Conquer Club

Gillipig wrote:t's as simple as this: The more votes the more reliable result! And the 60/40 advantage owen had before was due to the quick voting of his clanmates/friends/"general complainers". I think natty fits all of those !

Sorry for your little butt.

Army of GOD wrote:If this thread was represented by an image, it would just be natty standing in the corner of a room yelling and trying to make fun of people that walk by.

And AoG would be the guy who comes over, rings the doorbell and runs away giggling like a little girl.

natty_dread wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:If this thread was represented by an image, it would just be natty standing in the corner of a room yelling and trying to make fun of people that walk by.

And AoG would be the guy who comes over, rings the doorbell and runs away giggling like a little girl.

You two are killing me...

Army of GOD wrote:If this thread was represented by an image, it would just be natty standing in the corner of a room yelling and trying to make fun of people that walk by.

I was just going to say the exact same thing !

natty_dread wrote:

Gillipig wrote:t's as simple as this: The more votes the more reliable result! And the 60/40 advantage owen had before was due to the quick voting of his clanmates/friends/"general complainers". I think natty fits all of those !

Sorry for your little butt.

lol ?

It must be sore, is all.

ljex wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:Fellas, we're missing the bigger picture here. That is, the current team of moderators is probably the worst team that has ever been assembled in the history of Conquer Club (not counting AKA). The focus is clearly on quantity, not quality. Shame on the mods who are actually decent.

Now i know this post is from days ago, and i havent even made it past this point in the thread to know if someone responded to this yet but i feel i have to.

Ok joshy, coming from a former moderator who left due to a C&A report i dont think you have the right to talk about the current group. Also given your history with eddie2 in whatever clan it was you clearly dont have the ability to offer an objective viewpoint on just about any issue. Its very telling that your still harbor resentment for all of these past events. I think the mods do the best in a tough environment, and lets be honest only about 5 of them are involved in decision making for forum punishments so you as a former moderator should both know that and not act like things are different.

definite +1 there.

natty_dread wrote:It must be sore, is all.

Careful bro, I got warned for trolling for calling someone butthurt. True story, bro.

natty_dread wrote:It must be sore, is all.

I think natty needs a nap ! He's probably been online for a week straight now, and I'm guessing that's why his posts are getting less and less sensible (not that there's ever been much sense in them !). Crack has kept him awake this long but the drop off in quality in his posts says it all!

Gillipig wrote:

natty_dread wrote:It must be sore, is all.

I think natty needs a nap ! He's probably been online for a week straight now, and I'm guessing that's why his posts are getting less and less sensible (not that there's ever been much sense in them !). Crack has kept him awake this long but the drop off in quality in his posts says it all!

You should get some cream for that.

I think this is what you call a broken record

Leehar wrote:I think this is what you call a broken record

No, the "broken record" is what you call Team CC members whenever you try to raise serious and valid questions about site policies.

natty_dread wrote:

Leehar wrote:I think this is what you call a broken record

No, the "broken record" is what you call Team CC members whenever you try to raise serious and valid questions about site policies.

Or the Bandits trying to defend another owen ban? again..

natty_dread wrote:

Leehar wrote:I think this is what you call a broken record

No, the "broken record" is what you call Team CC members whenever you try to raise serious and valid questions about site policies.

Like metsfanmax?

I think natty sounds like a 7th yr Pol. Sci. shreeker from Malcester college (scuse my spelling, not to good at it you Know)

thegreekdog wrote:Like metsfanmax?

What about metsfanmax?

ws1 wrote:I think natty sounds like a 7th yr Pol. Sci. shreeker from Malcester college (scuse my spelling, not to good at it you Know)

Who are you and when have I peed in your breakfast cereal?

natty_dread wrote:What about metsfanmax?

He provided a pretty good and lengthy explanation pretty early in this thread. It was ignored, although I believe someone chose a sentence from it to respond to.

natty, don't ever become a lawyer, for the sake of your clients.

Army of GOD wrote:natty, don't ever become a lawyer, for the sake of your clients.

AoG, don't ever try anal beads. It'll seem fun at first, but if you fart at the wrong time, there'll be shitty beads all over your bedroom walls.

thegreekdog wrote:He provided a pretty good and lengthy explanation pretty early in this thread. It was ignored, although I believe someone chose a sentence from it to respond to.

Oh? I don't remember. Can you post bullet points of the most important parts?

natty_dread wrote:Oh? I don't remember. Can you post bullet points of the most important parts?

I suppose I could, but I won't. It's more entertaining (for me).

The Passion of Owenshooter: To be annoying for sole purpose of being annoying. Seems to be the passion of many members of the BPIs. Not to mention the audacity to call himself "The Black Jesus".

I say: Ban him for life.

Lx

Over/Under this thread reaching 50 pages before owen's return.

lol, very amusing.


-tig

119 votes so far,

52 yes (44%)
67 no (56%)


i think this would be a really good time to run multi checks on ALL the voters

see how many of the 52 that voted YES have the same isp
and how many of the 67 that voted NO have the same isp

and sitters, lol.. don't forget about the people voting their sitter accounts,
once again, the same isp's will reveal much...
and new accounts, look for all new accounts that have voted... just to amp up the #'s

ahhh yes, a most opportune time for all kinds of shenanigans to be revealed by the hunters... lol
but do it quickly, the slipperiest of the bastards will disappear faster than you can say multi mullie!

There are 29 Bandits. I don't know 75% of them or more. The same goes for the % that post in the Bandits forum. I'm guessing that they have no idea what is happening with Owen. A good guess I think. The forum posters know Owen well and those that don't like him are not going to be shy about voting against him regardless of the merits in this case. He's pissed off a lot of people. If you take that in to account then the vote total should absolutely be against him. What is remarkable is how many are supporting him or rather are against this action against him. Claiming he got votes because of his clan mates is ridiculous. Hell, I've been annoyed at some of his posts like I have been with jeffjeff and many others. I think the the vote totals so far reflect that this has been heavy handed and dogmatic and that there is no reasonable explanation for it to have been so. If this is anything it is a call to reason. Did his posts really upset so many people that he had to receive a punishment? Taking away his private messaging was necessary? This is a stupid gaming forum, seriously, he wasn't posting porn, he wasn't posting hate like I see in the political forums. He was busting balls. Why this happened is not because Owen has been an annoying ass before, it is because you goofballs take this shit too seriously and wanted somebody to respect your authority. Sorry guys but that is the same as the meme about winning the Special Olympics.
Nothing is going to change because you can't admit you were wrong or that this isn't a bunch of silly crap or a waste of time. CC is a bunch of silly crap and a waste of time, that's why we participate in it. The real world is even worse so that's why we waste our time here, to escape.

2 of our members don't speak English...

Under 50 pages. Easy.

Uncle Death wrote: He's pissed off a lot of people. If you take that in to account then the vote total should absolutely be against him. What is remarkable is how many are supporting him or rather are against this action against him. Claiming he got votes because of his clan mates is ridiculous. Hell, I've been annoyed at some of his posts like I have been with jeffjeff and many others. I think the the vote totals so far reflect that this has been heavy handed and dogmatic and that there is no reasonable explanation for it to have been so. Did his posts really upset so many people that he had to receive a punishment?

His posts upset 69 people? Or is that maybe 12~ Ent. mods and their multi's?