Conquer Club

MeDeFe wrote:

clapper011 wrote:keep it on topic. Frigidus, pimpdave any others that don't agree with this thread..tough luck.... either stop entering into this thread or deal... continue to bring it off topic and you will serve your punishments. Harsh? maybe..but obviously asking you guys nicely to stop derailing this topic isn't working.

clapper, I may be breaking an internet taboo here by explicitly stating it, but how much fun would this thread be if the only things being posted were picture of anthropomorphic animals and comments on how great the latest picture is, regardless of what its artistic merits are? Not very much fun. As it is we have two opposing viewpoints on a topic that no one takes very seriously so there's no real risk of saying anything offensive, this thread is pretty much an embodiment of "much ado about nothing". Would you really take that away from us?

sheepofdumb wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:But surely not as seriously as, say, a thread about the intensity cubes being non-random or gun laws.

Oh no, not neatly as serious as one of those threads. Which need to gtfo my forums. Go debate in a place where people are more likely to flame you. That's where you all belong.

sheepofdumb wrote:Lucario, you attention whoring fur fag, knock it off. This is not what furry is about and if you think it is then you are a lost cause. Furries are a communities of artists (mostly) that enjoy anthropomorphic animals. Of course there are real a-holes here like lucario that enjoy furry p0rn and watching people vomit when they show others. Yes there is a fetish involved which is unfortunate because it has caused the media to really put down furries and spin us as sex starved furverts. When none of it turned out to be true they turned away, not making amends for the harsh accusations they made earlier. Are furries a little strange? Sure, we all have our quirks. Now that you've seen my quirk, albeit the perverted form of it, what's yours?

Fircoal wrote:

sheepofdumb wrote:Lucario, you attention whoring fur fag, knock it off. This is not what furry is about and if you think it is then you are a lost cause. Furries are a communities of artists (mostly) that enjoy anthropomorphic animals. Of course there are real a-holes here like lucario that enjoy furry p0rn and watching people vomit when they show others. Yes there is a fetish involved which is unfortunate because it has caused the media to really put down furries and spin us as sex starved furverts. When none of it turned out to be true they turned away, not making amends for the harsh accusations they made earlier. Are furries a little strange? Sure, we all have our quirks. Now that you've seen my quirk, albeit the perverted form of it, what's yours?

well the fetish isn't really bad, as I do have it to an extent, but the problem is when people just impose it on other people. I have my furry fetish (usually combined with my other fetishes) but I'm not really that militant about it. I mean is there really a problem if you don't make a problem? I enjoy furry art in general and my more fetished/sexual ones. Are either really wrong if I keep them to who enjoy them?

MeDeFe wrote:Bump!


Does anyone still remember this furry?

[bigimg]http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/867/ecdc4a38a9ad6511.jpg[/bigimg]

MeDeFe wrote:I think she's properly spelled "Cheetara".

Lucarilover240 wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:I think she's properly spelled "Cheetara".

Right, sorry.

I blame the fact that the show went off the air about 10 years ago.

MeDeFe wrote:In any case, I liked Wilykit way better than Cheetara back then.

Yes, this picture is totally stolen from one of the comics and no I do not have a bad conscience about that.

[bigimg]http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/6718/wilykit.jpg[/bigimg]