Page 113 of 208
Again
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:49 pm
by Prankcall
I cleared 3.5k again..This makes 12x now
Re: Again
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:35 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Prankcall wrote:I cleared 3.5k again..This makes 12x now
now you answered your own question
3.5k yet again
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:22 am
by Prankcall
I've now reached it 13x..Thx that's 13x for 3.5k
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:20 pm
by AAFitz
I have the beginning of the ideas for a category here....
Top 5 most all around players...
Based on all of the options offered by CC, and who plays the most variety... possibly based on a percentage of their own games, or weighted by number somehow
It would take some work, My guess is JR would top the list, but there are a few that even he doesnt play, including the entire speed category so that could affect the outcome... I play a good variety too, but again there are maps, and types I hardly play... including assasin....
It may be too complex for this thread, but it would be interesting to see the players who really change it up quite a bit... it would have to include players over 500 games I would think though, or the percentages would be too easy to skew...
anyone interested in this???
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:21 pm
by ParadiceCity9
Re: 3.5k yet again
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:21 pm
by poo-maker
Prankcall wrote:I've now reached it 13x..Thx that's 13x for 3.5k
I saw a couple pages back that you deleted some of the more biased and unnecessary top 5's and 1st 5's- Blitz. This should have been one of them...
No-Way
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:04 am
by Prankcall
Bah..Just cuz ur so far above it doesnt mean we all are
Re: No-Way
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:02 pm
by poo-maker
Prankcall wrote:Bah..Just cuz ur so far above it doesnt mean we all are
Not really what i'm getting at prank. I mean, this particular list just gives a rough estimate as to how many games people have spent around the 3450-3550 mark.
Fine
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:22 pm
by Prankcall
honestly dont bother me one bit if he removes it..
Re: No-Way
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:06 pm
by AAFitz
poo-maker wrote:Prankcall wrote:Bah..Just cuz ur so far above it doesnt mean we all are
Not really what i'm getting at prank. I mean, this particular list just gives a rough estimate as to how many games people have spent around the 3450-3550 mark.
well, that particular stat does as much say how many times a player dropped from 3500 too so it is a misnomer...
if there was one for whos gone from major to seargent the most, i wouldnt be surprised if im on the list... but I wouldnt say thats necessarily a positive stat...
Lists
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 5:23 pm
by Prankcall
Ok..I know i am making some list now? I peaked at a score of 4048 im sure that good for 5th best..Also i made 4k in 1921 games..Lost a game so i dropped from 4048 to 4020 but if u review my last game u will see the math.. and i also believe i qualify for the 4k quickest days list with 241 thats good for 3rd..thx sir
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:55 pm
by Hotdoggie
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:17 am
by Hotdoggie
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:51 pm
by Blitzaholic
AAFitz wrote:I have the beginning of the ideas for a category here....
Top 5 most all around players...
Based on all of the options offered by CC, and who plays the most variety... possibly based on a percentage of their own games, or weighted by number somehow
It would take some work, My guess is JR would top the list, but there are a few that even he doesnt play, including the entire speed category so that could affect the outcome... I play a good variety too, but again there are maps, and types I hardly play... including assasin....
It may be too complex for this thread, but it would be interesting to see the players who really change it up quite a bit... it would have to include players over 500 games I would think though, or the percentages would be too easy to skew...
anyone interested in this???
you make me laugh
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:53 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Re: No-Way
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:54 pm
by Blitzaholic
poo-maker wrote:Prankcall wrote:Bah..Just cuz ur so far above it doesnt mean we all are
Not really what i'm getting at prank. I mean, this particular list just gives a rough estimate as to how many games people have spent around the 3450-3550 mark.
good point poo, I may delete this too very soon, it really is not a relevant one as the others, ty
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:04 pm
by AAFitz
lol... i wasnt saying that playing all the different types made some one better...only that they played them...
i just thought it would be interesting to see who played all the different types... winning wasnt important, and certainly skill didnt mean much...
just another useless stat really, relax guys
it says
most all around... not
best all around...
This obviously got misunderstood. The idea was to take the percentage of who plays the most variety... skill doesnt even factor into it, if wins arent counted
i used JR as an example because hes played 7000 games, and everyone knows who he is... im not suggesting hes the better or worse than anyone
the idea is to see a list of people who have played the widest range of games... all around... I thought it was clear... wins could be factored in, but wouldnt be 100% necessary unless we wanted them...
it would be nearly as relevant as posts or feedback, but might be interesting to see who played them most variety... i actually am guessing its 5 random players who just happen to play everything...
Did anyone understand what I was going for here....
JR, i only used you as an example because youve played 7000 games.... I actually doubt youd be in the top 5 of this list... i bet it would be someone random, who plays a bunch of every single type
The idea was to post some criteria, and find out... i think it would be interesting to see who played almost everything... Im not sure anyone knows who that is right now, which is why I came up with the idea.
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:19 pm
by Blitzaholic
AAFitz wrote:lol... i wasnt saying that playing all the different types made some one better...only that they played them...
i just thought it would be interesting to see who played all the different types... winning wasnt important, and certainly skill didnt mean much...
just another useless stat really, relax guys
it says
most all around... not
best all around...
This obviously got misunderstood. The idea was to take the percentage of who plays the most variety... skill doesnt even factor into it, if wins arent counted
i used JR as an example because hes played 7000 games, and everyone knows who he is... im not suggesting hes the better or worse than anyone
the idea is to see a list of people who have played the widest range of games... all around... I thought it was clear... wins could be factored in, but wouldnt be 100% necessary unless we wanted them...
it would be nearly as relevant as posts or feedback, but might be interesting to see who played them most variety... i actually am guessing its 5 random players who just happen to play everything...
Did anyone understand what I was going for here....

JR, i only used you as an example because youve played 7000 games.... I actually doubt youd be in the top 5 of this list... i bet it would be someone random, who plays a bunch of every single type
The idea was to post some criteria, and find out... i think it would be interesting to see who played almost everything... Im not sure anyone knows who that is right now, which is why I came up with the idea.
makes more sense to me now AAfitzer, ty for the clarification, I apologize, I got perplexed, so busy lately, tootles.
Re: 3.5k yet again
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:41 pm
by Blitzaholic
poo-maker wrote:Prankcall wrote:I've now reached it 13x..Thx that's 13x for 3.5k
I saw a couple pages back that you deleted some of the more biased and unnecessary top 5's and 1st 5's- Blitz. This should have been one of them...
OK DELETED it POO and sorry prankcall: you, me and rest are off this now, but prankcall you did get on 3 other lists if you want to refer to page # 1 congratz, ty all again and filtered many out.
ok with revamps jr and I got crushed the most and I lost 10 and jr lost 6 that got all deleted and wiped out, so the new top 5's and 1st 5's with the MOST 5's are now:
1. blitzaholic 29
2. johnnyrocket24 12
3. skyt 9
4. comic boy 7
4. alstergren 7
4. sjnap 7
next ones are:
7. poo-maker 5
7. aafitz 5
7. gibbom 5
7. eye84free 5
too many to name with 1, 2, 3, and 4
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:52 pm
by ParadiceCity9
ParadiceCity9 wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1819778
12 seconds
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:31 am
by Blitzaholic
Hotdoggie wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1830043
13 secs
5th place is 12 seconds now
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:32 am
by Blitzaholic
Hotdoggie wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1826059
2008-02-15 23:51:32 - morfam1 gains 389 points
ty hotdoggie
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:06 am
by Blitzaholic
will be adding soon
1st 5 to win 100 assassin games/julia gulia and paradicecity9
1st 5 to win 100 terminator games/wacicha
1st 5 to win 100 quads games/no one
1st 5 to Trifecta 3K score/posts/games/blitzaholic
1st 5 to 5000 games played/jr, clapper and asap paradicecity9
1st 5 to 400 positive feedbacks/jr and clapper
1st 5 to Quadmania 2K score/posts/games/feedback/blitz/aafitz
1st 5 to 20,000 posts/asap fircoal
top 5 most rounds played/nuke/jr/blitz/others
top 5 most total armies on a map/nuke/misterman/paradicecity/h2sy
other ideas?
If others want to make some lists, here your chance, some of these ideas, i do not think anyone has filled all 5 slots, but it is lists of 5, so get cracking all

some are filling
updated
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:58 am
by Blitzaholic
how many was it jr, who was in the game with you, i looked but screen was white
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:49 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Blitzaholic wrote:how many was it jr, who was in the game with you, i looked but screen was white
comic boy ( 74-0 )
JOHNNYROCKET24 ( 505-13 )
sjnap ( 58-0 )
Scott-Land ( 155-3 )
Naato ( 26-1 )
austex ( 47-0 )