Page 12 of 12
Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES ROUND 7
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 8:39 am
by Big Whiskey
Big Whiskey wrote:Donkey/Greycloak--------5 prismsaber/agonzos-----------3 1 games left
BW/Blitz--------------------5 endar1077/jj3044-------------4 **
David Wain/Andrew-------3 CandaVespin/bamage---------2 4 games left
hiddendragon/littlebrother2k7---5 AMGecko/tyche73-----4 **
I guess there is no reason to play the 8th round.Donkey and Greycloak can not be knocked out of 1st place.When this round ends Donkey and Greycloak will be tourney champs.Congrats to you both
All u have to do is read pal.
Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES-See 1st Post For Winners
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:30 pm
by endar1077
Big Whiskey wrote:Big Whiskey wrote:Donkey/Greycloak--------5 prismsaber/agonzos-----------3 1 games left
BW/Blitz--------------------5 endar1077/jj3044-------------4 **
David Wain/Andrew-------3 CandaVespin/bamage---------2 4 games left
hiddendragon/littlebrother2k7---5 AMGecko/tyche73-----4 **
I guess there is no reason to play the 8th round.Donkey and Greycloak can not be knocked out of 1st place.When this round ends Donkey and Greycloak will be tourney champs.Congrats to you both
All u have to do is read pal.
Okay, first of all, I'm not your pal, buddy.
Second of all, you're quoting a post from the second to last page, so why would I have read it? If you are under the impression that people read all the posts in the tourney thread, you are sadly mistaken. The head post is where updates go, and your score there doesn't mention it. The PM announcing the winners probably should have, but whatever. I guess that's about how things have been going in the whole way in this tournament.
I came to resent this tournament about halfway through (separate from our little confrontations and whatnot) because I realized that the whole premise is a points scheme. Why would you have a tournament decided by points in which the top team just continues to bash the person on the bottom repeatedly unless to suck points out of them? I suppose it isn't for sure that this was on your mind when you made the tourney this way. I'd be curious to know what the idea was, actually.
In any case, I don't recommend it for future tourneys, in case you plan to do more. It stopped being exciting after the third round or so, because it was structured to give the advantage to the team already in the lead.
Re: *^Masters of Doubles [Winners: Donkey & Greycloak]
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 10:46 pm
by Big Whiskey
Ok pal,,if u can do better,than please do..take care
Re: *^Masters of Doubles [Winners: Donkey & Greycloak]
Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 9:13 am
by endar1077
Lol, no need. AndrewB already did. Now that's a well structured and well-run tournament.