Conquer Club

I really hope that is a male nipple. If it is female, you will be banned and censored.

PS Yes, I know that is the point you are trying to make. And for that reason, I won't comment on if I am turned on by it or not.

owenshooter wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

Robinette wrote:How about a "Black Face" Brian Peppers on a crucifix?

I'm all for it! Can we submerge the crucifix in a jar of urine and take a picture of it so it looks ethereal?

i should bring that out of retirement, just for the giggles!!!-0

p.s.-nice nipple!!

Oh, please don't...

or i'll have to rub shite all over my face, take a pic, and call it "Black face beauty"

I think that if you dont like then put him your ignore list and leave it at that.. when i first looked at it i just thought it was a bigger person.. or just some abnormality i actually still dont know what this picture is other than a normal looking person, maybe because of his big cheecks?...but whatever it is you dont know if he is making fun of the person or trying to cause awareness and have you to feel sympathy.. and as it being offensive then get over it.. youll find things that are offensive and something cant be changed.. people might say LFAW avatar is offensive because the people are naked or it is promoting sex or its not suitable for the younger players on CC.. Some people might say players with the American flag as their avatar is offensive to not showing enough respect for the flag, or someone might hate America or plenty of other reasons. Things will be offensive- just ignore it and get over it.. but his avatar is not offensive and should not be changed.

He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.

hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.

some find spamming up the GD with turtle avatars offensive... ahem...-0

owenshooter wrote:

hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.

some find spamming up the GD with turtle avatars offensive... ahem...-0

QFT -Yeah !

hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.

Ok i could be missing something here.. i dont recognize the picture.. but even if it is a sex offender then still maybe hes happy that this person is caught, or showing to people that if you commit those crimes then you'll be found and convicted one day.. a picture can say a 1000 words.. but what words does the person mean to say when they put it up is a different question. In any answer, if he means it to be praising the actions of this individual then thats his opinion- messed up it may be.. CC has no rules restricting anything said or done in avatars.

Diamonds14 wrote:CC has no rules restricting anything said or done in avatars.

yes they do... it is a great unwritten... if someone complains about your avatar or an avatar, somehow they determine
if it is offensive. and if it is found offensive, you are politely asked to remove it. so, there is a way to have an avatar changed if it is truly offensive, but this is not one of those. you obviously missed the 19 page epic about this in which the mods attempted
to explain it all:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=59020&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&hilit=offensive+avatars

anyway, nothing is offensive about wumps avatar, this is just another personal attack on the wumpster...-0

p.s.-tom should be more worried about the hilarious mis-spelled word in his clan sig that has us all giggling at them....

Diamonds14 wrote:

hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.

Ok i could be missing something here.. i dont recognize the picture.. but even if it is a sex offender then still maybe hes happy that this person is caught, or showing to people that if you commit those crimes then you'll be found and convicted one day.. a picture can say a 1000 words.. but what words does the person mean to say when they put it up is a different question. In any answer, if he means it to be praising the actions of this individual then thats his opinion- messed up it may be.. CC has no rules restricting anything said or done in avatars.

When did that start making sense? You never see somebody brandishing a sports team logo because your happy that they lost (unless it's done in an offensive manner, such as with drawings on it, or in the case of one bar I went to, they had the jersey of the other hockey team on the floor for people to walk on) or waving a Swastika flag because they're happy that the nazi's lost the war. 1ump is a troll. This new avatar of his is him trolling. Also, CC does have rules on avatars. Read the forum guidelines, they apply to avatars too.

KoE_Sirius wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.

some find spamming up the GD with turtle avatars offensive... ahem...-0

QFT -Yeah !

Everybody having the same, or similar, avatars is a great way to show support for something. Whether it be for a clan or just showing support for the site owner during a time when the site was being attacked by trolls and multi's, as was the case of the turtle avatars.

Trolling is trolling regardless of the target. So basically the turtles were trolling against all the people who disagree with management.

On an unrelated note, why does the trailer for Iron Man (released on DVD) feature the song Back in Black by AC/DC? That makes absolutely no sense.

hecter wrote:blah, blah, blah...

hecter, you can't see the forest for the trees... wump is not trolling with his avatar, and your turtles were/are
annoying... there is nothing offensive about his avatar, period. you found my old avatar offensive, a month after
i was flying it, and someone mentioned what it was in a thread!!! let it go. nobody cares, it is an avatar, it is not
offensive. it is a pic of a guy, period.-0

That makes absolutely no sense. I wear a turtle avatar to show support for the site. It's no different than somebody wearing a clan avatar to show support for their clan. wump is wearing an avatar of a known convicted sex offender. My morals tells me that raping somebody is wrong and offensive. Sorry that you feel differently.

And when did I ever find one of your avatars offensive?

hecter wrote:That makes absolutely no sense. I wear a turtle avatar to show support for the site. It's no different than somebody wearing a clan avatar to show support for their clan. wump is wearing an avatar of a known convicted sex offender. My morals tells me that raping somebody is wrong and offensive. Sorry that you feel differently.

And when did I ever find one of your avatars offensive?

A lot of people found Piss Christ quite offensive, but only after they had found out how the effect of that otherworldly light surrounding the crucifix had been achieved.

MeDeFe wrote:

hecter wrote:That makes absolutely no sense. I wear a turtle avatar to show support for the site. It's no different than somebody wearing a clan avatar to show support for their clan. wump is wearing an avatar of a known convicted sex offender. My morals tells me that raping somebody is wrong and offensive. Sorry that you feel differently.

And when did I ever find one of your avatars offensive?

A lot of people found Piss Christ quite offensive, but only after they had found out how the effect of that otherworldly light surrounding the crucifix had been achieved.

See, while I can understand how people could find a urine soaked Jesus offensive, we're talking about how I found it offensive. As owen said,

owenshooter wrote:you found my old avatar offensive, a month after

Which I didn't.

Nephilim wrote:for the first time ever, firth has made an actual contribution to civilized debate. apparently the dude pictured in the avy in question is an internet sensation for more than just his physical appearance. thus, loser geeks like firth and wump know exactly who he is, and apparently whump wants us to know that he knows.....back away from the edge, tom, whump is a moron and you can sleep peacefully, mmmm k?

You're fucking hilarious. And cool.

Keep it up. *thumbs up*

hiddendragon wrote:

nagerous wrote:

hiddendragon wrote:

t-o-m wrote:It sadens me to think that someone would make humour out of it.

What are your views on it?
[player]wrestler1ump[/player]
mod edit
He seems to find the most offensive Avatars he can find...If he had half the skills at the game that he does to offend he might have a decent rank...He's just another skilless forum debutante, much like snori and anarkist

Hey snorri and anarkist are cool guys, who contribute effectively to the website... please don't classify them in the same group.

Bah, they're no-life bums...

Right, posting on internet-forums is for no-life bums but polishing your skill in a simple online game isn't.

owenshooter wrote:p.s.-tom should be more worried about the hilarious mis-spelled word in his clan sig that has us all giggling at them....

I just saw it.

Diamonds14 wrote: if it is a sex offender then still maybe hes happy that this person is caught, or showing to people that if you commit those crimes then you'll be found and convicted one day.. a picture can say a 1000 words.. but what words does the person mean to say when they put it up is a different question.

Wooo!!! Hitler avatars for all!

Don't worry though, we're all just saying that we don't like people who are mean to Jews.

Then, and here's a really great idea, we'll all get avatars of beaten spouses with black-eyes and stuff. But it won't be offensive, it'll just be us saying that we don't like people who glorify domestic violence.

Who knows what we could do after that... perhaps we could move on to pictures of mutilated corpses, to let everybody know that we find death a scary and sobering concept?

But remember, not a single bit of it will be offensive, because our pictures can only be taken to mean what we say they mean... and no matter how much alarm, disgust, offence or revulsion they evoke in others, it's only our alleged message which counts.

My retard brother looks just like westler1ump's avy...it reminds me that I should feed him tonight....under the stairs!

t-o-m wrote:It sadens me to think that someone would make humour out of it.

What are your views on it?
[player]wrestler1ump[/player]

1) He's a sex offender who raped underage girls.
2) I tried to take it down minutes after putting it up and put a picture of a dog in but it wouldn't let me.

Snorri1234 wrote:

owenshooter wrote:p.s.-tom should be more worried about the hilarious mis-spelled word in his clan sig that has us all giggling at them....

I just saw it.

i am following tom around the forums for the joy of laughing at his clan sig...almost as good as blitz's whacked reflection in his thota sig!!-0

Some more points now that I've read this entire ridiculous thread:

1) Move this thread to flame wars.
2) t-o-m is the last person who should be trying to uphold moral standards on here.
3) hecter is a troll for his turtle pictures and spam threads, so he should not be accusing anybody else.
4) If you're so offended, why don't you file a cheating and abuse report? Or stop coming here.
5) Thank you for the support Owen. It is nice to know that someone is in touch with reality.
6) I love how everyone feels it is okay to make humour out of a person losing their dog, but freaks out over an avatarmod edit Hypocrasy at its finest.
7) The avatar stays.
Let's start a black face Brian Peppers on a cross thread in the Banned thread.

1) He's a sex offender who raped underage girls.

I'm more disturbed by this fact over anything else.

Well of course he raped them....have you seen his face???? I hardly doubt many chicks WANT to have sex with him.

hiddendragon wrote:

nagerous wrote:

hiddendragon wrote:

t-o-m wrote:It sadens me to think that someone would make humour out of it.

What are your views on it?
[player]wrestler1ump[/player]
mod edit
He seems to find the most offensive Avatars he can find...If he had half the skills at the game that he does to offend he might have a decent rank...He's just another skilless forum debutante, much like snori and anarkist

Hey snorri and anarkist are cool guys, who contribute effectively to the website... please don't classify them in the same group.

Bah, they're no-life bums...

The same could be said about anyone brigadier or above on this website... then again I forget CC risk is serious business.