Moderator: Community Team

Any reasons in particular that you're curious about a claim from me, or do you also hear the voices in your head who tell you what to think and who to vote for? Because I've been given no real reason for either of the votes on me.MudPuppy wrote: I think jonty is still a solid suspect... but I'm definitely eager to hear jmac claim.
Storr, you mentioned you'd be looking at IB, pcm, & kgb... and your vote is still on jonty. I'd like to hear more on your reads of jak and jmac.
Army of GOD wrote:I should stop posting...
I am not sure that someone who claimed Vig but says they won't be using the power for the time being and was close to being lynched after his claim is as big of target as you suggest.MudPuppy wrote:IF jonty is not part of Rishaed's faction, then they would have pegged him as a town PR or a member of the opposing scum faction. Either way, it makes him a likely target for them. I don't think it's absurd for a doc to save jonty. For the reasons stated before, he's a likely target for a hit... which makes him a likely target for a save if you believe his town claim.
Jmac1026 wrote:Vote Roger Dodger.Iron Butterfly wrote:You did not answer my question at all. I asked you why you believe jonty is Scum and why you believe anark is TownRoger Dodger wrote:Butterfly u can vote the way u want.why thank you. U r just vote me because I have a gut feeling.No I base my gut reactions on given information. You based your gut reaction on someone elses information. I am obviously not alone in feeling this way. I read I compare.I ask you...what did you read and what did you compare to draw your conclusions. I try to make the right choices
I really don't like the way he's been playing. Bandwagoning, poor (no) reasonings for the things he has said or done, and his participation has done nothing to further the conversation or cases in constructive ways.
That being said, I'd support a Anark lynch if the case was made for one. Claiming with only two votes? Come on man! You're acting like amateur hour at the Apollo.

I believe the quote there has my reasoning.spiesr wrote:Pending someone coming forward with a relevant night action or something I would like to consider lynching Jonty again today. With rishaed's death I have reason to believe that the multiple non-town killers theory is correct. I still think that having a Vig in addition to that would be too much. Vote Jonty I would also like some explanation for this.spiesr wrote:Are you saying that you are not willing to use you Vig power as a surrogate lynch if we decide we want to test your claim that way?jonty125 wrote:No Jak I'm not willing to play your game, if scum choose no kill N1, then I'm really screwed.
vote jak, there is nothing in the scene that implies this, so I cannot fathom how you can believe there were 2 kill blocks. You can't even say there were 0 kill blocks last night.jak111 wrote:I also have reason to believe that there were in fact 2 kill blocks (whether it be doc or roleblocker blocking the kills).
I was not aware of this game being a "hint game"jonty125 wrote:I believe the quote there has my reasoning.spiesr wrote:Pending someone coming forward with a relevant night action or something I would like to consider lynching Jonty again today. With rishaed's death I have reason to believe that the multiple non-town killers theory is correct. I still think that having a Vig in addition to that would be too much. Vote Jonty I would also like some explanation for this.spiesr wrote:Are you saying that you are not willing to use you Vig power as a surrogate lynch if we decide we want to test your claim that way?jonty125 wrote:No Jak I'm not willing to play your game, if scum choose no kill N1, then I'm really screwed.
Regarding, jmac, I think the case is weak, we build cases for lynching/claiming interchangeably.
vote jak, there is nothing in the scene that implies this, so I cannot fathom how you can believe there were 2 kill blocks. You can't even say there were 0 kill blocks last night.jak111 wrote:I also have reason to believe that there were in fact 2 kill blocks (whether it be doc or roleblocker blocking the kills).


What are you talking about Storr? Jonty is questioning how Jak could have ANY information about kill attempts and blocks. He claims he does. The only way any of us (beyond outside influence/abilities) could have that information is if it was given in a scene. It was not. Do you have any reasons to believe that Jak should know this information? Jonty and I don't.StorrZerg wrote:Mod just told me there won't be anything in day posts regarding roles or night actions
So get that Crap out of here jonty
Army of GOD wrote:I should stop posting...
I think it is pretty obvious the conclusion you can come to. And the mod has stated we won't be getting that kind of information in the scene, so we should just not being talking about that.Jmac1026 wrote:What are you talking about Storr? Jonty is questioning how Jak could have ANY information about kill attempts and blocks. He claims he does. The only way any of us (beyond outside influence/abilities) could have that information is if it was given in a scene. It was not. Do you have any reasons to believe that Jak should know this information? Jonty and I don't.StorrZerg wrote:Mod just told me there won't be anything in day posts regarding roles or night actions
So get that Crap out of here jonty


OK, let me illustrate my point. Let us go with theory that this is straight town vs. mafia (or any other scenario, with one anti-town killing faction). I didn't use my kill. Busdriver swapped mafia's original target, and rish. Rish ends up dead. No kills have been blocked. I can't see how jak can believe there were two blocked kills, never mind one.StorrZerg wrote:What i find interesting is that you both say he SHOULDN'T know anything yet he claims to know.

let's assume you're the town doc spiesr, who would you have targeted? a random person, nark or jonty?spiesr wrote:I am not sure that someone who claimed Vig but says they won't be using the power for the time being and was close to being lynched after his claim is as big of target as you suggest.MudPuppy wrote:IF jonty is not part of Rishaed's faction, then they would have pegged him as a town PR or a member of the opposing scum faction. Either way, it makes him a likely target for them. I don't think it's absurd for a doc to save jonty. For the reasons stated before, he's a likely target for a hit... which makes him a likely target for a save if you believe his town claim.
while i don't necessarily agree with jak and his seemingly 100% certainity of last night's events, it's not difficult for me to imagine a scenario where jak is some kind of town watcher, picked jonty to watch, and 3 different people visit jonty but no kills, from there he could assume a town doc and 2 members from different anti-town factions, thus his statement on 2 kills being stopped last nightjonty125 wrote:OK, let me illustrate my point. Let us go with theory that this is straight town vs. mafia (or any other scenario, with one anti-town killing faction). I didn't use my kill. Busdriver swapped mafia's original target, and rish. Rish ends up dead. No kills have been blocked. I can't see how jak can believe there were two blocked kills, never mind one.StorrZerg wrote:What i find interesting is that you both say he SHOULDN'T know anything yet he claims to know.
Now, let us say there was one blocked kill, which may or may not have happened. How would jak know it occured? Lets say he roleblocked player A, player B could have performed the kill. Lets say he docs player C, player D is targetted for the kill. Lets say he jailkeeps Player E, Player F could be the target or killer. I cannot think of a scenario where jak can have information that can lead to him knowing there was a blocked kill UNLESS he is a member of a killing faction, who's kill didn't go to plan, and as assumed it was due to a block.

Is that really voteworthy? That's totally speculative, and as the mod pointed out totally inaccurate. It'd be better to maybe suggest WHY that's not a true statement as opposed to voting him and saying it's not. I'm less inclined to believe your claim as time goes on, but what jak is saying could directly contradict what you're saying. Now that could go either way, but I'm more interested in seeing where this discussion goes at the moment.jonty125 wrote:vote jak, there is nothing in the scene that implies this, so I cannot fathom how you can believe there were 2 kill blocks. You can't even say there were 0 kill blocks last night.jak111 wrote:I also have reason to believe that there were in fact 2 kill blocks (whether it be doc or roleblocker blocking the kills).
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Given that I wanted him lynched yesterday it seems unlikely that I would have tried to protect him last night. If I am a Doc I would have targeted one of the unclaimed players last night.kgb007 wrote:let's assume you're the town doc spiesr, who would you have targeted? a random person, nark or jonty?
What other power roles would the mafia target? Until today with jmac's soft power role claim, there weren't any other known power roles. And even if jonty wasn't going to shoot last night... that doesn't prevent him from shooting the next night, if he thinks he's pretty sure about a scum. That is dangerous for scum, and I wouldn't blame scum for trying to off him before he figured out who to target.StorrZerg wrote:Again, if jonty is what he says, with him NOT shooting, mafia have nothing to fear of him. Specially if he wasn't even pushing on mafia day 1 (hey look who he pushed for the lynch)
Why would mafia waste a shot on him when they could be trying to hit other power roles???
that is if jonty is a threat to mafia...
if jonty is mafia, which i think he is.. then of course mafia wouldnt' target jonty...
Obviously this is your decision and I cannot force you to spill the beans but no other PR seems to be offering up even the slightest bit of a hint that they know something. Unless you're willing to supplement your vote against Jmac besides "based on his posts talking about lynching people from D1" I'm not voting Jmac based on that reasoning alone and now we're stuck on this jonty & jmac vs jak theme so far today..jak111 wrote:Of course I am holding back information, everyone with any type of power role or not claimed yet is holding back information. For now, I am waiting to see if the information I know needs to be known today or not. As of yet, I see no reason it needs to be known. (Same with everyone else who have talked and not given what they know yet).

This is what I dislike. It appears you have soft claimed a power role yet you have said from your own mouth that you have no relevant information to hang scum. Ordinarily that would be a great play if you are VT trying to draw fire but you get indignant that someone would dare suggest that.jak111 wrote:No worries, it's fine that they're both after me, it shows they don't want me to know something. I have already hinted at why I know what I know without fully explaining it.
However, you see how this turns out to be a bit correct. They are pushing harder to know HOW I know what I know. Leading me to believe one or both for possible scum.
Don't you find it odd how when Jonty says he will not kill, there is no mafia kill during the night? Whether the two kills are blocked or just chose not to kill is up for debate.
Not only that, but now that I go after Jmac, he's right there defending him?
I am not sure who the last mafia(s) are. But once we get one more out of the way, I'll explain the other threat to town that I am aware of.
