Conquer Club

White Moose wrote:

rbelgrod wrote:

White Moose wrote:There could be some point dumping going on here accually. Mageplunka isnt that bad on AoR to lose so many games so easy to rbelgod

now how can you be a fair judge there moose? you played 5 games with him and won all 5?
like i said if i really wanted to cheat, i would have 2 computers , 1 normal and 1 with NS Edit and be in most of his games, or i could have like 15 non-premium names to cheat, then nobody could ever figure it out. i think i would be a field mashall by now, not to be rude with you, but come on. why the hell would i waste my time to get 14 points a game, when i could just join a game with my own ranked players in a private terminator or something like that and get 180 points or more and at the most lose like 39 points? i have much better things to do with my time, not to mention how boring that would be anyway.i am glad to see my friends at my defense, and hopefully this will just go away, and ill tell my son, i can never teach or play with him, ( boy im sure that would spark an interest in him to play this site) and i can send him to someone else, so they can have all his points, and they could be accused of cheating....total BS.and alot of mageplunkas wins were from 6 player assassins, not 2 player. so he does not understand the concept of getting the win. so think what you may, but this really takes the fun out of this site when someone can accuse someone and just cause so much turmoil

Geez... i just said there COULD BE.. not saying it is. But losing 60 in a row is insane... and there almost have to be something fishy about it.

well its kinda like telling someone not to touch the hot stove, sooner or later they get burned till they listen.....thats what i saw. believe me i was there...lol.......he was just eager to win and kept doing crazy things.finally i got real bored and walked to his room and said what that hell are you doing idiot? he just looked at me and said " what ?" . so i then explained off line what the hell to do and went to bed.end of story...lol

Lindax wrote:If I'm teaching somebody I play doubles with them, that way you avoid any of this.

.

that's how i learned... very good point...-6cd

Sorry, but this is obvious- you only have to take a look at the numbers- and regardless how the players act or play in other games against other players, this is one of the most blatant and obvious cases of throwing points.
Oh well, who cares? Keep it up, mate, it's not like anyone give's a shit.

"gcwa - keep your ADD in check, the rest, proceed."

RashidJelzin wrote:Sorry, but this is obvious- you only have to take a look at the numbers- and regardless how the players act or play in other games against other players, this is one of the most blatant and obvious cases of throwing points.
Oh well, who cares? Keep it up, mate, it's not like anyone give's a shit.

"gcwa - keep your ADD in check, the rest, proceed."

Well, if no one gave a $hit - this thread would never have started, eh? I do however agree with you whole-heartedly RJ (RashidJelzin).

Lindax wrote:If I'm teaching somebody I play doubles with them, that way you avoid any of this.

.

There would be a problem with that. The way you play doubles on Age of Realms 1 and the way you play singles on it is very different. That is something you would either have to learn on your own, or like is going on here, have someone help you learn it.

RashidJelzin wrote:Sorry, but this is obvious- you only have to take a look at the numbers- and regardless how the players act or play in other games against other players, this is one of the most blatant and obvious cases of throwing points.
Oh well, who cares? Keep it up, mate, it's not like anyone give's a shit.

"gcwa - keep your ADD in check, the rest, proceed."

Just a bit ahead of ya RashidJelzin.

Rblgrod is no cheat played many games with against him....

i cant believe rbelgod is a cheat, he is nothing but a good honest guy!!! im sure the right verdict will be met and rbel is cleared of any wrong doing.

look forward to our next game rich.

rbel doesnt cheat
Anyone who has played with/against him knows he is a solid player
if anything this is just a case of the OP having WAY too much time on his hands

If this guy gets banned for teaching hi kid how to play, I for one will not be renewing my membership!

gcwca_4_life wrote:

Lindax wrote:If I'm teaching somebody I play doubles with them, that way you avoid any of this.

.

There would be a problem with that. The way you play doubles on Age of Realms 1 and the way you play singles on it is very different. That is something you would either have to learn on your own, or like is going on here, have someone help you learn it.

Word, at least this way he got tips from his opponent. Imagine trying to learn AoR without any help, it would take way too long.

Frop wrote:rbelgrod is a really good triples player and Mageplunka obviously sucks ass at 1v1. These Map Rank stats however are still a tad odd, Mageplunka should've been able to win a few of those 61 games.

Map Rank For Mageplunka
Options: versus rbelgrod | Number of Players: 2

Code: Select all

Map               Points   Win/Loss
Totals            -829     0 from 61 (0%)
Age Of Realms 1   -579     0 from 43 (0%)
Age Of Realms 2   -15      0 from 1 (0%)
Age Of Realms 3   -235     0 from 17 (0%)

Map Rank For Mageplunka
Options: excluding rbelgrod | Number of Players: 2

Code: Select all

Map               Points   Win/Loss
Totals            -1964    91 from 313 (29%)
Age Of Realms 1   -976     39 from 146 (27%)
Age Of Realms 2   -599     30 from 87 (34%)
Age Of Realms 3   -389     22 from 80 (28%)

Once again... people are all like I know the guy, I have played games with him he would never cheat. Do you know the player in real life, no you don't.. you don't know how low some of these high rankers stoop because they can get away with it... Rather than just going on your personal impressions of the guy... have a look at the statistics presented above. This is broad fact, not just speculation, which implies that something is amiss between the two. A block should be placed in my opinion.

Snorri1234 wrote:

gcwca_4_life wrote:

Lindax wrote:If I'm teaching somebody I play doubles with them, that way you avoid any of this.

.

There would be a problem with that. The way you play doubles on Age of Realms 1 and the way you play singles on it is very different. That is something you would either have to learn on your own, or like is going on here, have someone help you learn it.

Word, at least this way he got tips from his opponent. Imagine trying to learn AoR without any help, it would take way too long.

I happend to win my very first 6-player aor2 game, no help at all... AoR is easy, just look at the legend..

I just map ranked Mage for one of Blitz's threads and realized that he isn't one that just started playing. Interesting that he would lose 60-0 after playing almost 5500 games. I'm not the one that bases guilt solely upon numbers but if I'm reading this correctly, 100% after so many games especially with Mage's experience seems a bit unbelievable. Not that my opinion or anyone else that has posted here will make a bit of difference when they make the ruling.

Scott-Land wrote:(...) Not that my opinion or anyone else that has posted here will make a bit of difference when they make the ruling.

That's not entirely true, I understand they do appreciate any input as long as proper argumentation is provided.

White Moose wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:

gcwca_4_life wrote:

Lindax wrote:If I'm teaching somebody I play doubles with them, that way you avoid any of this.

.

There would be a problem with that. The way you play doubles on Age of Realms 1 and the way you play singles on it is very different. That is something you would either have to learn on your own, or like is going on here, have someone help you learn it.

Word, at least this way he got tips from his opponent. Imagine trying to learn AoR without any help, it would take way too long.

I happend to win my very first 6-player aor2 game, no help at all... AoR is easy, just look at the legend..

Really? I've lost every game there simply because I tried to work out the legend and then i was already dead.

Scott-Land wrote:I just map ranked Mage for one of Blitz's threads and realized that he isn't one that just started playing. Interesting that he would lose 60-0 after playing almost 5500 games. I'm not the one that bases guilt solely upon numbers but if I'm reading this correctly, 100% after so many games especially with Mage's experience seems a bit unbelievable. Not that my opinion or anyone else that has posted here will make a bit of difference when they make the ruling.

well he is talking about 1v1 in aor1, not 6 man assassin, totally different games as far as strategy and gameplay.as you should know. he does real well at the 6 man, he just sucks at 1v1. and its not like he NEVER beat me in any games, i lost alot of points to him also in the past ,as anyone can check . and i know if i go to play a pearl harbor or newer game that i dont know, i would lose alot to someone who knows the ins and outs of the game.bonuses, warp holes...etc, till i understood the game. so, i said i wont play with him anymore on anything that is opposition and if i really wanted to cheat, there are a hell of alot easier ways to do it without wasting all my time in a 1v1 for 8-14 points. so either drop all this crap and move on or throw me the hell out, and ill just come back and play assassins until i become a colonel again in a few months. it really is starting to get old. what more do you want me to say or do that i have not already. what about all those games we go in and all you see in a 3 man game are the other two talking like old chums and every time, they take you out 1st regard-less of whos really winning? are they multis too? this is really getting old.or the guys in doodle assassin or other games like it who say take me out so we dont lose points to the cook and then they foe him,so they dont lose points and throw the game to a ranked player ? is that being a multi too? we all had that happen to us at the start. i just want to play the games, not have to keep going to court. all because 1 person had nothing better to do with their time.

if i was playing against my son i would want to kick his ass too and probly would seen he was learning but i dont have a son only daughters lol

rbelgrod and Mageplunka are blocked.

Frop's post of those wins/losses can't be ignored. 63 games of one-on-one, and one player never winning in that setting is just too unbelievable, plus the fact that these players are playing under the same roof arouses enough suspicion.

king achilles wrote:rbelgrod and Mageplunka are blocked.

Frop's post of those wins/losses can't be ignored. 63 games of one-on-one, and one player never winning in that setting is just too unbelievable, plus the fact that these players are playing under the same roof arouses enough suspicion.

complete bs!

king achilles wrote:rbelgrod and Mageplunka are blocked.

Frop's post of those wins/losses can't be ignored. 63 games of one-on-one, and one player never winning in that setting is just too unbelievable, plus the fact that these players are playing under the same roof arouses enough suspicion.

well its not like he never won in any games, you can look at that yourself. but whatever you decide, he sid if we are blocked he was dropping out of cc, so whatever blocked means,i will go along with. doesnt,t matter anyway since he will drop out anyway.

rbelgrod wrote: i spoke to him about it and he did say that in some games when he saw he could not win the game ( and only in a few) he made it so i would.

I'm afraid he'll just have to accept the consequences as such actions do merit a block.

nagerous wrote:

rbelgrod wrote: i spoke to him about it and he did say that in some games when he saw he could not win the game ( and only in a few) he made it so i would.

I'm afraid he'll just have to accept the consequences as such actions do merit a block.

Er - Surely this means nothing in a 1v1 game...

Several times when I've been dead in the water in a 1v1 game I've just burned all my troops - so that the other player will be able to win a bit quicker.

C.

They have played more than just 1vs1s together

Game 3269641 Game 3267760 Game 3267726
Game 3261689Game 3261617 Game 3247655

A lot of assassins to win in a row..

nagerous wrote:They have played more than just 1vs1s together

Game 3269641 Game 3267760 Game 3267726
Game 3261689Game 3261617 Game 3247655

A lot of assassins to win in a row..

we have also played Game 3542112Game 2814052 [player]2878772[/player]Game 2887971Game 2888590Game 3542112, so what are you trying to start now. cant someone just play better than others?