btw there is no god

[oVo]

just wanted to make sure we were all clear on this

Actually, that statement doesn't clear up anything.

[Martin Ronne]

How can we be sure your motives are pure though? Under the "interests" section of your profile you wrote "Jesus, my wife and daughters, word origins, etc.
You lump wife and daughters as the same "interest"
Are you a child molester? Not to mention Jesus.

Woh there Simon! That's really uncalled for! I don't care if you flame, but that went a bit far don't you think? You just accused a man of molesting his own daughters! Why? Not because there's any truth to it. No, you accused him of molesting his daughters because you differ with him on another subject. That's really low.

[Neoteny]

How can we be sure your motives are pure though? Under the "interests" section of your profile you wrote "Jesus, my wife and daughters, word origins, etc.
You lump wife and daughters as the same "interest"
Are you a child molester? Not to mention Jesus.

Woh there Simon! That's really uncalled for! I don't care if you flame, but that went a bit far don't you think? You just accused a man of molesting his own daughters! Why? Not because there's any truth to it. No, you accused him of molesting his daughters because you differ with him on another subject. That's really low.

[Simon Viavant]

How can we be sure your motives are pure though? Under the "interests" section of your profile you wrote "Jesus, my wife and daughters, word origins, etc.
You lump wife and daughters as the same "interest"
Are you a child molester? Not to mention Jesus.

Woh there Simon! That's really uncalled for! I don't care if you flame, but that went a bit far don't you think? You just accused a man of molesting his own daughters! Why? Not because there's any truth to it. No, you accused him of molesting his daughters because you differ with him on another subject. That's really low.

Well he has his "interests" section of his profile with Jesus, Literature, word origins, etc, and then "wife and daughters" as one catagory, as though it's the same "interest". I have informed the authorities already.

[Dancing Mustard]

Woh there Simon! That's really uncalled for! I don't care if you flame, but that went a bit far don't you think? You just accused a man of molesting his own daughters! Why? Not because there's any truth to it. No, you accused him of molesting his daughters because you differ with him on another subject. That's really low.

[oVo]

Simon did not make an accusation,
he asked a couple questions.

DM just altered the phrase "and may god be with you" forever.

[Martin Ronne]

Woh there Simon! That's really uncalled for! I don't care if you flame, but that went a bit far don't you think? You just accused a man of molesting his own daughters! Why? Not because there's any truth to it. No, you accused him of molesting his daughters because you differ with him on another subject. That's really low.

It's not about being serious or not being serious. Look at any of my posts in the forum games and you'll see that I goof around all the time. If you could look in the now disbanded flame wars, you would see that I love to fling shit just as much as the next guy. But I would never make such an accusation. Calling someone an idiot or a dumbass, saying "na na na na boo boo" is actually somewhat expected from an internet forum goer. However, Simon went a bit to far.

[Simon Viavant]

I love to fling shit just as much as the next guy.

FLAME!!! BAN HIM!!!

[Martin Ronne]

How can we be sure your motives are pure though? Under the "interests" section of your profile you wrote "Jesus, my wife and daughters, word origins, etc.
You lump wife and daughters as the same "interest"
Are you a child molester? Not to mention Jesus.

Woh there Simon! That's really uncalled for! I don't care if you flame, but that went a bit far don't you think? You just accused a man of molesting his own daughters! Why? Not because there's any truth to it. No, you accused him of molesting his daughters because you differ with him on another subject. That's really low.

Well he has his "interests" section of his profile with Jesus, Literature, word origins, etc, and then "wife and daughters" as one catagory, as though it's the same "interest". I have informed the authorities already.

Light hearted or not, it's really despicable.

[muy_thaiguy]

How can we be sure your motives are pure though? Under the "interests" section of your profile you wrote "Jesus, my wife and daughters, word origins, etc.
You lump wife and daughters as the same "interest"
Are you a child molester? Not to mention Jesus.

Woh there Simon! That's really uncalled for! I don't care if you flame, but that went a bit far don't you think? You just accused a man of molesting his own daughters! Why? Not because there's any truth to it. No, you accused him of molesting his daughters because you differ with him on another subject. That's really low.

Well he has his "interests" section of his profile with Jesus, Literature, word origins, etc, and then "wife and daughters" as one catagory, as though it's the same "interest". I have informed the authorities already.

And that is known as a piss poor excuse for a "joke." Oh it may all seem like "yay! I makes a joke!" But when it goes to shit like that, that is just being an asshole of some of the highest caliber.

[daddy1gringo]

Don't worry about me. I'm blessed (Matthew5:11&12) The only thing that bothers me is that for a while the "wag the dog" was working. As usual, they talked as if it were some clear established fact that there is no God, so believers were just in denial of reality. When someone called their bluff, look at the lengths they went to to change the subject and distract from the fact that they had nothing.

btw, there is no god...just wanted to make sure we were all clear on this

Ok, make sure we're clear. Like you said. I'm still waiting.

[jay_a2j]

*Walks in room

*Reads a little

"Oh, another troll thread"

*Walks out of room

[neanderpaul14]

[daddy1gringo]

btw, there is no god...just wanted to make sure we were all clear on this

Ok, make sure we're clear. Like you said. I'm still waiting.

[jonesthecurl]

*Walks in room

*Reads a little

"Oh, another troll thread"

*Walks out of room

Jay can read and walk at the same time?

[AceGeneral***]

How can we be sure your motives are pure though? Under the "interests" section of your profile you wrote "Jesus, my wife and daughters, word origins, etc.
You lump wife and daughters as the same "interest"
Are you a child molester? Not to mention Jesus.

Woh there Simon! That's really uncalled for! I don't care if you flame, but that went a bit far don't you think? You just accused a man of molesting his own daughters! Why? Not because there's any truth to it. No, you accused him of molesting his daughters because you differ with him on another subject. That's really low.

Well he has his "interests" section of his profile with Jesus, Literature, word origins, etc, and then "wife and daughters" as one catagory, as though it's the same "interest". I have informed the authorities already.

my god is really despicable.

I worship the Internet, look at this http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=88971 have a read thru and be converted to Internetism or Internetity or Christernet, I haven't thought of a name

[Gregrios]

If you're so sure, why start a thread about it. You should be humbled in knowing you've got it right and the opposition has it wrong.

Bullshit.

The fact that he's so sure means that he absolutely should start a thread about it.

Why? Because it'll give him the ideal opportunity to point out how deluded, irrational and incapable of rational argument people like Gregrios are.

Ah yeah, it really isn't that funny. Maybe one smilie but it don't deserve that many. Sure it was funny the first couple hundred times but now it's just old news and frankly, so are you. No offence intended.

[Timminz]

Maybe this is a subject for another thread, but I have never seen any definitive proof of any sort of personified deity. If anyone has some, I would love to see it.

[Gregrios]

Maybe this is a subject for another thread, but I have never seen any definitive proof of any sort of personified deity. If anyone has some, I would love to see it.

At the present time all we got for proof is the Bible itself. But if you don't believe the Bible to be legit then I guess you'll just have to wait and see.

[Timminz]

Maybe this is a subject for another thread, but I have never seen any definitive proof of any sort of personified deity. If anyone has some, I would love to see it.

At the present time all we got for proof is the Bible itself. But if you don't believe the Bible to be legit then I guess you'll just have to wait and see.

Is that a "No, but..."?

[PLAYER57832]

Maybe this is a subject for another thread, but I have never seen any definitive proof of any sort of personified deity. If anyone has some, I would love to see it.

At the present time all we got for proof is the Bible itself. But if you don't believe the Bible to be legit then I guess you'll just have to wait and see.

Is that a "No, but..."?

Pretty much. It something you have to experience for yourself.

Which is why it is faith and not science, though logical minds can and do accept both.
But we have been over this so many times, I don't think anyone here really wants and answer

[Timminz]

Don't get me wrong. I have no problem believing that there is a "power" greater than we can fully comprehend. The problem I have (well, one of them) is the whole "my accepted version of the higher power is the only one possible". I don't really understand how someone can believe in a higher power, and can still possibly think that they can fully understand it. Also, the concept of the personified deity.

[JJM]

I know that god exists. Historical proof: People seen with there own eyes the miracles of Jesus. Just study the Roman Empire and you will find mention of him. Scientific proof: There has been something found on a mountain in Iran that looks like a ship of some sort. Although there was something about it ( I think it was the age of it ) that causes them to not be able to determine what substance it is made out of but it does fit the measurements of Noah's ark as described in the Bible. There have been claim fossils found on mountains too. They must have been put there by a flood.

[neanderpaul14]

[john9blue]

Dumbest religion thread ever. Course, it's a religion thread, hence the replies and subsequent argument.