Greater China [Quenched] (thanks Widowmakers)

Gozar · Post by **Gozar** » Sat May 05, 2007 10:10 am

How about "The New War" since this is supposedly the future, what with the wall down and all...?

jennifermarie · Post by **jennifermarie** » Sat May 05, 2007 10:23 am

my only problem with it is that the blue of Nei Mongol, Hebei, and Shanxi, and the blue of the ocean are a bit too similar to be that close together. Maybe use brown instead, and change plain brown area with no countries to that blue? Other than that, it looks wonderful.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 05, 2007 2:46 pm

jennifermarie wrote:my only problem with it is that the blue of Nei Mongol, Hebei, and Shanxi, and the blue of the ocean are a bit too similar to be that close together. Maybe use brown instead, and change plain brown area with no countries to that blue? Other than that, it looks wonderful.

why is that a problem? you can see it even if you are color blind because of the black line

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 05, 2007 2:47 pm

Gozar wrote:How about "The New War" since this is supposedly the future, what with the wall down and all...?

i already know a name

but thnx

are there any other things exept the name???

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat May 05, 2007 3:31 pm

you want feedback,ok lets se.
1.Army circle have shadows and look like fly over map,remove shadows.
2.You have 1 terittory without names.
3.Names of terittory its very bright,put to be more darken.
4.Army circles very small for numbers,must put to be standard 24,or 25px.
5.Bonuses box-Names of country also very bright,put to be more darken.
6.Title can be more big,because you have very large empty space up.
7.In some places you have darken and bright borders(Look Korea borders)
8.Yours signature is very small,but ofcourse is yours decision i belive.
9.China wall-must be more profesional look, now these not like any wall.
10.Rivers, must bee same colours like ocean, to better present water.
11.Territory borders-In Shaanxi and Shanxi you erase borders.
12.Flag,Titlle and box have shadow and China Insignia dont have shadows.
13.Arows of route attack is very bright.
14. Well these for now,i hope that you agree with these strictly profesional point of my view on yours map.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 05, 2007 3:56 pm

qwert wrote:you want feedback,ok lets se.
1.Army circle have shadows and look like fly over map,remove shadows.
2.You have 1 terittory without names.
3.Names of terittory its very bright,put to be more darken.
4.Army circles very small for numbers,must put to be standard 24,or 25px.
5.Bonuses box-Names of country also very bright,put to be more darken.
6.Title can be more big,because you have very large empty space up.
7.In some places you have darken and bright borders(Look Korea borders)
8.Yours signature is very small,but ofcourse is yours decision i belive.
9.China wall-must be more profesional look, now these not like any wall.
10.Rivers, must bee same colours like ocean, to better present water.
11.Territory borders-In Shaanxi and Shanxi you erase borders.
12.Flag,Titlle and box have shadow and China Insignia dont have shadows.
13.Arows of route attack is very bright.
14. Well these for now,i hope that you agree with these strictly profesional point of my view on yours map.

1. i think it looks good

and senate map has them too
2. i know, did that on purpose, called it \\\ in the xml
3. my whole map is bright so thats why i decided to make the font also bright
4. why do they need to be bigger? this looks better and they fit quite well

5. as i said my whole map is bright

6. well i tried that but it didn't look good
7. i know that is the unplayable land, but i can put the border there if you like it more

i will post a picture of that
8. yup my signature isn't important
9. i tried to make it as good as i could do and then it also had to be flat, i don't know how i could improve it
10. hmm the sea is always a different color then the rivers isn't it?
11. i know i did that because now you can see the names better
12. yeah it didn't look good with a shadow so i did this
13. finely someone says whats wrong with the arrows, thnnx i will change them

14. thanks for your comment

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat May 05, 2007 4:52 pm

Well i must say that bright maps is not good for play, please reconsider these. :wink:

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Sat May 05, 2007 4:54 pm

This isn't bright. In fact it is kind of pale.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sun May 06, 2007 3:22 am

i rather call it soft

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 12, 2007 5:17 am

update:

xml

removed name under china, i think it is better without it
changed arrows

here qwert for you the one with a border, i don't like it very much:

Please give me feedback i donno what else to do
at least this map is fisnihed 90-100%

t.e.c · Post by **t.e.c** » Sat May 12, 2007 5:42 am

some of the army numbers look high and to the left

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 12, 2007 5:48 am

t.e.c wrote:some of the army numbers look high and to the left

they may look like it but they are all on the same place in the circle at the same pixel

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sat May 12, 2007 5:50 am

Wisse wrote:
t.e.c wrote:some of the army numbers look high and to the left

they may look like it but they are all on the same place in the circle at the same pixel

something you'll learn in an ethics class.

avoid any appearance of imperfection. so even if it looks like it might have something bad in it try and avoid that look because people will think that true or not.

t.e.c · Post by **t.e.c** » Sat May 12, 2007 5:51 am

so if you move them down they will look too low?

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 12, 2007 6:00 am

t.e.c wrote:so if you move them down they will look too low?

yup i can't make it better than this

t.e.c · Post by **t.e.c** » Sat May 12, 2007 6:01 am

righto, it's looking good then. let's play! :wink:

LoeNY · Post by **LoeNY** » Sat May 12, 2007 11:26 am

lol At the end, you decided not to have a name. So the Great Wall question remains "why is there one way from Mongolia into china?".

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat May 12, 2007 12:40 pm

i realy dont understan what these no name terittory present, can you please explane to me.
As borders of unplayabile terittory, just put to be same like others.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:42 pm

ericleung wrote:lol At the end, you decided not to have a name. So the Great Wall question remains "why is there one way from Mongolia into china?".

yup

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:44 pm

qwert wrote:i realy dont understan what these no name terittory present, can you please explane to me.
As borders of unplayabile terittory, just put to be same like others.

that country is a defense country (see first page on this topic) i still need a function for it, the new xml would help a lot (new xml options)

i put up a poll for the border

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:46 pm

Still unsure about that mystery country...

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:49 pm

i won't put a name to that country but i must find an option for it, i hope lack makes xml options pretty fast

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Sat May 12, 2007 2:57 pm

It's territory disputed with India, right? So call it Disputed.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat May 12, 2007 3:01 pm

You dont need these poll, because is normal that all terittory borders been same, OK i pul my opinion back, because when people see that these is my opinion will vote against me.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat May 12, 2007 3:11 pm

qwert wrote:You dont need these poll, because is normal that all terittory borders been same, OK i pul my opinion back, because when people see that these is my opinion will vote against me.

i don't hope people would do that,

but i only left the black border in the playable land because otherways color-blind people would have problems