I'm asking about Wing because in
this post, you make three scum reads, and one town read on Tim. (And no town read on Wing, you don't even mention him even though he accused and voted you in his previous post.) Wing claims having the post restriction on the next page, and after a few posts you finally start to specifically counter Wing's arguments (because IB asked you to), I'm taking that as a reference point for "destroying the case". Your statement of not destroying Wing's case on you because of your town read on him doesn't make sense timing-wise. Yeah, I guess you make a few posts between Wing's PR-claim and your breakdown of Wing's case on you, but now you say you read him town before he even revealed his PR, while your play says otherwise.
After Wing reveals the PR you initially say:
"Does your PR make you my lyncher Wing? Because it seems to be all you ever talk about. Your post before this one wasn't even worth addressing. This one skims half of my post and edits half of the rest."
You're town-reading Wing who skims half your posts and edits half the rest? (Even though he doesn't...) Why even accuse him of being a lyncher if you think he's town? Doesn't make sense.
You're town-reading Wing but don't think his first post about you was worth addressing? If you're town reading him, you should have made it a point to address them. If you think Wing is town, you should be putting effort towards him reading you town as well. This is especially true since Wing thought you were scum, right? If you know Wing from any other game, you know he doesn't let go easily. If you town-read Wing you should've let him have a better read at you, but instead you ignore him completely. Doesn't make sense.
You say you town read him now, which is easy because he's accusing you; it's just a reverse-OMGUS. (Oh my god, you rock?) And you say that you have town read him earlier but your posts are actually ignoring and antagonising him. It looks more like you're looking to get sympathy-town points because "I town read Wing all along", but your posts from the frame in which you claim to have town read Wing don't match up.
It doesn't even matter if Wing is town at this point, your claim of town reading him doesn't fit your early plays. I think you're trying to spin a story around Wing=town in your favour and use it to get the wagon off you, but the thread history tells a different tale. I think you're lying about your early read on Wing and changing your position after the fact, so I have to
vote Strike.
Concerning the mason-related focus on Streaker, I guess I would have just played that differently, I can't read your mind. But if you are scum, I suppose you would use a mason differently than if you were town. But if you flip scum I guess the case against Streaker is less damning, since a few of his early plays seem to have been in support of yours, not necessarily with criminal intent... I guess we'll deal with it tomorrow. There's probably a lot more going on there.
But I do think they may have something to gain if Streaker gets lynched instead of Strike...