Gay Adoption

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Where are you on Gay Adoption?

Poll ended at Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:58 pm

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by john9blue »

BigBallinStalin wrote:Well, let's have the independent weigh in.

What's your position on the gay abolition of Taliban-conceived marriages involving the adoption of three or more gay children?
nowhere in the constitution does it say that gay people CAN'T do that... so basically i'm all for it.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by BigBallinStalin »

john9blue wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Well, let's have the independent weigh in.

What's your position on the gay abolition of Taliban-conceived marriages involving the adoption of three or more gay children?
nowhere in the constitution does it say that gay people CAN'T do that... so basically i'm all for it.
OH! OH! But what about Amendment X, which states:
  • The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

What now, john? What now?



(to be fair, I think there's something in the constitution about marriage and how the federal government is involved with it, but I dunno lol).
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by john9blue »

BigBallinStalin wrote:
john9blue wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Well, let's have the independent weigh in.

What's your position on the gay abolition of Taliban-conceived marriages involving the adoption of three or more gay children?
nowhere in the constitution does it say that gay people CAN'T do that... so basically i'm all for it.
OH! OH! But what about Amendment X, which states:
  • The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

What now, john? What now?
it depends on how gay the state is.

a strongly heterosexual state like colorado has no right to abolish taliban marriages.

new hampshire, on the other hand...
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Army of GOD »

Vermont and New Hampshire are definitely the gayest states. They're 69ing for god's sakes.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by john9blue »

Army of GOD wrote:Vermont and New Hampshire are definitely the gayest states. They're 69ing for god's sakes.
yeah, but the reason i said new hampshire is because vermont is on top and new hampshire is the bottom. therefore NH is gayer because it's vermont's bitch
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 13428
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by saxitoxin »

but Vermont looks like it's enjoying it more

Image

(blacked out the naughty parts so I don't get a ban)
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by BigBallinStalin »

To be serious, in Phatscotty's defense, which so far has been embarrassing to me, the issue of gay marriage and gay adoption should be delegated to the States--according to the Constitution. If anyone would like to argue against my Appeal to the Constitution argument (lightly explained here), then they're free to use the constitution against me, or maybe even use the Declaration of Independence.

If not, they can present some other argument based on whatever grounds.

ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.
User avatar
patrickaa317
Posts: 2269
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:10 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by patrickaa317 »

BigBallinStalin wrote:To be serious, in Phatscotty's defense, which so far has been embarrassing to me, the issue of gay marriage and gay adoption should be delegated to the States--according to the Constitution. If anyone would like to argue against my Appeal to the Constitution argument (lightly explained here), then they're free to use the constitution against me, or maybe even use the Declaration of Independence.

If not, they can present some other argument based on whatever grounds.

ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.

Which is also why I have mentioned that the best thing that could happen for gay marriage would be the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act that was signed in under Clinton; and in turn force the federal government to recognize marriage if the applicable state recognizes said marriage as such.
taking a break from cc, will be back sometime in the future.
User avatar
Lootifer
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Lootifer »

BigBallinStalin wrote: ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.
Darfaq? You used to be cool...
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Phatscotty »

BigBallinStalin wrote:To be serious, in Phatscotty's defense, which so far has been embarrassing to me, the issue of gay marriage and gay adoption should be delegated to the States--according to the Constitution. If anyone would like to argue against my Appeal to the Constitution argument (lightly explained here), then they're free to use the constitution against me, or maybe even use the Declaration of Independence.

If not, they can present some other argument based on whatever grounds.

ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.
yeah, states rights
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Lootifer wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote: ITT, I'll strive to be Constitutionalist.
Darfaq? You used to be cool...
Bring it, Lootaboy.

**It's pronounced "Darfur," not "Darfaq," you simpleton.
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Juan_Bottom »

Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Woodruff »

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:I think the people in charge of giving away the child should have some say in the decision
I agree, as long as they're not being bigoted.
Phatscotty wrote:, and I think the child should have a say too.
I can agree with that.
Phatscotty wrote:Seems fair
As long as they're not being bigoted.
Why would anyone be bigoted against the people giving away the child and the child? Do they have ideas that the adopting parents are bigoted against?
Do you actually not understand the sentence that you wrote?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Juan_Bottom wrote:Image
Oh, but it must... after all Nightstrike is ALL about the constitution!
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Juan_Bottom »

If it's not in the Constitution, then we get to hear STATES RIGHTS!!!!!
User avatar
patrickaa317
Posts: 2269
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:10 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by patrickaa317 »

Juan_Bottom wrote:Image
I don't believe the constitution defines any sins actually. Perhaps Woodruff the constitutional teacher can chime in and help you understand what is in there.
taking a break from cc, will be back sometime in the future.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Phatscotty »

Poll has ended

Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Army of GOD »

can cheeseburgers adopt children?
mrswdk is a ho
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by PLAYER57832 »

patrickaa317 wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:Image
I don't believe the constitution defines any sins actually. Perhaps Woodruff the constitutional teacher can chime in and help you understand what is in there.
I believe you can check under "sarcasm" in your dictionary for the real explanation.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Woodruff »

patrickaa317 wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:Image
I don't believe the constitution defines any sins actually. Perhaps Woodruff the constitutional teacher can chime in and help you understand what is in there.
I suspect that is precisely the point the meme is trying to make...
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Sorry to bust the bubble here, but that pic is almost as intellectually relevant and accurate as the following post: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... d#p3793754
User avatar
patrickaa317
Posts: 2269
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:10 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by patrickaa317 »

BigBallinStalin wrote:Sorry to bust the bubble here, but that pic is almost as intellectually relevant and accurate as the following post: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... d#p3793754
+1
taking a break from cc, will be back sometime in the future.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Phatscotty »

Give it 9 out of 10 in the category of snarkiness
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by Army of GOD »

BigBallinStalin wrote:Sorry to bust the bubble here, but that pic is almost as intellectually relevant and accurate as the following post: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... d#p3793754
what the f*ck are you implying?
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Gay Adoption

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Army of GOD wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Sorry to bust the bubble here, but that pic is almost as intellectually relevant and accurate as the following post: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... d#p3793754
what the f*ck are you implying?
I think cheeseburgers are responsible for the ills of this time, and if we do nothing to cut short this crisis, we will experience a catastrophe far worse than the severest predictions by radical environmentalists. That's all I'm implying.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”