Moderator: Community Team




yes, i will probably filter his posts today and read through thembetiko wrote:I perfectly agree with boone and that was my point.
Boone, are you more interested in the hotshot case today than you were yesterday?
HotShot53 wrote: Not sure what is so important about the iron throne...
mtamburini wrote:##VOTE NO LYNCH
I havent caught up in the readings yet but Im glad we can talk in the night so I can go over my reads on what I think has happened today. Expect something in a couple hours just going to go shower and make some more food.
It s not the shower.... It s the food!!!!!!boonetown wrote:mtamburini wrote:##VOTE NO LYNCH
I havent caught up in the readings yet but Im glad we can talk in the night so I can go over my reads on what I think has happened today. Expect something in a couple hours just going to go shower and make some more food.
that's a long ass shower...

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
What I mean, is that right now I don't know who has the throne, or where it's at... and as far as I know it doesn't affect me anyway, so I'm not sure if it needs a lot of focus. Maybe a third party cares, or someone gets a bonus if they kill whoever is on the throne or something... but I guess for me I'm seeing this as more mafia with a few quirks, rather than GoT using some mafia mechanics. So I think it's more important to find scum, rather than to find the throne.boonetown wrote:HotShot53 wrote: Not sure what is so important about the iron throne...
i do not understand how you can say that. you know what game we're playing, right?
please explain to me where you were coming from with this.
I've played about 8 or so games on here over the last few months I think, and like 3-5 normal real life games over the years before this... so I have a little experience, but not extensive. What posts of mine have been weird?pretender77 wrote:does hotshot have experience in mafia....Im trying to figure out if where he is coming from with his slightly weird posts
I'm very much of a mind to agree with those who show you contradicting yourself here. I could say that any number of people who voted crasp should be held accountable but you're trying very hard to do an about face on the whole thing.I was not happy with the Crasp lynch from the start, it felt emotional to me, I put my vote there soley because Betiko was not going to get lynhced and I had to get a vote out. I thought that he would still get lynched when I unvoted as it was getting late and I was not expecting the activity that came in late yesterday. So a soft claim was enough for me to reassess my vote and put it where I thought the scum was. Maybe I jumped too fast, I should probably given crasp a bit more pressure to get more info out of him, I didnt realise how soft his claim was till I re read it again this morning. I think he is more town now that his claim has been expanded.
Yeah, this is kind of an odd thing to wonder about. What makes you say this, pretender?Army of GOD wrote:Curious as to why you're pointing this out.pretender77 wrote: FYI we need to be very careful in the next day phase about voting. I can EASILY see us getting L-3 and there being like a triple voter popping in there and lynching someone. Lets be careful
And to what end did you feel the need to reveal that?charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!


Well for one neb had 2 votes on the final vote count if im not mistakenpancakemix wrote:I'm very much of a mind to agree with those who show you contradicting yourself here. I could say that any number of people who voted crasp should be held accountable but you're trying very hard to do an about face on the whole thing.I was not happy with the Crasp lynch from the start, it felt emotional to me, I put my vote there soley because Betiko was not going to get lynhced and I had to get a vote out. I thought that he would still get lynched when I unvoted as it was getting late and I was not expecting the activity that came in late yesterday. So a soft claim was enough for me to reassess my vote and put it where I thought the scum was. Maybe I jumped too fast, I should probably given crasp a bit more pressure to get more info out of him, I didnt realise how soft his claim was till I re read it again this morning. I think he is more town now that his claim has been expanded.
Yeah, this is kind of an odd thing to wonder about. What makes you say this, pretender?Army of GOD wrote:Curious as to why you're pointing this out.pretender77 wrote: FYI we need to be very careful in the next day phase about voting. I can EASILY see us getting L-3 and there being like a triple voter popping in there and lynching someone. Lets be careful
And to what end did you feel the need to reveal that?charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!


Sometimes dogs need to be told to sit and when they don't mind then they need be put down!!pancakemix wrote:And to what end did you feel the need to reveal that?charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
Look again, it's not there. Think it was an error and mod fixed it.pretender77 wrote:Well for one neb had 2 votes on the final vote count if im not mistaken
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
But that means the player saying he was "not" on the throne to get Crasp lynched would also out themselves, if Crasp did flip town on a lynch. Without knowing the numbers, I'm not sure if a 1 for 1 trade is good in this game. I lean to yes. Especially, since Crasp's power is rather limited, right? If he knows who's on the throne, but never tells anyone, what the heck good is it?boonetown wrote:while i understand what you are saying, you understand that if a mafia currently sits on the throne, and crasps says "so and so it on the throne" the mafia can say "no i'm not" and get him lynched?
i'm just saying, outting a name, regardless of the throne or not, doesnt really help town as much as it helps mafia. especially if they have a role that allows them to check a player and get their character name.
does that make sense?
So, do you have some mafia we can hang, or are you just screaming for attention?charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
I see why you bring up Crasp as Zivel jumped off him so quick. But Crasp was not lynched. So, we could focus on his wagon and whether or not there were legitimate reasons for voting him. I would be more curious to see if there was any cross over between Crasp and Firth. Let's be honest, that Firth wagon took off like a rocket, on the word of Betiko. Now, I'm pretty much done with Betiko's case, but let's look at some history...pancakemix wrote:I'm very much of a mind to agree with those who show you contradicting yourself here. I could say that any number of people who voted crasp should be held accountable but you're trying very hard to do an about face on the whole thing.I was not happy with the Crasp lynch from the start, it felt emotional to me, I put my vote there soley because Betiko was not going to get lynhced and I had to get a vote out. I thought that he would still get lynched when I unvoted as it was getting late and I was not expecting the activity that came in late yesterday. So a soft claim was enough for me to reassess my vote and put it where I thought the scum was. Maybe I jumped too fast, I should probably given crasp a bit more pressure to get more info out of him, I didnt realise how soft his claim was till I re read it again this morning. I think he is more town now that his claim has been expanded.
So, looking at the votes...Hotshot, pretender77 and jak111 all jumped from Crasp to Firth. Hotshot is already in a bit of a "hotseat" with some players. He's worth looking into. pretender and jak are also worth looking into, but maybe a step below Hotshot in this group.StorrZerg wrote:End of votes Day 1
Current Vote Count
Voting ends 6/28 @ 16:00 CC time
Reminder any role pm actions must be in 1 hour before the dead line.
Mudpuppy(0): strike wolf
Strikewolf(0): Jmac1026
Epitaph(0): pretender77
Jak111(0): Charm, pancakemix
Jonty125(1): legionnare, jwiedlin
betiko (0): firth4eva, strike wolf, Army of God, Nebuchadnezer, jwiedlin, Jmac1026
27ninjabunnies (1): Iron Butterfly, Jak111
mtamburini (1) MudPuppy
Firth4eva (9): Betiko, strike wolf, Epitaph1, HotShot53, pancakemix, legionnare, kgb007, pretender77, jak111, crasp
crasp(3): Nebuchadnezer, HotShot53, Charm, Zivel, pretender77, jak111, jonty125, pershy
HotShot53(1): crasp, legionaire, jwiedlin, boonetown
Iron Butterfly (1): Zivel
jweidlin (1): 27ninjabunnies
Zivel (1): Nebuchadnezer
Voting No Lynch (1): mtamburini
Those who have do not have placed votes (0)
FANTASTIC EVERYONE PLACED A VOTE WOOOT!!!!
Alright, that was the main think I was referencing. Thanks storm for fixing itpancakemix wrote:Look again, it's not there. Think it was an error and mod fixed it.pretender77 wrote:Well for one neb had 2 votes on the final vote count if im not mistaken


Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
What's this all about? Dog catchers? Are you that guy from season 3/4 that is a complete torturer psychopath with the hunting dogs that rip people apart?charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
As for charm's post, look more closely at the first part. She knows that Mafia roleblocked her last night, does she know who did the deed?charm wrote:Dear Mafia Dogs!
Your role blocking was totally wasted on me last night! Ha ha!!
Oh and I'm on to a couple of you now. I'll watch to see how things progress today...but you are warned that you better back off or I'll send out a secret note to the dog catchers!
I have already done an about face on the whole thing (changed my vote), I am just trying to explain why now....pancakemix wrote: I'm very much of a mind to agree with those who show you contradicting yourself here. I could say that any number of people who voted crasp should be held accountable but you're trying very hard to do an about face on the whole thing..
but is serious about only ever claiming on his terms.betiko wrote:What someone does in the first place is try to get a claim before considering lynching someone.