you'll be in sun tzu's second book.SCuD. wrote:and... in response to Caff.... I think you will find that what I said was groundbreaking. I will perhaps be spoken of in the same vein as Kurt Godel in years to come.
Moderator: Clan Directors
you'll be in sun tzu's second book.SCuD. wrote:and... in response to Caff.... I think you will find that what I said was groundbreaking. I will perhaps be spoken of in the same vein as Kurt Godel in years to come.

whenever i see you, i start craving for pistachiosIcePack wrote:Yeah this was more meant as a fun excersize regarding events. Sounds like his is more all encompassing including time on scene and pick up wars, etc. so a lot more broad then what I put togetherrockfist wrote:Ice pack did something like that if you scroll up, it’s here I don’t 100% agree with his methodology but it’s a good starting place.
I’m open to suggestions on changing the method, I wasn’t planning on really keeping up w or making it some significant thing beyond adding to the discussion a bit
The Art of Bore?iAmCaffeine wrote:you'll be in sun tzu's second book.SCuD. wrote:and... in response to Caff.... I think you will find that what I said was groundbreaking. I will perhaps be spoken of in the same vein as Kurt Godel in years to come.

I don’t post much, but that’s funny.niMic wrote:The Art of Bore?iAmCaffeine wrote:you'll be in sun tzu's second book.SCuD. wrote:and... in response to Caff.... I think you will find that what I said was groundbreaking. I will perhaps be spoken of in the same vein as Kurt Godel in years to come.
niMic wrote:The Art of Bore?iAmCaffeine wrote:you'll be in sun tzu's second book.SCuD. wrote:and... in response to Caff.... I think you will find that what I said was groundbreaking. I will perhaps be spoken of in the same vein as Kurt Godel in years to come.

You mean, after they were both caught doing sitting abuse ? So no hell no they'll never be doing that kind of shit ( again ) ?I realize some people might be under the illusion that "everyone does it" or "the top clans probably do worse", and I hate to burst bubbles, but I know for a fact that neither S&M nor TOFU would ever do that shit. Hell, both clans work energetically to eliminate even the hint of sitting abuse. They play with integrity.
Pretty sure it's completely allowed by current site rule, and not even sure why you're seeing a problem to that.But in an official clan game, in the Conquerors Cup? No... just no. Clear-cut cheating.


Donelladan wrote:You mean, after they were both caught doing sitting abuse ? So no hell no they'll never be doing that kind of shit ( again ) ?I realize some people might be under the illusion that "everyone does it" or "the top clans probably do worse", and I hate to burst bubbles, but I know for a fact that neither S&M nor TOFU would ever do that shit. Hell, both clans work energetically to eliminate even the hint of sitting abuse. They play with integrity.
Because nowadays they have to play with integrity. Just trying to follow.
Pretty sure it's completely allowed by current site rule, and not even sure why you're seeing a problem to that.But in an official clan game, in the Conquerors Cup? No... just no. Clear-cut cheating.
You're saying it's 100% ok to discuss map strategy before taking a turn, but not specific move on a turn. I fail to see a difference in so many cases.
For example :
100% map strategy : how would you play opening turn of a City Mogul trench double starting with R,Y,B,S base ? do you take Y sub T1 or you wait ?
Asking a 3rd pair of eyes to check your first turn of city mogul : Hey dude, look at my screenshot, do you think I take Y sub 1st turn ?
What's the difference ?
And I can multiply that example 100 times easily.
Asking a "general" strategic question to an expert on a given map just before taking your turn on it, the questions won't be "general", they'll be specific to what you're thinking about on that given game, even if you aren't as precise with territory than on my example.
Anyway, having 10 people check each games together on skype isn't even that much of a strategic advantage imho.
Because if they really do it means those 10 people have to spend sooo much time discussing strategy.
Ever had to discuss a single move with 4 guys having strongly different opinion ? Imagine doing it with 10 guys ! That'll be hell of a mess.
Now let be realistic, maybe only 2-3 guys contribute really to the discussion among those 10, probably those 2-3 guys are the best on the map and are already the one playing it. They just have the discussion on a general channel rather than a private one. No big deal.
Probably as you say, if one guy was really contributing to every discussion, then he'll be burned out pretty quickly.
Your comparison with chess doesn't make sense to me. Is chess a team game ?
Yes, we communicate in the teams that play the game. Some top clans more than others. No, we don't compeltely lift fog to teammates to ask for advice.willedtowin1 wrote:LMFAO
You all Communicate....Every One of You in the Top Clans!
No matter how you word it......
This thread is as about as Bad as our USA/ World wide political situation.
Gimme a Fucking Break. Many of us are not as stupid as you think.
Disclaimer: I will Laughingly not Ever Reply Back
Just wanted to state the Obvious
(as much as possible) LMFAO
You may not be as stupid as we think, but you're definitely not as smart as you think.willedtowin1 wrote:LMFAO
You all Communicate....Every One of You in the Top Clans!
No matter how you word it......
This thread is as about as Bad as our USA/ World wide political situation.
Gimme a Fucking Break. Many of us are not as stupid as you think.
Disclaimer: I will Laughingly not Ever Reply Back
Just wanted to state the Obvious
(as much as possible) LMFAO



That's absolute nonsense, Don. Being IN one of those clans, (I joined KoRT back in 2013 I think) I know that there were accusations flying left right and center that weren't true, or exaggerated. One player in particular used to jump in to save turns because he was always around, not because he had some arrangement to take people's turns. Some of those turns would have been misses due to people's real lives, as happens in every war. But then, I do remember a player who got in trouble by the clan for missing too many turns. They got told to take their own damn turns, or they'd get no more games, since it put the clan in a position to be accused of abuse. Maybe they had a legit reason, but it puts people in a precarious position. "Do I let this turn go, or do I take it? Is it crucial for the game? Will it cost the clan the war?" That's certainly not some intentional scheme.Donelladan wrote:You mean, after they were both caught doing sitting abuse ? So no hell no they'll never be doing that kind of shit ( again ) ?I realize some people might be under the illusion that "everyone does it" or "the top clans probably do worse", and I hate to burst bubbles, but I know for a fact that neither S&M nor TOFU would ever do that shit. Hell, both clans work energetically to eliminate even the hint of sitting abuse. They play with integrity.
Because nowadays they have to play with integrity. Just trying to follow.


Yes, you can infer that I do not agree with your sentiment on this subject.Can I infer from your post that you/LHDD do not agree with my sentiment on this subject? Do you have people outside the games giving advice to your teams?
Not my point at all, I have lot of respect for the achievements of S&M and TOFU and to me they deserve all the titles/wins they got.Oh I know the idea that KoRT and TOFU cheated their way to the top is a glamorous idea for low ranked clans of the time.
that's a positive spin on it sureniMic wrote:Sure, but that's just because josko is the single most dedicated CC player I've ever played with


That may be true. I don't know a whole lot of what went on before I got pulled into the clan scene. In fact, I knew nothing and never read clan forums. I was approached by a few clans to consider joining them, not the other way around. I had to ask, "what exactly do you do in a clan and what's the benefit of joining one?" I was green to it all.Donelladan wrote:@Shannon - Arama86n said that he joined in 2012 and that the events I am referring to happened a year before that.
Seeing as you joined in 2013, I'd say you are mistaken.
I wasn't there back then either ( on CC but not as active in the clan scene and not reading C&A). Thus I will not speak about the veracity of the facts. But you must know that players from both clan were warned for sitting abuse. Hence I don't think I am speaking about "absolute nonsense".
And the current clan sitting rules were created because of what happened and because of those two clans.
Know I really like what you said in your post about sitting, and @rockfist, yes i do know the truth of what Shannon is saying, but do TOFU and S&M know it ?
The only two clans that ever complained about sitting in a clan war against LHDD were... TOFU and S&M ( privately or in public, some complains were transmitted in a nicer way.) -![]()


