Conquer Club

eddie2 wrote:
ok i have read the aod gg challenge thread there are some major concerns regarding all of this.

player deadbeating a game.
ok poker club was a remade game but why here is the rule covering this.

Missed Turns in a No Spoils Game
Missed turns in no spoils will not be scrutinized or result in any penalty (it is very rare for an advantage to be gained).

and this.

Deadbeating
Deadbeating will not be considered to be a deliberate act unless evidence is provided to the contrary (e.g. evidence of the player turns being taken in other games when they could have taken place in the game in question). As with deliberate missed turns / 'time outs', the opposing team will be automatically awarded a victory for the game in question if strong evidence is proivided. .

now none of the above 2 happened. what was offered was a remake or the win. but the option should also of fallen into the missing of turns where no punishment was issued. but this was not offered.

the we come to the late issueing of games.

If deadlines are not met for creating games then the Tournament Organiser will create random games (escalating, chained, sunny) and randomly assign invites to the relevent clan members (but giving the opposition the time they would normally have been provided with - see above). Failure of clan members to accept invites at this stage (or accept then drop) will result in the game being awarded to the opposition.

now dj's excuse for not following his own rules was several clans were late in the issueing of these. at this exact moment in time the rule has not been changed. so why was the punishment not issued during the war. dj is a tourney mod and if this had of happened during a tourney the organiser would of been in trouble for inacurate details. aod have every right to be angry at djs running of this event and i feel clan directors should be looking at weather there should be medals awarded because this mtourney has not been run according to the rules.

In spoils games, if a missed-turn or 'time out' appears to have deliberately occurred to gain an advantage, then the opposing team will be automatically awarded a victory for the game in question. In extreme circumstances, an appeal may be considered. Decisions will be at the discretion of the Tournamanet Organisers.

P.S. Thanks for joining the bitch-fest eddie. A man would join it himself rather than sending a henchman.

eggrollonedolla wrote:No predictions yet....interesting...

The Voice wrote:

eggrollonedolla wrote:No predictions yet....interesting...

I wouldn't be surprised to see MM vs. FOED in the finals. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised of much of anything lately.

QoH wrote:

The Voice wrote:

eggrollonedolla wrote:No predictions yet....interesting...

I wouldn't be surprised to see MM vs. FOED in the finals. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised of much of anything lately.

I actually would put e-money on PIGS... of course, I have a good chance of losing my e-dollars. But I think they have what it takes to upset FOED. Then again, if they beat FOED, I think they'll win it all.

DJ Teflon wrote:All games for the 3rd round have now been created,

Good luck to all

anonymus wrote:

DJ Teflon wrote:All games for the 3rd round have now been created,

Good luck to all

is it me who is a complete 'tard or is there no thread for our war? (or atleast no link to it)

/

Nola_Lifer wrote:Rules check. If a singles goes to 30 rounds then there is no winner for that game correct? So in which case someone could win the set 2-1?

Leehar wrote:why not use round limits to make sure it's decided by then?

Leehar wrote:Which is complex as hell, so just institute round limits so the game is decided by that point instead of making them draws needlessly?

Leehar wrote:Which is complex as hell, so just institute round limits so the game is decided by that point instead of making them draws needlessly?