was a cop.
Replay of the first night
Senfive investigated RK to see if his doc claim was true. Auto told Senfive that RK was the doc.
Fircoal investigated someone (we really cant tell who), and reported the results to Senfive. Senfive realized that Fircoal was a cop.
Senfive shares this with the rest of the mafia, and so they kill Fircoal.
The serial killer is the one who killed MB.
The next day we lynched Senfive
Replay of Night two
Option A
The serial killer and the mafia both killed Rev.
Option B
The serial killer tried to kill rev, because of Rev's claim.
And the mafia tried to kill me, because of how sure I was of Sen's guilt.
Rev protected me.
errrr.... what??
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:06 pm
by wicked
what do YOU think?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:06 pm
by Machiavelli
Fine, I understand.
If you want to look for your self though, check out those pages where Houssam is trying to find out what Rev was implying.
There is more but I dont remember where it was atm.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:07 pm
by Machiavelli
HoussamTheGreat wrote:Machiavelli wrote:I now believe that the deputy(Fircoal) and the mafia cop (Senfive) could talk.
That is why Fircoal was killed, because the mafia knew that he was a cop.
Replay of the first night
Senfive investigated RK to see if his doc claim was true. Auto told Senfive that RK was the doc.
Fircoal investigated someone (we really cant tell who), and reported the results to Senfive. Senfive realized that Fircoal was a cop.
Senfive shares this with the rest of the mafia, and so they kill Fircoal.
The serial killer is the one who killed MB.
The next day we lynched Senfive
Replay of Night two
Option A
The serial killer and the mafia both killed Rev.
Option B
The serial killer tried to kill rev, because of Rev's claim.
And the mafia tried to kill me, because of how sure I was of Sen's guilt.
Rev protected me.
errrr.... what??
Dont deny it, you will only make yourself look guiltier
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:08 pm
by Machiavelli
Houssam, If I hadnt accused you of being the serial killer, you do agree that there is a serial killer correct?
Think carefully before you answer, but answer quickly too.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:10 pm
by HoussamTheGreat
Machiavelli wrote:autoload wrote:Examining his body the town found that he was both shot in the head and slit across the throat.
QFE
I thought we were not meant to read too much into the details. no?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:11 pm
by HoussamTheGreat
Machiavelli wrote:Houssam, If I hadnt accused you of being the serial killer, you do agree that there is a serial killer correct?
Think carefully before you answer, but answer quickly too.
I actually missed the fact that you accused me of being the serial killer. I posted as soon as I read the whole deputy was talking to the mafia cop scenario.
now that i know you are accusing me, I don't like you that much anymore!!
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:11 pm
by Machiavelli
So is thta a no? You dont think there is a serial killer?
Answer quickly now.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:12 pm
by wicked
That's in Andy's games Houssam. Auto never stated that condition.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:13 pm
by HoussamTheGreat
Machiavelli wrote:Well, I could make a big case including lots of quotes and explaining, or you could just trust my hunch.
Houssam is the serial killer.
Vote Houssamthegreat
oh THERE it is.
What have I done again? Why not you being the serial killer? and if I were, why did I not get rid of you last night since you had already said you were going on that trail?
Clearly a retaliatory but also on the merits of the case FOS Mac...
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:14 pm
by HoussamTheGreat
Machiavelli wrote:So is thta a no? You dont think there is a serial killer?
Answer quickly now.
I think there clearly is either a serial killer or a vigilante. It's just not me. either!
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:16 pm
by Machiavelli
Think about your win condition, does it not imply that there is a 2nd anti-town party?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:17 pm
by wicked
So does a serial killer win when everyone else is dead?
H, I think it's clear by the townie win condition that there's a serial killer, not a vigilante. A vigilante would give the town too much power, game wouldn't be balanced.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:18 pm
by HoussamTheGreat
Machiavelli wrote:Think about your win condition, does it not imply that there is a 2nd anti-town party?
right. now that you mention this it's kinda obvious. this is why the reference is not to eliminate mafia which it typically would be - that's why senfive tripped - makes a whole lot of sense now. sort of like wearing glasses for the first time.
I am off for an hour - so if I am delayed responding you will know.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:19 pm
by Machiavelli
HoussamTheGreat wrote: Why not you being the serial killer? and if I were, why did I not get rid of you last night since you had already said you were going on that trail?
What trail are you reffering to?
And as for why you didnt kill me, you were happy getting the doctor
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:21 pm
by Machiavelli
Wicked, Houssam is anti-town, and from the way he interacted with Senfive, I highly doubt he is mafia.
If I bet my life on the fact will that get your vote? I am fully willing to bet my life that Houssam is anti-town.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:21 pm
by Incandenza
Okay, Mach, the serial killer thing is good...
And I get why the mafia would kill RK
And I get why the serial killer would kill RK
But you're going to have to do better than 'I've got a hunch that houssam is the serial killer'...
I'll be around intermittently.... work beckons
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:25 pm
by HoussamTheGreat
Machiavelli wrote:HoussamTheGreat wrote: Why not you being the serial killer? and if I were, why did I not get rid of you last night since you had already said you were going on that trail?
What trail are you reffering to?
And as for why you didnt kill me, you were happy getting the doctor
Do the serial killer and mafia communicate? If your theory about the double killing is corect, then clearly the don't. If they don't then the only info that he had was rk being the vig, which on the face of it makes this a strange killing for him. Am I missing something?