Re: World Cup of Risk! [Round 14]
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:35 am
Both teams should take the next chef that becomes a cc member.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=225627
We can bring in Zidane - 21....name is very French....last name could be yoshida to offset any concernsswimmerdude99 wrote:We will need a replacement for leverpuller on Japans team. He seems to have left the site!
I think we don't need a new player now when the tournament is almost over but we can reorganise our current players to cover Leverpuller's slots. We have some players who didn't yet reach maximal 3 games, me included. I notified our team captain rousseau72 about this issue, he will make the decision how to handle it.swimmerdude99 wrote:We will need a replacement for leverpuller on Japans team. He seems to have left the site!
Is this limitatiom using of minimum 8 players per a round or per tournament? Japan had 5 players left the site and is currently at 7 players so if limitation of minimum 8 players is per tournament then we have satisfied it but if it is per a round then we need to recruit 8th player for round 17 and for the playoffs.Each team should be composed of a minimum of 8 players and a maximum of 12.
I think it's important to have the minimum of 8 players going into the semi-finals. And you're free to add anyone you wish who hasn't participated for another team. Country of origin doesn't matter. Regarding the medal requirements, those were removed earlier on because of how many people were leaving the site and/or not wanting to play in the tournament anymore. Someone being added just prior to the playoffs, though, may be pushing that too much. I'm not saying that 100% for sure the new player will not get a medal, but it's something that would have to be discussed.josko.ri wrote: Is this limitatiom using of minimum 8 players per a round or per tournament? Japan had 5 players left the site and is currently at 7 players so if limitation of minimum 8 players is per tournament then we have satisfied it but if it is per a round then we need to recruit 8th player for round 17 and for the playoffs.
Ditto! Almost over now, though!niMic wrote:Feels like this tournament has lasted my entire life.
Hopefully no one has an issue with this. This game will serve as a tie-breaker and will not be counted in the 3 game max per player.The Semi-Finals and finals will also have a 7th game. Trips, no spoils, chained, fog in order to avoid ties.
_Untouchable wrote:Hi Groovy,
Can you confirm the score system still apply for the semi finals and finals:And that the additional trips only acts as a tie breaker (=1 pt)?
- Win a Doubles: 1 pt
- Win a Triples: 2 pts
- Win a Quads: 3 pts
(because if it's 2 pts, a tie is still possible)
Thanks!
Thanks for letting me know!mc05025 wrote:games are all finished...
Yeah the tournament was too long.rockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Nope its not the FrenchChariot of Fire wrote:Gotta fancy France to take this - they've been amazing all series. Have a great final all who are competing.
A tournament worth its salt to crown the best in a 'World Cup of Risk' can neither be brief nor easy. You do a great disservice to those who worked so hard to see it to the finish (to groovy...eternal respect).GoranZ wrote:Yeah the tournament was too long.rockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Nope its not the FrenchChariot of Fire wrote:Gotta fancy France to take this - they've been amazing all series. Have a great final all who are competing.
I do a great disservice by agreeing to your clan-mate that the tournament was too long? Is this a jokeChariot of Fire wrote:A tournament worth its salt to crown the best in a 'World Cup of Risk' can neither be brief nor easy. You do a great disservice to those who worked so hard to see it to the finish (to groovy...eternal respect).GoranZ wrote:Yeah the tournament was too long.rockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Playoff system is part of every World Cup. If you watch football you surely know that. So claiming that its unfair shows how little you know about Football. Maybe Cricket is better suited for youChariot of Fire wrote:If there was a flaw it was in France not winning. To have been the outstanding team throughout all those rounds - and by a considerable margin - only to lose out in a playoff system to a team that fared no better than 2nd-4th in the season...well that's unfair in my book.
Vive la France!
This comment just reeks of LOSERrockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Exactly.GoranZ wrote:I do a great disservice by agreeing to your clan-mate that the tournament was too long? Is this a jokeChariot of Fire wrote:A tournament worth its salt to crown the best in a 'World Cup of Risk' can neither be brief nor easy. You do a great disservice to those who worked so hard to see it to the finish (to groovy...eternal respect).GoranZ wrote:Yeah the tournament was too long.rockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Playoff system is part of every World Cup. If you watch football you surely know that. So claiming that its unfair shows how little you know about Football. Maybe Cricket is better suited for youChariot of Fire wrote:If there was a flaw it was in France not winning. To have been the outstanding team throughout all those rounds - and by a considerable margin - only to lose out in a playoff system to a team that fared no better than 2nd-4th in the season...well that's unfair in my book.
Vive la France!