Moderator: Community Team

Samlem just claimed trainer too.Samlen wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:I Am your Mod. Live with it!
Fine, Can I at least Role-Claim?
Of course you can. However, all roles will face quick and ignoble death (not Mod-Kill, but “natural” causes) if they claim. So claim away, I double-dare you.
![]()
.
.
.
2. Due to the game mechanics and the WCs, Role-claiming is going to be suicidal for almost all the players in almost every situation. Anyone role-claiming is either lying or trying to lose. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!![]()
DBased on these, plus the whole whatever trainer survives wins, I'd agree with the idea that, at the very least, the town is not unified. The contextual evidence that we've been given suggests that the town is filled with 'survivor' like town roles, possibly in control of other 'pokemon' to form multiple town-ish groups. Of course, it wouldn't be Mafia without a Mafia-like group, so I would concur with the idea that Team Rocket is likely within this game, probably as a larger threat than each of the other individual trainers. Mandy mentioned Pokemon battles, so it's quite possible that each Pokemon has it's strengths/weaknesses(based on their type like water/fire/etc). That means that if a Pokemon claims, they will likely be targeted by other pokemon they are weak to. And if a Trainer claims, then the other trainers will go after them. Sooo yeah suicidal claiming indeed. So as far as the 'town' goes, we can really only agree to try and take out Team Rocket first, since they are likely the greatest threat. After that? Probably a chaotic mess of everyone trying to get rid of all the opposing trainers/pokemon. But I guess we'll cross that bridge when we get there....Minister Masket wrote:[Bugcatcher Kwanton wants to battle!]
Where was Pokemon roles mentioned? I assumed it would all be trainers. Then again my memory of the Indigo series is very fuzzy. I know there've been loads of trainers introduced over the years but perhaps there weren't that many way back then.
I explained how I drew those conclusions from the contextual evidence that the mod gave everyone, meaning anyone should have been able to draw this conclusion, but ok.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Samlem just claimed trainer too.Samlen wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:I Am your Mod. Live with it!
Fine, Can I at least Role-Claim?
Of course you can. However, all roles will face quick and ignoble death (not Mod-Kill, but “natural” causes) if they claim. So claim away, I double-dare you.
![]()
.
.
.
2. Due to the game mechanics and the WCs, Role-claiming is going to be suicidal for almost all the players in almost every situation. Anyone role-claiming is either lying or trying to lose. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!![]()
DBased on these, plus the whole whatever trainer survives wins, I'd agree with the idea that, at the very least, the town is not unified. The contextual evidence that we've been given suggests that the town is filled with 'survivor' like town roles, possibly in control of other 'pokemon' to form multiple town-ish groups. Of course, it wouldn't be Mafia without a Mafia-like group, so I would concur with the idea that Team Rocket is likely within this game, probably as a larger threat than each of the other individual trainers. Mandy mentioned Pokemon battles, so it's quite possible that each Pokemon has it's strengths/weaknesses(based on their type like water/fire/etc). That means that if a Pokemon claims, they will likely be targeted by other pokemon they are weak to. And if a Trainer claims, then the other trainers will go after them. Sooo yeah suicidal claiming indeed. So as far as the 'town' goes, we can really only agree to try and take out Team Rocket first, since they are likely the greatest threat. After that? Probably a chaotic mess of everyone trying to get rid of all the opposing trainers/pokemon. But I guess we'll cross that bridge when we get there....Minister Masket wrote:[Bugcatcher Kwanton wants to battle!]
Where was Pokemon roles mentioned? I assumed it would all be trainers. Then again my memory of the Indigo series is very fuzzy. I know there've been loads of trainers introduced over the years but perhaps there weren't that many way back then.
I suggest we leave him and Masket to it.
@Fircoal and Skoffin. It looks strongly like Nark went looking for an easy target. He has already stated that he thinks I am inexperienced. Its not what he wrote, its why he chose to attack me. Looks scummmy. Even his case against Masket includes comments about Maskets joke. He appears to have confused us together.
@Fircoal. If you ever have a feeling that Hotshot isnt contributing, dont think just lynch. It is important that you guys know this. Hence my post to draw attention to it.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Are you claiming trainer?Minister Masket wrote:Where was Pokemon roles mentioned? I assumed it would all be trainers. Then again my memory of the Indigo series is very fuzzy. I know there've been loads of trainers introduced over the years but perhaps there weren't that many way back then.
This.Anarkistsdream wrote: As for Dakky and Tim, it seems that it is common for them to both be.... a bit overboard?
And this.Anarkistsdream wrote:So you are a trainer? Well golly gee. Let's put a big ol' target on you... Or maybe not. Maybe we are all trainers. But what you just said guarantees you are 1) lying to get info or 2) admiting your role... I don't like either choice.
Make me.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:@Rage. Good, so learn from it.

As others have since posted, Pokemon is full of factions with Team Rocket from Indigo League being the most well known. I don't think it's necessary suspect to point out who could be the (to me) most obvious baddies of the game.BuJaber wrote:Skittles stated that "team rocket and whoever leads them" are the obvious baddies. That's an assumption about factions.Skoffin wrote: I'm not sure I understand your point about Skittles; which part of his comment was an assumption about factions? Could you clarify?
As for Serb, apparently he was just a rage filled character back in the day. Now if only Tonka truck were here, now that was some rage XD
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
I agree, but I won't let him not reply to my question just because he's behaved similarly in the past.BuJaber wrote:Ragian: mitch jumping on a vote is rather typical.. if he agrees with the reasoning he votes without posting a long explanation. So questioning such a vote on day 1 is not gonna get us anywhere (I think).

No opinions formed because I've still to read through the D1 posts, thoughts and comments will follow once I have.Ragian wrote:@legionnare, no opinions formed yet? It's difficult for us - who haven't played with you either - to form an opinion of you if you don't post your thoughts and comments.
another point against you in my book, you dont think input in other cases weather saying its good or bad is needed, basically this sounds like you wanna almsot force us to lynch your case without getting talk about other cases.Anarkistsdream wrote:
I have made a case... It is my best lead. What good does talking about these other cases do me? None, because that does not help my case.
you really want his attention is there a reason why?Anarkistsdream wrote:
Doom... You missed my first comment toward you, so, let me just say, "Hi, buddy! Long time no see!"
Except I already unvoted him.... Way to skim, dude.TimWoodbury wrote:another point against you in my book, you dont think input in other cases weather saying its good or bad is needed, basically this sounds like you wanna almsot force us to lynch your case without getting talk about other cases.Anarkistsdream wrote:
I have made a case... It is my best lead. What good does talking about these other cases do me? None, because that does not help my case.
Because he was someone that used to get picked on a LOT, and then I found out he was really a solid guy who I liked discussing things with.... Remember, a lot of us here used to play a LONG time ago. This game is meant to be fun. If I can't reminisce with old players, what is the point?TimWoodbury wrote:you really want his attention is there a reason why?Anarkistsdream wrote:
Doom... You missed my first comment toward you, so, let me just say, "Hi, buddy! Long time no see!"
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
TimWoodbury wrote:im not shure how i feel about both anakrk AND minster both more or less soft claiming trainers either 1 is role fishing hopeing to get a kill or maybe they are both looking for an ally?? not tottaly sure as to what they got going on they both look off to me right now
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
had 4 pages to read and i saw something that in my eyes was a soft claim trainer. maybe it was you responding and asking a question maybe it wasnt im not shure yet.Anarkistsdream wrote:TimWoodbury wrote:im not shure how i feel about both anakrk AND minster both more or less soft claiming trainers either 1 is role fishing hopeing to get a kill or maybe they are both looking for an ally?? not tottaly sure as to what they got going on they both look off to me right now
Show me where I soft claimed anything... Again, you are skimming and attributing things to the wrong people...
Anarkistsdream wrote:So you are a trainer? Well golly gee. Let's put a big ol' target on you... Or maybe not. Maybe we are all trainers. But what you just said guarantees you are 1) lying to get info or 2) admiting your role... I don't like either choice.
madmitch wrote:As to my vote,Narks point made sense to me at that time , I will change it if I need to , but for now I like it where it is at. I t gets harder and harder to pick out scum because of all the reposting and Skoffin writing all his posts in red don't make it any easier on the eyes, what's up with that ? the nines were a mistake or were they?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Fircoal wrote:
Who are you refering to? Masket? When I said joke I was refering to Wing not Masket. As for Masket I think he screwed up. I can see how one can think he was trying to get more role information though. While that would be somewhat suspicious I still feel like it was a screw up more than anything.
What?! I have never ever done this in any mafia game and I resent the accusation. Nor have I ever been handed roles geared up specifically to sow confusion in the game. These are lies and slander sir and I won't stand for it.DoomYoshi wrote: Minister Masket is probably trying to cause confusion. I'm tempted to vote but waiting to see how this develops a bit.
@ dakky: I misworded it. I meant case, not vote.
Cheers for the support. I also counter-agree on Team Rocket being trainers.Metsfanmax wrote:@Tal Agree with Samlen, Team Rocket were trainers. Regardless of their weirdness in the TV show, in the games Team Rocket actually had Pokemon and battled you with them.
I don't get at all how many people are responding to MM. There's just zero evidence to suggest that it is a scum tell. It's pretty weird that people are concluding anything alignment-indicative about it, this early in the game.

Nark's point made sense at the time. Nark backs off his own point, and mitch, without any further thought of his own, sticks with it, "because". Then complains that it's difficult to find scum because of "reposting" and Skoffin (who's a girl, btw) writing in red. And then decides to be intentionally vague, for what good reason? Every bit of this sounds scummy to me. "oh, it's so hard to find scum, and red is so difficult to read, and it's easier to just vote based on what someone else used to think, and I'm making mistakes, OR AM I?madmitch wrote:As to my vote,Narks point made sense to me at that time , I will change it if I need to , but for now I like it where it is at. I t gets harder and harder to pick out scum because of all the reposting and Skoffin writing all his posts in red don't make it any easier on the eyes, what's up with that ? the nines were a mistake or were they?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE