Page 15 of 78

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:51 pm
by supercram
moz976 wrote:After reading things I think I see what Ice was pointing to as well.

I'm not entirely sure we can trust him it's possible it could be just a ploy.

But if we can trust it that would put a definite FOS pointing at autoload since he has bee going after him pretty hard.


exactly what i was thinking.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:57 pm
by moz976
Well based on my suspisions I am going to place my vote with autoload

As broom said this should give him plenty of time to defend himself if we are wrong.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:16 pm
by supercram
i will help you mount this pressure.

unvote dussle

vote autoload

autoload, please understand that i might be wrong, and i am willing to accept that you might be innocent. i just want to hear you out.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:28 pm
by supercram
1 of these 3 people, if not all 3 is almost certainly mafia:

dussle
autoload
bogusbet

i strongly suggest we lynch one of these 3 people.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:37 pm
by dagreatbroomhead
dussle wrote:
dagreatbroomhead wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:I think a no lynch would be a good move to sort of call the move by the mafia.

yeah, lets let the mafia do all the thinking and we’ll just sit back and die, that sounds fun.


Or an even better idea, let's kill a pro-townie by mistake, making the mafia's jobeasier, that sound's fun, too! :roll:


yeah your right, at the risk of killing an innocent townie we shouldn't kill anyone. and ya know what? i am never going outside again, its too dangerous. Man i also should stop doing all the dangerous things in my life like work, ya know, could get a paper cut or something, don't want that. Jezze my life is sooo much safer now that you put things in perspective for me. you never know, we could lynch someone and actually get a mafia. wow.

P.S. you think i am done. but i'm not.


wow, by your thinking, on day two, since no one might die again, we shouldn't kill anyone. Ohh thats right i've decided to stop talking because if i don't talk, i won't be killed because i'll never "mess up"!
[/end sarcasm]

serously, i bet someone already messed up, we just need to look hard enough to find it.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:55 pm
by wicked
Just pointing out people who are not posting much, in no particular order:

Machiavelli
Xenhu
Backglass
RK

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:57 pm
by supercram
...and bogusbet

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:15 pm
by AK_iceman
supercram wrote:1 of these 3 people, if not all 3 is almost certainly mafia:

dussle
autoload
bogusbet

i strongly suggest we lynch one of these 3 people.

I agree. But which one is most suspicious right now?

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:19 pm
by AK_iceman
dussle - Noob, so is prone to make mistakes by learning the game.
autoload - Has been going after me pretty hard with little to no evidence.
bogusbet - Hasn't posted much so looks a little suspicious.

I agree Autoload seems the most suspicious out of the three, but I am not ready to cast a vote yet.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:21 pm
by dussle
I'm glad that @ least someon realized I'm a dumb n00b. Autoload might be a sheriff, supercram's the one suspect, he's been throwing a lot of random accusations, seems desperate for a lynch.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:23 pm
by Backglass
wicked wrote:Just pointing out people who are not posting much, in no particular order:

Machiavelli
Xenhu
Backglass
RK


I'm here...just taking it all in. Cant we all just get along and wait until SCIENCE give us an option?

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:26 pm
by Freetymes
The kind of waffeling RK is doing smells to high hell. When he said these things he was simply going along with the way the conversation was going at the time. It seems to me that he may have been trying to get something going or help it along. That is fine but not when you argue for both ways. I think this is the kind of mistake we are looking for.

reverend_kyle wrote:Also, I feel that we should almost hastily lynch someone for the simple reason of we need to find out what is to come. If we spend forever in day 1 we aren't really going to know much of anything... which is why I've been posting less, is because everything is running us uncertain...


reverend_kyle wrote:I think a no lynch would be a good move to sort of call the move by the mafia.


That being said there seems to be a conection I do not see from the "Clues" left by him and AK. Just because I do not see the answer does not mean it is not there.
A couple of people that I think are trustable seem to think RK and AK are townies. I am totally willing to listen as I stated before but I want to hear more.

My vote stays for now but it is not in stone.

I will get back on line this evening. Till then keep digging!!

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:26 pm
by AK_iceman
Backglass wrote:I'm here...just taking it all in. Cant we all just get along and wait until SCIENCE give us an option?

What does this mean and when will it happen?

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:31 pm
by Backglass
AK_iceman wrote:
Backglass wrote:I'm here...just taking it all in. Cant we all just get along and wait until SCIENCE give us an option?

What does this mean and when will it happen?


I wish I knew...but I trust in Science.

After all, I am a High School Science teacher...and a DAMN GOOD ONE! :P

BTW: I heard about the safe houses on my small portable radio and brought it with me along with my belongings to the Generator Complex...which was nearest my house.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:32 pm
by AK_iceman
Backglass wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:
Backglass wrote:I'm here...just taking it all in. Cant we all just get along and wait until SCIENCE give us an option?

What does this mean and when will it happen?


I wish I knew...but I trust in Science.

After all, I am a High School Science teacher...and a DAMN GOOD ONE! :P

BTW: I heard about the safe houses on my small portable radio and brought it with me along with my belongings to the Generator Complex...which was nearest my house.

So why was SCIENCE capitalized? Are you trying to send a message to someone without everyone else knowing? Or do you have information you aren't sharing?

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
by wicked
dagreatbroomhead wrote:keep in mind that anything the town can figure out the mafia can. So if every townie can figure it out every mafia can aswell.


Not necessarily. If that was the case, IC would've just come out and said it. Townies have the advantage of figuring things out by pieces of clues given in their roles, which when put together make sense, and mafia are usually not privy to. Not every townie can figure out IC's "clue", I for one can't, and I'm guessing others can't either, but it seems enough have.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:36 pm
by wicked
Well backglass seems to know something, and keeps repeating the same message: SCIENCE and DAMN GOOD ONE.

Back, what do YOU propose we do?

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:38 pm
by Backglass
AK_iceman wrote:So why was SCIENCE capitalized? Are you trying to send a message to someone without everyone else knowing? Or do you have information you aren't sharing?


No messages...no subterfuge. I'm not a secret agent captain, I'm just a country science teacher! AND A DAMN GOOD ONE!

:lol:

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:40 pm
by Backglass
wicked wrote:Well backglass seems to know something, and keeps repeating the same message: SCIENCE and DAMN GOOD ONE.

Back, what do YOU propose we do?


Like I said earlier...we dont know who is infect or not. I propose that, rather than kill off one of our own, we should wait and see what revelations come the next morning.

And the names BYRON! :lol:

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:43 pm
by Phobia
ohhh why did i not join this? i really want to say something but i cannot!...ill go away now

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:44 pm
by AK_iceman
that makes you Look just a little suspicious. On the other hand you Could be just Kidding around. Not really a good thing to do as Everyone coulD take you seRiously. Other than that, what can you telL us about sciencE?

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:46 pm
by wicked
I'm not entirely convinced a no lynch vote is a bad idea. Since healthies outnumber infecteds right now, the chances of actually lynching an infected are LOW, while the chances of lynching a healthy townies are HIGH. I've got to go with statistics here. Only Mafia would be pressing hard against a no lynch.


UNVOTE DUSSLE
VOTE NO LYNCH

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:49 pm
by wicked
Phobia!! lol you crack me up, mr penguin!! :lol:

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:52 pm
by Phobia
wicked wrote:Phobia!! lol you crack me up, mr penguin!! :lol:


wait just one more post....wicked has finally realised im a male! this is the beginning of a new era ;)

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:53 pm
by wicked
so science may be the key to unlocking the vaccination problems, eh??