Conquer Club

i like the second, for me the conquest bit ruined the new lands map especially since they are so high- 6 neutral per terit.

hmm i think that i will open pool with these two option.

sam_levi_11 wrote:i like the second, for me the conquest bit ruined the new lands map especially since they are so high- 6 neutral per terit.

if I follow you sam, you're saying you like the conquest play option because conquest play ruined another map?

And thank you Multiplayertim for expressing the same concern that i had about Crete.

And thank you Multiplayertim for expressing the same concern that i had about Crete.

Well i dont se any problem with Crete.
Crete is a part of Crete et Cyrenaica provinces,like name says,and Circle in Cyrenaica present bouth parts,conected with white line.Belive me ,nobody can attack only Crete,because Crete dont have Circle and Army numbers.

Vote please

[BigImg][/BigImg]
why these BigImg not working for signature,these become very iritating

vote please-day 2

vote please -day 3

please vote-day 4

not counting this post, 19 of the last 25 posts in this topic have been by you, qwert. Since I last checked in you've just been bumping. I find that troubling.

by oaktown on Mon May 26, 2008 6:17 pm

not counting this post, 19 of the last 25 posts in this topic have been by you, qwert. Since I last checked in you've just been bumping. I find that troubling.

Why these troubling?I just want to people come and vote,first several days i waiting to get feedback,and these is only way to people see and vote,or maybe you have better idea.

7 agains 7,

almost forget
Please vote day 5

I think that 10 days limit

Qwert - there are a whole bunch of new conquest maps coming online right now. I think people will be more responsive to the classic style of gameplay when this map is likely to debut. I forget which number this was, but the option in which the towns, ships, etc. start neutral is the safer bet.

And regarding the Crete and Cyrenacia issue, my recommendation would be to change the style of line which connects the two. The line you have now is used as an attack line in other contexts, and that could be confusing. Not crippling to gameplay, of course, but potentially confusing. Either don't connect the two at all and let the name "Creta et Cyrenacia" be the giveaway, or use a different style of line to connect them. At least you'll satisfy the crowd.

Oaktown - Hope I'm not crossing a line with this, but I say give Qwert a little more slack. From what I can see, the Foundry's been moving somewhat slowly lately. It is exam season for some of us, after all

the reason i havnt voted is because i really don't know what im voting for!
maybe if you posted it here like u did on the 1st page, you may get more votes?
maybe you could describe the difference more?
1. diference
how this might be better gameplay/more fair
2. difference 2
how this might improve gameplay/make it more fair
3. dif. 3
how this might....


see my point?

Qwert I like the subject matter of your map of course, but personally I really don't like the conquest approach you used for the map. Besides CC has been saturated with conquest style maps lately and the trend seems to indicate that more will be coming out.

I would prefer this to be a classic gameplay map. Something similar to what Guiscard was trying to do.

Keep in mind that this is only my very personal opinion. Good luck with the map.

And regarding the Crete and Cyrenacia issue, my recommendation would be to change the style of line which connects the two. The line you have now is used as an attack line in other contexts, and that could be confusing. Not crippling to gameplay, of course, but potentially confusing. Either don't connect the two at all and let the name "Creta et Cyrenacia" be the giveaway, or use a different style of line to connect them. At least you'll satisfy the crowd.

Ok i can erase white line.

by t-o-m on Thu May 29, 2008 1:21 pm

the reason i havnt voted is because i really don't know what im voting for!
maybe if you posted it here like u did on the 1st page, you may get more votes?
maybe you could describe the difference more?
1. diference
how this might be better gameplay/more fair
2. difference 2
how this might improve gameplay/make it more fair
3. dif. 3
how this might....


see my point?

Map tell you everything,you can decide what is best,ofcourse bouth option its Fair and Balanced that nobody have any advantage in begining,and these is importan.

by Ruben Cassar on Thu May 29, 2008 2:10 pm

Qwert I like the subject matter of your map of course, but personally I really don't like the conquest approach you used for the map. Besides CC has been saturated with conquest style maps lately and the trend seems to indicate that more will be coming out.

I would prefer this to be a classic gameplay map. Something similar to what Guiscard was trying to do.

Keep in mind that this is only my very personal opinion. Good luck with the map.

Well you know me,i want to map be acurate,and because these i not put Country bonuses.
Guiscard create map who is not historical acurate,and then its quit easy to create Countrys.In these map country not exist only provinces.

qwert wrote:Map tell you everything

but we cant see the whole map since you put it in a quote!

but we cant see the whole map since you put it in a quote!

I try with Bigimg and its not working,and also i can not se mine signature to

I will leave these poll for 3 more days

On a separate note...shouldn't you have some consistency with the "v" and "u"?

Either use always v instead of a u or vice versa. Some regions have a v while others have a u. I think I would stick with v.

by Ruben Cassar on Sat May 31, 2008 1:12 am

On a separate note...shouldn't you have some consistency with the "v" and "u"?

Either use always v instead of a u or vice versa. Some regions have a v while others have a u. I think I would stick with v.

Non playabile regions have insted U-V. Playabile have U.

9-9

Hi Qwert,

I haven't had enough time to look properly at the different gameplay options... I'll try and have a proper look at them during the week and get back to you

In the meatime, could you explain what you mean by the 3+3 in Italy on v1, and the 3+3+3 on Crete et Cre-whatever on v2??

by MrBenn on Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:52 am

Hi Qwert,

I haven't had enough time to look properly at the different gameplay options... I'll try and have a proper look at them during the week and get back to you

In the meatime, could you explain what you mean by the 3+3 in Italy on v1, and the 3+3+3 on Crete et Cre-whatever on v2??

well when i put numbers(these is not XML)i take from map with numbers(copy map and paste)and then take numbers,and insted neutral 6 or 9(its quit dificulty to find these numbers)i put 3+3 what mean 6 neutral.

OK. Thanks for clarifying that qwert.

I'll have a better look at the maps later.