Moderator: Tournament Directors



Have to agree on this one.ddgrimes wrote:I vote to never have conquer man map in any tourney.
Kills BOB, takes forever to make 1 move.







Well from the choice of not having the last round or choosing of having 3 way doubles or not I chose not to have 3 way doubles in the last round, we can have 4 games with 2 teams and 2 games with 4 teams in the last round so the splitting of the games with 8 teams left is possible and there is no need to award free points.With the last 8 teams, in round 4 we need to play triples.
Yes, my bad there, we are at round 9 now and 4 more teams will be eliminated so it will leave 12 teams, so we will have 2 more rounds to play after round 9 and it will be 11 rounds total.And I am not sure where did you get the 13 rounds from? Maybe from the original post, when i was planning to get 60 teams, but i didn't, so we had to shorten it.
This is not only about my team, yes we are 15 points behind and very little chance to win, but with the 9th round still on and 2 more to go all is possible, but my concern is also about the teams above me and with much more chance to catch first place, it will not be fear to them to cut 1 round.Currently between you and the leader there are 15 points. Even if they got 0 points on the whole round and you got the maximum avaiable (3*1+2*3+4), you still will fall short of the first place.
I do not agree much here, with 13 points awarded por round at least 4 teams are in to compete for a win. We are in the middle of round 9 now, so a lot of points are not done yet + 1 more round with 13 points on the line for each team and if we play the last round like I suggested there will be 12 more points available for grabs with out counting for the -1 possible in the 4 team games.I agree with you that shortening the round might seem like a too late of the notice, but we are not in the situation of the tight finish, we have a very clear leader in sight

Well, considering a change of plan in a tourney by not playing the last round, do you think that all players left in the last 8 teams should vote for the best solution? I am sure team in first place will vote not to play but do you think that those players left have earned at least the chance to vote? Not trying to be disrespectful to you, I know you worked hard to put this together but also the team in second place that could win such a huge tournament worked hard to get there, all players should be respected and have earned a right to vote?Thanks, for your post Gecko, I will consider it.
We could play 3 then, I see you can't split the games that way, still better then none.Having 4 rounds of doubles is definitely not an option though.
No doubt, but here the choice is not to play doubles or triples, the choice is to not play at all the last round, I rather play only the doubles and the 4 way games in the last round then not playing it at all.And doubles and triples are considerably different in the strategy.
Is it possible to take in consideration a vote for the last round options? Only 16 people left and we can post here what are the possible options and people can vote, could this be the best option? Make it even easier, 1 vote por team, just 8 votes to decide, the most voted option is applied, very easy and fear to all.It either has to be byes or not playing the round at all. I might be able to get away with having just 1 bye, instead 4. Let me think about it...

