Page 16 of 19
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:29 am
by Minister Masket
Whoever thought it'd be a good idea to try and take me out last night isn't laughing now!
That's why there was no kill.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:47 am
by AceArtemis
Minister Masket wrote:Whoever thought it'd be a good idea to try and take me out last night isn't laughing now!
That's why there was no kill.
You are bulletproof?
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:35 pm
by Minister Masket
AceArtemis wrote:Minister Masket wrote:Whoever thought it'd be a good idea to try and take me out last night isn't laughing now!
That's why there was no kill.
You are bulletproof?
Oh yes.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:06 pm
by pmchugh
Minister Masket wrote:AceArtemis wrote:Minister Masket wrote:Whoever thought it'd be a good idea to try and take me out last night isn't laughing now!
That's why there was no kill.
You are bulletproof?
Oh yes.
Intresting, because of the delay i can't remember if you claimed or not or if you had reason to be targetted.
If you hadn't claimed why do so now? What if an SK or other faction was about to target you?
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:00 pm
by Minister Masket
I can think of plenty of reasons to remove me from the game. Usually I bugger things up around this point.
It's more preferable to rub their failure in their face than keep it secret. Selfish yes, but oh so satisfying.

Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:47 pm
by sheepofdumb
Personally I'd rather investigate than going into vig mode and killing people. Unfortunately it hasn't been working.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:15 am
by gimpyThewonder
sheepofdumb wrote:Hmmm, seems like my JOAT powers are broken. I got Stark on the person I investigated. I got Stark on the first person too.
aren't JOAT powers 1 shot deals? how have you gotten to repeat your investigation power?
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:57 am
by sheepofdumb
It depends on the mod. Inventor's are almost always 1 shot deals while JOAT can have unlimited use of their powers.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:59 am
by AceArtemis
Hey sheep, you've already claimed everything else. Care to claim your name?
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:56 pm
by Suspect101
Minister Masket wrote:I can think of plenty of reasons to remove me from the game. Usually I bugger things up around this point.
It's more preferable to rub their failure in their face than keep it secret. Selfish yes, but oh so satisfying.

interesting statement.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:57 pm
by Suspect101
sheepofdumb wrote:Personally I'd rather investigate than going into vig mode and killing people. Unfortunately it hasn't been working.
who have you investigated
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:15 pm
by Minister Masket
Suspect101 wrote:Minister Masket wrote:I can think of plenty of reasons to remove me from the game. Usually I bugger things up around this point.
It's more preferable to rub their failure in their face than keep it secret. Selfish yes, but oh so satisfying.

interesting statement.
I try to make all of my mafia statements interesting. Ask anyone here.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:19 pm
by pmchugh
Minister Masket wrote:Suspect101 wrote:Minister Masket wrote:I can think of plenty of reasons to remove me from the game. Usually I bugger things up around this point.
It's more preferable to rub their failure in their face than keep it secret. Selfish yes, but oh so satisfying.

interesting statement.
I try to make all of my mafia statements interesting. Ask anyone here.
Yes sometimes at the expense of giving away your role... (or lying

)
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:21 pm
by Minister Masket
You know you love it.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:09 pm
by sheepofdumb
I am The Mighty Drunken King.
pmchung - Eddard Stark
animorpherv1 - Self due to mirrors
The Fuzzy Pengui - Eddard Stark (Wait what?)
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:01 pm
by pmchugh
sheepofdumb wrote:I am The Mighty Drunken King.
pmchung - Eddard Stark
animorpherv1 - Self due to mirrors
The Fuzzy Pengui - Eddard Stark (Wait what?)
I did tell you I wasn't Eddard Stark.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 3)
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:08 pm
by pmchugh
pmchugh wrote:sheepofdumb wrote:I investigated for the past two nights as well and found that pmc is Eddard Stark I don't know his role 'cus I was drunk. My other investigation failed due to someone reversing me. Clever jerk put a mirror in front of me. I was wondering who that good looking person was.
Huh that is not my role name
pmchugh wrote:suspect wrote:jesterhawk wrote:Really....
vote pmchugh
JH
just out of curiosity, why did you vote PMC for this?
Eddard doesn't sound like a nice bloke from wikipedia but I promise you he is mistaken, that is not my role..
Busdriver?
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:02 pm
by pmchugh
Ok sorry for the triple post but this game is way dead and we need some ideas going.
Fist off mod we need lots of prods.Next:
Fuzzy is your role name Eddard Stark?
Is green third party? I'm confused nate said that Orange was town and that green was ? as was blue. I think it seems likely that Red/Blue are scum Orange is obviously town but I don't understand what green as considering that LSU seemed townie to me.
And also once again Mister Minister has confused me:
Minister Masket wrote:LSU's stratigical backfire is one of the greatest I have ever witnessed, so congratulations.
BTW, if we can't decide this today, Mr Viavant could the following night.
So you are a bulletproof role cop

Is this a joke as Im pretty sure he never claimed, and if not why would you expose him. I don't understand this post.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:02 pm
by Simon Viavant
pmchugh wrote: Fist off mod we need lots of prods.
Sorry, I was gone for awhile.
I'll be open, I'm third party (not SK), and I'm declaring neutrality right now.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:44 am
by pmchugh
Simon Viavant wrote:pmchugh wrote: Fist off mod we need lots of prods.
Sorry, I was gone for awhile.
I'll be open, I'm third party (not SK), and I'm declaring neutrality right now.
Strange move, very strange. What colo
ur is your role name? Did MM really know anything about you? If so then you apparently have killing powers which in my book makes you an SK or if not then there was no need to claim as you were under no pressure.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:02 am
by Minister Masket
No-one said I was a cop. Mr Viavent is more useful than he's letting on, but he probably has nothing to worry about. The mafia won't risk wasting a kill.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:29 am
by pmchugh
Minister Masket wrote:No-one said I was a cop. Mr Viavent is more useful than he's letting on, but he probably has nothing to worry about. The mafia won't risk wasting a kill.

Stop telling us half stories and dropping hints it only does scum good to confuse town members, if you do have information about another player being useful you should not reveal it unless that person is in trouble, and when you do reveal it you should reveal 100% or near to it. Now Im speculating about info we have been given on him and you:
MM:
1. Bulletproof
2. Not a cop.
3. Somehow knows someone elses role.
4. Conditions that satisfy 2 and 3: Mason, Lover, Scum, Special role, said person has special role.
SV:
1. Third Party
2. Can kill at least once.
3. Is "useful"
4. Must be in some kind of night communication with MM.
This ties the two of you together, I am beginning to think this may be some elaborate plot to clear yourselves when in fact your actually scum buddies. MM could have choosen not to kill to back up his claim of being bulletproof. SV says im "nuetral" so that town leave him alone and then MM backs him up saying he is "useful" yet other killers shouldn't kill him.
Both of you are being ridiculously defensive, both of you without revealing your roles have given the town reason not to lynch you and scum reason not to kill you. MM your claiming bulletproof so obviously scum wont risk killing you and you stated that was why there was no kill meaning "scum were trying to kill me" therefore I am town. Only you and killers benifit from you telling us that your bulletproof, town doesn't as the info does not help us to catch scum in any way. SV your claiming neutrality to try and be left alone, tell me this if your third party you must have some objective different to the town or have WC's that mean you can win with scum so how can we trust your not going to back stab us?
Now if your telling the truth it's your own dam fault for revealing anything in the first place when I see absolutely zero reason to do so.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:38 pm
by captainwalrus
pmc seems oddly determined to go after SV and minister masket. Either he is trying to get the game moving or he seems to have something against them. Although, claiming bulletproof is odd since he seemed to imply that if he was targeted, bad things happen th e the targeter and if that targeter is mafia, why warn them. And I don't know why you think that SV and MM are linked but, it could be that simon was the one who targeted Minister Masket, which is why he was pressured to claim nuturale, since perhaps MM knew who did it. Just thinking out loud, but pmc does seem odd.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:18 pm
by Minister Masket
Boy oh boy, it's Skim-City here tonight, although Mr Walrus' guesses are pretty close.
Simon did indeed investigate me, and I know that because I was told he did. BTW pmc, you're starting to dig a hole here.
Re: A Game of Thrones (Day 4)
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:32 pm
by pmchugh
Minister Masket wrote:Boy oh boy, it's Skim-City here tonight, although Mr Walrus' guesses are pretty close.
Simon did indeed investigate me, and I know that because I was told he did. BTW pmc, you're starting to dig a hole here.
Could you please quote what it is that I've missed, or "Skimmed". Investigate makes much more sense I understand now, I would say why didn't you tell me that earlier but apparently you did.
Still a few questinos remain:
1. Why did you reveal that he was a cop in the first place?
2. Why did you claim bulletproof?
And it apparently doesn't matter if I dig a hole for myself as no-one is around so I can just climb right out, I am trying to get the game moving yet with 3 active players its kinda hard.