Conquer Club

Posted: **Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:51 pm**

Yes, but how do you tell him he's too phattscotty?

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:53 am**

[Long Post between Haggis and PS]

show

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:02 am**

Neoteny wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Neoteny wrote:I'm not sure which part of "I won't dignify the surreal absurdity you call a 'worldview' by engaging it" you don't understand. I will continue describing your perspectives as "non-reality based" and "childlike" because they are accurate descriptors. I would be offended that you think I'm resorting to name calling if I weren't so used to you distorting everything through your kafkaesque kaleidoscope of hatred and smug self righteousness. I reserve the name calling for people I actually like.

sooo....you're gonna troll me??? Great plan

whatever, freak

SO! WE RESORT TO NAME CALLING?!

You know, you're right, Scotty. I haven't mentioned your hypocrisy yet. Thanks for bringing it up.

Also, I'm not trolling you. I'm trying to convince others to stop gracing you with any leeway to present your malignant scare tactics and lies. You don't deserve it. Just because someone is saying things you don't like doesn't mean they are trolling you. I'm being 100% serious and accurate when I say you show a distinct lack of intellectual maturity and have a negative effect on this forum. However, instead of whining at the mods until you're banned, I prefer the more democratic process of encouraging everyone to treat you as you should be treated. That way you know that you are a societal reject, and not some sort of deranged martyr. God knows we have enough of those.

I support this.

Neoteny is an anarchic enforcer of a certain set of informal, social rules. Here we see anarcho-capitalism, or market anarchy, occurring.

Neoteny is making a good case for others to realize the actual value of the average PS post. Apparently, it's working, and PS is confirming Neo's and Haggi's claims unintentionally, thus significantly devaluing his own posts. The only thing that could save PS in the short-term would be a huge bailout of credibility and integrity, which have yet to be transferable, take too much time to develop, and require an excellent marketing campaign featuring positive statements by [your favorite person] in support of Phatscotty.

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:23 am**

So, it has come to this. We have two options.

Cutting dick

The conservative/emo option involves a draconian cut in yearly Phatscotty dickishness. This is justified by the fact that forum dick has been at a surplus for years, and barring a huge influx in gay men, this surplus can only lead to dangerous inflation.

Huge dick

The liberal/Ron Jeremy option involves an increase in dickishness toward Phatscotty, incentivized by Saxibucks and social reinforcement. This would flood the market with swinging dicks in an attempt to crowd out the less effective phallus among us. Bonus: might also weird out Chick-Fil-A a little bit.

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:18 pm**

Lootifer wrote:
john9blue wrote:i thought it was: first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win

but the liberals here have a different method: first they fight you, then you win, then they realize that they've lost and pretend to laugh while running away, THEN they put you on ignore

You are seriously supporting ps's arguments and style of communication?

Ill happily call some of what Juan bottom posts retarded even though we're on the same side. You don't feel the same way when you see phatscotty off rolling his usual intellectual dishonesty?

i have criticized some of scotty's posts in the past, but you never hear about it for two reasons:

- he usually takes it to PM's or wall discussions, at least with me
- i respectfully disagree with scotty because he respectfully gives his opinions. i disrespectfully disagree with opinions that are given disrespectfully.

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:26 pm**

john9blue wrote:
Lootifer wrote:
john9blue wrote:i thought it was: first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win

but the liberals here have a different method: first they fight you, then you win, then they realize that they've lost and pretend to laugh while running away, THEN they put you on ignore

You are seriously supporting ps's arguments and style of communication?

Ill happily call some of what Juan bottom posts retarded even though we're on the same side. You don't feel the same way when you see phatscotty off rolling his usual intellectual dishonesty?

i have criticized some of scotty's posts in the past, but you never hear about it for two reasons:

- he usually takes it to PM's or wall discussions, at least with me
- i respectfully disagree with scotty because he respectfully gives his opinions. i disrespectfully disagree with opinions that are given disrespectfully.

Phatscotty is NOT respectful in these fora. You are using a highly unusual version of "respectful" that really means something other than that. Perhaps "polite" (though I don't consider his posts polite either) or something along those lines. Definitely not "respectful".

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:28 pm**

Woodruff wrote:
john9blue wrote:
Lootifer wrote:
john9blue wrote:i thought it was: first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win

but the liberals here have a different method: first they fight you, then you win, then they realize that they've lost and pretend to laugh while running away, THEN they put you on ignore

You are seriously supporting ps's arguments and style of communication?

Ill happily call some of what Juan bottom posts retarded even though we're on the same side. You don't feel the same way when you see phatscotty off rolling his usual intellectual dishonesty?

i have criticized some of scotty's posts in the past, but you never hear about it for two reasons:

- he usually takes it to PM's or wall discussions, at least with me
- i respectfully disagree with scotty because he respectfully gives his opinions. i disrespectfully disagree with opinions that are given disrespectfully.

Phatscotty is NOT respectful in these fora. You are using a highly unusual version of "respectful" that really means something other than that. Perhaps "polite" (though I don't consider his posts polite either) or something along those lines. Definitely not "respectful".

every time you criticize my use of the english language, a kitten dies

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:35 pm**

In all seriousness john, I do give Scotty a chance to give his opinions and at first I answer to his opinion specifically. I do that for every poster pretty much. And osmetimes we get some interesting discussions.

But a lot of the times it is his absolute inability to concede in an argument, his constant impression that he has one opinion then 5 pages later he'll say "oh this is what I really think," his use of obnoxious pictures and videos, and worst of all his use of the words "nazi" "fascist" etc. to describe anything he opposes make it hard to do that every time.

Just look at the recent Huma Abeddin thread. You know that is a ridiculous thread.

Posted: **Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:00 am**

Posted: **Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:02 am**

She doesn't look 450 pounds.

Posted: **Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:05 am**

BigBallinStalin wrote:She doesn't look 450 pounds.

It's all below the waist!

Posted: **Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:31 am**

john9blue wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
john9blue wrote:
Lootifer wrote:
john9blue wrote:i thought it was: first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win

but the liberals here have a different method: first they fight you, then you win, then they realize that they've lost and pretend to laugh while running away, THEN they put you on ignore

You are seriously supporting ps's arguments and style of communication?

Ill happily call some of what Juan bottom posts retarded even though we're on the same side. You don't feel the same way when you see phatscotty off rolling his usual intellectual dishonesty?

i have criticized some of scotty's posts in the past, but you never hear about it for two reasons:

- he usually takes it to PM's or wall discussions, at least with me
- i respectfully disagree with scotty because he respectfully gives his opinions. i disrespectfully disagree with opinions that are given disrespectfully.

Phatscotty is NOT respectful in these fora. You are using a highly unusual version of "respectful" that really means something other than that. Perhaps "polite" (though I don't consider his posts polite either) or something along those lines. Definitely not "respectful".

every time you criticize my use of the english language, a kitten dies

Well, at least you addressed the point of the post...

Conquer Club

shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Re: shoulda hadda gun?