Conquer Club

bigtoughralf wrote:

2dimes wrote:What are you yipping about? Is it difficult to change a name? Is there some correlation between people, born male, named Dylan, that decide to become female?

I just figured giving a child a gendered name doesn't set it up for a very gender neutral childhood.

I don't mean gender neutral in a militant way, preventing children from being boys or girls.

I mean not forcing them to identify sexually. Boys and girls should not be considered breeding pairs like men and women.

Some people reproduce when they are teenagers, I have often heard complaining about it forcing them to "grow up too soon."

bigtoughralf wrote:

2dimes wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:Hence countries like Germany, Italy, China, Brazil etc setting the age of consent at 14, I guess.

Do you think one day, you might stop being interested in 14 year olds?

Hey now, I live in the UK to ensure there's always a good wide stretch of sea between me and all those kid-fucking continental types.

Oh, you're not a pedofile yourself, you just like to defend regional laws to protect them.

2dimes wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:

2dimes wrote:What are you yipping about? Is it difficult to change a name? Is there some correlation between people, born male, named Dylan, that decide to become female?

I just figured giving a child a gendered name doesn't set it up for a very gender neutral childhood.

I don't mean gender neutral in a militant way, preventing children from being boys or girls.

I mean not forcing them to identify sexually.

Not gendering children and not sexualising them are two very different things. Now I see why your thoughts keep going back to pedophilia.

I'm not sure many societies have widespread sexualisation of children tbf. Except maybe those parts of the US that have child beauty pageants, and of course the French.

Oh, you're not a pedofile yourself, you just like to defend regional laws to protect them.

I wasn't defending them.

In any case, you can defend the legal right to do something without doing it yourself. I support saxitoxin's right to engage in cock and ball torture as he pleases but it's not something I'd ever want to do myself.

Well, pretty much everyone else here seems to be in favour of higher age of consent.

A few of us believe, people should at very least be encouraged to wait until they are into their twenties. I understand that in many cases it is unlikely.

2dimes wrote:A few of us believe, people should at very least be encouraged to wait until they are into their twenties.

The best contraception is abstinence. Inshallah they shall remain virgins until the day of their marriage. Cut off their foreskins to stop them masturbating.

Most U S males have their foreskins removed at birth. It doesn't stop them wanking, it just drives the sales of lotions.

jonesthecurl wrote:Most U S males have their foreskins removed at birth. It doesn't stop them wanking, it just drives the sales of lotions.

It’s a conspiracy by Johnson and Johnson!

ACLU Has Priorities Straight?

https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/1669705153316880385

So the ACLU thinks….

1) The State has a DUTY to pay for “Gender Affirming Care” to convicted Criminals.
-> Idiotic. Yes… basic health care nothing more.
-> Possibly it’d be ok for the State to allow a prisoner to pay for their own surgery… but to demand that I the Taxpayer pay is idiotic.

2) The ACLU is also upset we didn’t pay for “GAC” on a Death Row inmate!
-> Like if the dude is gonna be killed imminently they why waste the time/money for surgery?

The ACLU should be upset it took 30 years for the this guy to his sentence acted upon.
The time is the only problem.

Either…
1) He was guilty and they should move his appeals along and act on the sentence within a couple years.
-OR-
2) There were legit questions about his guilt and they should’ve changed the sentence.

I honestly don’t care enough to research…I’m gonna assume it’s #1.

The main thing I KNOW is the State was correct in deny Gender Surgery.

jonesthecurl wrote:Most U S males have their foreskins removed at birth. It doesn't stop them wanking, it just drives the sales of lotions.

Addicts will go to great lengths to get their fix. I never said Male Genital Mutilation was a catch-all solution.