Conquer Club

How do you know you were targeted?

If you really were all that smart, you should state whom you were targeted by, clever trousers

I roleblocked pika with my bussy. He claims to have roleblocked lovo and succeeded. Lovo also claims to have been blocked and there was no NK.

Fircoal did you learn anything?

Pikanchion wrote:Well I did indeed target lord voldemort with my roleblock, so... Your bussy got the wrong target a second time?

Maybe I don't have much faith in its operation to be honest . However you learnt about someone else yes? I take it you know who that person ?

The suspense is killing me!

I did learn about somebody, I am not absolutely sure I know who they are, but I think I do.

We are looking for the godfather ga7 could usurp remember too.. Ragian are you that godfather?

Lol. No.

Just a note: Due to a part of my role I have not revealed I find it extreeemely unlikely that me and volde are of different alignments.

I have to say, pika's response doesn't leave me very satisfied. Dakky's the only other one who had such a bland role. It just doesn't seem to fit the setup. Not giving his name either doesn't help.

Vote Pika

I have a bland role

Samlen wrote:Just a note: Due to a part of my role I have not revealed I find it extreeemely unlikely that me and volde are of different alignments.

I have to say, pika's response doesn't leave me very satisfied. Dakky's the only other one who had such a bland role. It just doesn't seem to fit the setup. Not giving his name either doesn't help.

Vote Pika

He has successfully roleblocked two nights in a row it seems though more than I can say for my failing night action Also as he was bussy'd last night so if he was lying it would be easy for someone to come out and share it

Ok we assume he does have a bland role. Why is he being so reluctant in sharing his name? Is it because he's afraid we'll lynch him over it, because that's the only reason i'd see to not come out with his rolename.

+My assumption before ragian said his role was bland too was that pika was telling the partial truth; that he was a roleblocker + something else he didn't want us to know about.

Is that because you have only told us part of your role? It seems sort of hypocritical, mate.

I figured pika was hiding the second part completely. I at least admitted I have a second part. If you need that part to trust me, then say so. Otherwise, I see no point in revealing it yet.

I don't have a second part, this can be verified by whoever had dinner with me last night if they wished to do so (although failing to dispute this claim should be proof enough).

Pika. Who did you have dinner with. Or what was discussed etc.

You learned about somebody. Elaborate. We are approaching end game it's time to get some answers to put the puzzle together

Well if the person who I had dinner with wishes to reveal themselves to the town at large I could confirm their role, otherwise I see little reason to do so. Did nobody else learn anything?

I guess I will say this actually: The person I had dinner with is certainly not a killing role.

Ragian wrote:If you really were all that smart, you should state whom you were targeted by, clever trousers

you dare sass ME?

Maybe what happened is that I am super clever and knew the doctor would be super clever, clever Skoff claimed doctor to pull the night kill and the clever doctor saw what I was up to and the clever sausage protected me to foil the probably now very disgruntled scummies. Such plan, much majesticness!

Samlen wrote:Ok we assume he does have a bland role. Why is he being so reluctant in sharing his name? Is it because he's afraid we'll lynch him over it, because that's the only reason i'd see to not come out with his rolename.

Pika has proven useful on some parts, but I will say this; the last time Pika delayed sharing his name after I continually pressed him for it I caught him as scum

Anyway since I am positive the lack of a nightkill was from a doc save and not a roleblock I'm not going to consider anyone 'proven' either way in regards to that.

This is getting nowhere.

@Pika, why are you withholding your name?
@person-who-had-dinner-with-pika, why won't you fess up to that?

Mass claim anyone?

vote pika

this is getting no where...L-2. feel free to claim.

Roels and thoughts..

lovo - monopoy guy. dreaming god.
samlen - lovo enabler. no name claim
nagerous - bus driver? or dinner host? no name claim -> firc/ga7 N!, pikan/?? N2
pika - claims roleblock. no name.
fircoal - has some kind of investigative role that allowed him to clear dj. (dj flipped town)no name claim
skoffin - appears to be just voting anyone and everything (PR??)
raigon - hasnt claimed anything

Im supoer skeptical of pika...ga7 pleaded us to look at him before the lynch
then day 3 he leads with someone was likely blocked last night

Pikanchion wrote:I may or may not have been invited to dinner, and I was not told that my action failed, but I was told that either myself or my potential fellow diner would be the target of a roleblock... So... Before it is revealed which of us were the roleblocked diner I think it may be important to ask: was anybody else roleblocked last night?

Then I say I was blocked

then he says

Pikanchion wrote:Well I did indeed target lord voldemort with my roleblock, so... Your bussy got the wrong target a second time?

Im an 100% on the pika is scum train

2 blokers dont make heaps of sense to begin with.

@nag who was the other diner?

cause that could be scum number 2 as well?

I don't get your issue with Pika in the stuff you quoted...? He says his action didn't fail and you prove him right...