Conquer Club

Posted: **Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:07 am**

Quench Quench Quench!

Posted: **Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:52 pm**

Quench time. 1 Pixel doesn't matter to the avarege gamer

Posted: **Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:48 pm**

for dummies wrote:Quench time. 1 Pixel doesn't matter to the avarege gamer

It's not that hard to fix and I don't think there's any point in getting lazy with map making now. We want the quality of maps to keep improving, not getting worse. :wink:

Posted: **Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:10 pm**

I hate to break it to you Keyogi, but 1 pixel of difference does not discernibly change the quality of the map. Please stop holding up good maps. It takes far too long for new maps to make it to full playability. Thanks.

Posted: **Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:18 pm**

one pixel here one there a few gameplay issues next and pretty soon we'll have just rough drafts that get quenched.
if a standard was set then just follow that standard.

Posted: **Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:59 pm**

DiM
one pixel here one there a few gameplay issues next and pretty soon we'll have just rough drafts that get quenched.
if a standard was set then just follow that standard.

Well,if oaktown map quenched and hes numbers not centralised, then these map also deserve to be quenched.

Posted: **Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:13 pm**

Bump

-X

Posted: **Sun Mar 18, 2007 11:38 am**

It's not getting Quenched until Fitz comes back.

So you can all shut it.

Also Qwert, take your trolling out of the Foundry.

--Andy

Posted: **Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:50 pm**

Also Qwert, take your trolling out of the Foundry.

I dont understand what these word mean?

Posted: **Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:40 am**

Fitz69 wrote:I've been trying some different approaches and what I'm realising is that the best result I can get is still the one visible on page 18.
Knowing what I do now, I'd be able to do better if I started from scratch (no no no..).
If anyone else wants to take a shot at optimizing the xml, please do so. The maps and code are here in the forum.

Regarding the opposites in the lobby. All lobbies do not have their corresponding opposites. Wont that stick out more if we start pairing the others?

well, imoff to bed to face more feverinduced crap....

damn flu

Well, I'm back. That flu hit hard.
Read the quote above as to what I've managed to do regading the centralization. I just can't get it perfect.

As to the name thing, is it an official change request?

Posted: **Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:42 am**

Maps:
http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p192 ... ate600.jpg
http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p192 ... ate800.jpg

Posted: **Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:25 am**

I think the names of the Senators sound funny. They should be mostly white male names. Kenny, Zoe, Kyle, Lola, Suki, all sound like its some kind of teenage hang out. Why no pull the first names of real senators, like, oh i dunno, Bernard, Sheldon, Arlen, Frank, Herb, and other crotchety names. If your going to have really lobbyist and media, it seems a little silly to have make believe senators.

Posted: **Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:47 am**

mibi wrote:I think the names of the Senators sound funny. They should be mostly white male names. Kenny, Zoe, Kyle, Lola, Suki, all sound like its some kind of teenage hang out. Why no pull the first names of real senators, like, oh i dunno, Bernard, Sheldon, Arlen, Frank, Herb, and other crotchety names. If your going to have really lobbyist and media, it seems a little silly to have make believe senators.

I think we had this argument a long time back and somehow more varied (less American) names won.

Posted: **Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:09 pm**

I dont see nothing bad in these map.

Posted: **Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:34 pm**

Coleman wrote:
mibi wrote:I think the names of the Senators sound funny. They should be mostly white male names. Kenny, Zoe, Kyle, Lola, Suki, all sound like its some kind of teenage hang out. Why no pull the first names of real senators, like, oh i dunno, Bernard, Sheldon, Arlen, Frank, Herb, and other crotchety names. If your going to have really lobbyist and media, it seems a little silly to have make believe senators.

I think we had this argument a long time back and somehow more varied (less American) names won.

ah well. its no big deal.

Posted: **Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:10 pm**

I personally like the big map better. The small version looks kinda cramped.

Other than that, nice job! Can't wait till it gets quenched!

Posted: **Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:39 pm**

Seriously, what's holding this thing up?

Posted: **Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:45 pm**

andy, how long is this from geting on the site?

Posted: **Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:10 pm**

if it means getting this map incorporated into the site quicker, then feel free to ignore this.

my only complaint about the map is that the names of the senators seem out of place from the otherwise-clever territories. if you're looking for more appropriate names for the seats, use the states that always side democrat (cali, new y, new england ones in general) and states that always side republican (texas, georgia, kentucky). i'm confident that you could easily find 14 of each.

Posted: **Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:15 pm**

The name arguments occurred and were resolved long ago. One of the things in the foundry is that you shouldn't bring up stuff that has already been driven into the ground.

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:14 pm**

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:53 pm**

How much longer?

Posted: **Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:04 pm**

Well I sent Andy a PM about something on the 20th and he still hasn't been online to receive it so it is hard to say.

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2007 4:13 pm**

Alright, sorry, real life came up for two days!

Anyways, lets have the links to the latest versions of the map, along with a link to the XML.

--Andy

Posted: **Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:10 pm**

Musta been awesome, Andy! Real like for two whole days! :wink:

Conquer Club

Senate Map [Quenched]