Conquer Club

saxitoxin wrote:
[i]It's actually seventeen to be able to get away with it. Also, you should be aware that you told an eleven year-old to have sexual encounters.

Again, incorrect and potentially libelious.

Oh? PROVE the individual wasn't eleven. What they say is certainly in no way proof.

Woodruff - thank you for not flooding my wall with aggressive comments anymore. I know, as an older gentleman, you were raised to have a higher sense of decorum and I appreciate you exercising it here.

In regard to your question: what "individual" are you talking about? The lies keep spewing out so fast it's hard to keep up with the latest fantasy. (Amusing, though, because a review of the threads is all that's necessary to show they are lies. I suppose the liars in these cases must think the mods will just side with whomever screams the loudest without doing research?)

I think, though, you may have just ambled into this thread and latched onto one specific scrap and decided to run with it, so - to clarify - I only had provoked, salacious interaction with one person, the person was over 18 which I confirmed to my satisfaction and can be double-confirmed by any mod by review of the individual's payment processing method and, all that aside and most importantly, it clearly and obviously met the legal definition of hyperbole.

This final point is most salient because it gets to the crux of a new level in the rude, bullying on these forums: namely, accusations of disgusting crimes of turpitude if any of the bullies disagrees with you. This is a long, dark spiral we're about to fall down and I hope the mods intervene before it's too late. I'm sorry you, as an older gentleman, fell in with this crowd.

We need enforcement of basic decency and we need it now. Ban Strife.

This is my last post as I await the jurisprudence of the moderators in their decision about whether to or to not ban Strife.

Warmest Regards,
- 35523-89-8

saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff - thank you for not flooding my wall with aggressive comments anymore.

I've never "flooded your wall" with anything, so please stop with your lies and bullshit.

saxitoxin wrote:In regard to your question: what "individual" are you talking about?

The individual that you claim is in their 30s. You have no way of actually knowing that is accurate.

saxitoxin wrote:The lies keep spewing out so fast it's hard to keep up with the latest fantasy. (Amusing, though, because a review of the threads is all that's necessary to show they are lies. I suppose the liars in these cases must think the mods will just side with whomever screams the loudest without doing research?)

No, we leave that tactic to you.

saxitoxin wrote:I think, though, you may have just ambled into this thread and latched onto one specific scrap and decided to run with it, so - to clarify - I only had provoked, salacious interaction with one person, the person was over 18 which I confirmed to my satisfaction and can be double-confirmed by any mod by review of the individual's payment processing method and, all that aside and most importantly, it clearly and obviously met the legal definition of hyperbole.

Your "confirming to your satisfaction" is thoroughly useless, as well as is any "review of the individual's payment processing method" unless you think a parent can't buy their child a membership online using the parent's credit card.

saxitoxin wrote:This final point is most salient because it gets to the crux of a new level in the rude, bullying on these forums: namely, accusations of disgusting crimes of turpitude if any of the bullies disagrees with you.

Yes, it is unfortunate that you've done this. It's nice to see that you're repentant though.

saxitoxin wrote:This is a long, dark spiral we're about to fall down and I hope the mods intervene before it's too late. I'm sorry you, as an older gentleman, fell in with this crowd.

No, I've definitely not fallen in with you.

saxitoxin wrote:We need enforcement of basic decency and we need it now. Ban Strife.

He's done nothing to deserve sanction.

saxitoxin wrote:This is my last post as I await the jurisprudence of the moderators in their decision about whether to or to not ban Strife.

Won't happen. And I'm betting you're lying.

saxitoxin wrote:Warmest Regards

I don't believe that for a moment.

Woodruff - didn't have time to read your entire speech but it looks like you put a lot of work into it so if you'd like to PM me a few bullet-points I'll give it the once over.

Thanks,
- 35523-89-8

saxitoxin wrote:2009-07-08 19:48:02 - lanyards: You f*ck off
2009-07-08 19:48:05 - lanyards: Bitch
2009-07-08 19:48:24 - saxitoxin: Yellow, that is not appropriate language for the game chat.
2009-07-08 19:48:52 - saxitoxin: Please refer to the Community Guidelines if you need guidance about acceptable language. viewtopic.php?t=7785
2009-07-08 19:48:58 - lanyards: Your idiotic knowledge of the game is not appropriate.
2009-07-08 19:49:08 - lanyards: f*ck you green
2009-07-08 19:49:13 - lanyards: Your a fucking cook
2009-07-08 19:49:42 - saxitoxin: Yellow, "your" is a conjunction and should be spelled "you're." Thanks.
2009-07-08 19:50:57 - lanyards: About my language, f*ck YOU
2009-07-08 19:53:09 - saxitoxin: Yellow, I regret you have made the choice to continue to violate the community guidelines through your choice of language in the game chat.
2009-07-08 19:53:37 - lanyards: viewforum.php?f=5
2009-07-08 19:53:41 - lanyards: RIGHT HERE BITCH
2009-07-08 19:53:44 - lanyards: REPORT
2009-07-08 19:53:47 - lanyards: NEW THREAD
2009-07-08 19:53:50 - lanyards: FILL OUTTHE FORm
2009-07-08 19:53:53 - lanyards: POST

Alright, troll. You win. That's some funny shit.

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:
The only intents I carry are those of safety and too keep the, at least, not fully, sullied name of our site as a community. I guess that doesn't concern you.

Thanks!

Strife - I am concerned about the foul language you and your compatriots (see lanyards, above) use around minors. I am concerned about the disruption to our community that is made when people file frivolous and fictitious abuse reports such as you have done. I am concerned about the chilling effect on free discussion in our community that occurs when members starting threatening - using an, admittedly, very shaky grasp of the law - litigation and prosecution over comments made in the forums, as you have done, when you disagree with comments in an effort to silence the commenter.

I hope this community can grow with you but I understand sometimes excision of a bad seed is necessary to facilitate growth.

Your implicit accusations of pedophilia are so beyond the pale in sheer outrage that I trust in the absolute jurisprudence of the moderators to address this situation swiftly and efficiently.

I hope you feel better.

Thanks.

First, colton's account says he is 11. I went by that.

Language is only truly as foul as the one who beholds it.

I never, absolutely, said you were a pedophile. I simply told you to watch out because what if they were underage. You would become a registered sex offender(assuming you aren't already), that makes it a possibility.

My abuse report was made with good reason. Very good. You could be sexually soliciting minors in which, lack would be held partially responsible for not preventing, as such he now has the power and knowledge of what you can and may have already done.

Also, you continue to be a troll.

Sincerely,
Strife.

Timminz, thanks.

Also, Timminz, I note your age in your profile says you are "5" - you are probably aware that, if that is true, by posting on these boards someone is in violation of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (USC s1301). I hope Strife and his little puppy Woodruff go running off, stubby little arms flailing in the air, to report this to the FTC as quickly as possible. If not, I will.

Thanks, Timminz!

saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff - didn't have time to read your entire speech but it looks like you put a lot of work into it so if you'd like to PM me a few bullet-points I'll give it the once over.

See, I knew you were lying. Yet again. Too bad you have to run and hide like this, though. How embarrassing for you.

Tell me more.

saxitoxin wrote:Timminz, thanks.
Also, Timminz, I note your age in your profile says you are "5" - you are probably aware that, if that is true, by posting on these boards someone is in violation of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (USC s1301). I hope Strife and his little puppy Woodruff go running off, stubby little arms flailing in the air, to report this to the FTC as quickly as possible. If not, I will.

Once again, you are lying because you will do no such thing. Stop lying.

You could be sexually soliciting minors in which, lack would be held partially responsible for not preventing, as such he now has the power and knowledge of what you can and may have already done.

You have so little idea about what you're talking about it's just laughingly bandwidth-consuming.

You made an implicit accusation on the basis of a stated hyperbolic statement and which, even that, you now note you were in error on, which, in any court of law, would result in a quick and easy finding of statutory libel damages in my favor ... the only thing that's saved you is that userid's can't be defamed.

But don't worry, punk'in, I'll find a way around it. You started destroying this community by making legal threats. I intend to save it through the same tactic.

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:Timminz, thanks.
Also, Timminz, I note your age in your profile says you are "5" - you are probably aware that, if that is true, by posting on these boards someone is in violation of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (USC s1301). I hope Strife and his little puppy Woodruff go running off, stubby little arms flailing in the air, to report this to the FTC as quickly as possible. If not, I will.

Once again, you are lying because you will do no such thing. Stop lying.

Oh Woodruff, you silly old woman. I have no desire to continue engaging the idiocy and lunatic rantings of a mere school marm.

just a hunch but ill bet $25 that colton24 and saxitoxin turn out to be multis. they both stink of douchebaggery.

saxitoxin wrote:You could be sexually soliciting minors in which, lack would be held partially responsible for not preventing, as such he now has the power and knowledge of what you can and may have already done.

You have so little idea about what you're talking about it's just laughingly bandwidth-consuming.

You made an implicit accusation on the basis of a stated hyperbolic statement and which, even that, you now note you were in error on, which, in any court of law, would result in a quick and easy finding of statutory libel damages in my favor ... the only thing that's saved you is that userid's can't be defamed.

But don't worry, punk'in, I'll find a way around it. You started destroying this community by making legal threats. I intend to save it through the same tactic.

Ugh, you have so little knowledge about anything I'm going to split my side laughing.

I made a statement, saying that you may have sexually solicited a minor, in which you responded by saying you got their age first, and knew they weren't a minor. Then, you actually sexually assaulted them, but I failed to bring that up because I don't really care. I never said I was in error. You're making more bullshit up. I don't think you even know what you say half the time. It's really quite amusing.

But don't worry, pusk'in, I'll find away through it. I can endure you trying to take over our forums by trying to eliminate our use of language, making legal threats. I'll just have to defend us with a better skill. Since you like libel's so much, for the record: I never made a legal threat. I informed you that you may be committing a federal crime. You're welcome.

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:Timminz, thanks.
Also, Timminz, I note your age in your profile says you are "5" - you are probably aware that, if that is true, by posting on these boards someone is in violation of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (USC s1301). I hope Strife and his little puppy Woodruff go running off, stubby little arms flailing in the air, to report this to the FTC as quickly as possible. If not, I will.

Once again, you are lying because you will do no such thing. Stop lying.

Oh Woodruff, you silly old woman. I have no desire to continue engaging the idiocy and lunatic rantings of a mere school marm.

Yes, running and hiding does seem to be your only real effective means of discussing anything. We certainly can see nothing you've said has been effective in the least.

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:Timminz, thanks.
Also, Timminz, I note your age in your profile says you are "5" - you are probably aware that, if that is true, by posting on these boards someone is in violation of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (USC s1301). I hope Strife and his little puppy Woodruff go running off, stubby little arms flailing in the air, to report this to the FTC as quickly as possible. If not, I will.

Once again, you are lying because you will do no such thing. Stop lying.

Oh Woodruff, you silly old woman. I have no desire to continue engaging the idiocy and lunatic rantings of a mere school marm.

Yes, running and hiding does seem to be your only real effective means of discussing anything. We certainly can see nothing you've said has been effective in the least.

It must be how the troll feeds.

Strife - you've been reported for flaming in the Reports forum.

saxitoxin wrote:Strife - you've been reported for flaming in the Reports forum.

When did I flame you?

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:Strife - you've been reported for flaming in the Reports forum.

When did I flame you?

You didn't. Just more lies on his part.

Woodruff wrote:

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:Strife - you've been reported for flaming in the Reports forum.

When did I flame you?

You didn't. Just more lies on his part.

It seems, now that they have been proven wrong beyond any reasonable doubt, this would be the last resort. Bye bye saxi.

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:Strife - you've been reported for flaming in the Reports forum.

When did I flame you?

you said - "It must be how the troll feeds."

Accusing someone of trolling is a flame. Have fun!

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:Strife - you've been reported for flaming in the Reports forum.

When did I flame you?

you said - "It must be how the troll feeds."

Accusing someone of trolling is a flame. Have fun!

No it's not actually, because you are a troll. And I personally admit to feeding you, I took your bait, but I beat the troll with it's own club. I will have fun though, thanks.

although i dont agree with is actions...its funny that of the few games ove looked at people have got angry at him for being a f*cking cook...or other low ranks..
although what he is doing is still not on i reckon..
be interesting to see what a mod says

lord voldemort wrote:although i dont agree with is actions...its funny that of the few games ove looked at people have got angry at him for being a f*cking cook...or other low ranks..
although what he is doing is still not on i reckon..
be interesting to see what a mod says

I believe clap'ems already disagrees.

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:
The only intents I carry are those of safety and too keep the, at least, not fully, sullied name of our site as a community. I guess that doesn't concern you.

Thanks!

Strife - I am concerned about the foul language you and your compatriots (see lanyards, above) use around minors. I am concerned about the disruption to our community that is made when people file frivolous and fictitious abuse reports such as you have done. I am concerned about the chilling effect on free discussion in our community that occurs when members starting threatening - using an, admittedly, very shaky grasp of the law - litigation and prosecution over comments made in the forums, as you have done, when you disagree with comments in an effort to silence the commenter.

I hope this community can grow with you but I understand sometimes excision of a bad seed is necessary to facilitate growth.

Your implicit accusations of pedophilia are so beyond the pale in sheer outrage that I trust in the absolute jurisprudence of the moderators to address this situation swiftly and efficiently.

I hope you feel better.

Thanks.

First, colton's account says he is 11. I went by that.

Language is only truly as foul as the one who beholds it.

I never, absolutely, said you were a pedophile. I simply told you to watch out because what if they were underage. You would become a registered sex offender(assuming you aren't already), that makes it a possibility.

My abuse report was made with good reason. Very good. You could be sexually soliciting minors in which, lack would be held partially responsible for not preventing, as such he now has the power and knowledge of what you can and may have already done.

Also, you continue to be a troll.

Sincerely,
Strife.

its true im eleven