Conquer Club

Shrinky wrote:This reminds me of xtratabasco and all those out there who foe list ppl for playing freestyle team games at the same time

EDIT: ofc xtra got banned(for something different), but where are the rest of u out there

The great thing about xtra is you can repeatedly join his games and he can't do anything about it as because he is a banned user he has no access to foe lists any more.

this is rediculous. I plan on giving Wicked all 1 stars on my rating report and I hope everyone else follows !

nagerous wrote:

Shrinky wrote:This reminds me of xtratabasco and all those out there who foe list ppl for playing freestyle team games at the same time

EDIT: ofc xtra got banned(for something different), but where are the rest of u out there

The great thing about xtra is you can repeatedly join his games and he can't do anything about it as because he is a banned user he has no access to foe lists any more.

is that why i couldnt click on xtra's profile?

Mr. Chump, hi. I love you.

The flaming of wrestler1ump outside of flame wars has got to stop! I have said this time and time again yet for some reason the "moderators" don't seem to do anything about it. All flaming posts have been reported. Maybe they can consider giving fewer than 5 warnings before a forum ban this time...

wrestler1ump wrote:the moderators don't seem to do anything about it

would it help if you didnt accuse them of abusing their position?

wrestler1ump wrote:The flaming of wrestler1ump outside of flame wars has got to stop! I have said this time and time again yet for some reason the "moderators" don't seem to do anything about it. All flaming posts have been reported. Maybe they can consider giving fewer than 5 warnings before a forum ban this time...

it gets harder when you post posts like this.

T-O-M wrote:Hi, Mr. Chump. I love you.

Natewolfman wrote:i honestly cant grasp what your trying to say because of so much falcities... if wicked is a cheater in the above games, then i must be do because i was in most of them
and blemishes on my record are not wished
what happened above is (since apparently you dont know the story) klobber (the player wrestler is talking about) joins games to play brand new players and noone else so he can demolish them for easy points, he is the bad guy in this, wicked and others joined some of his games to try and break him of this trend, so as far as i am seeing, based on what your saying, with the anti-high ranks play low ranks aditude, wicked is the hero of this story?

The difference between you and wicked is that klobber can put you on foe, but he cannot do the same to wicked. The fact that he plays worthless n00bs and robs them of their points does not give a moderator the right to enter his games without his permission. wicked does not have the right to join his game to break any trend. Hell she won't let half the people in flame wars play with her, so what makes her think she can suddenly go into any game where she is not wanted.

By the way, in one of the game chats klobber said that if he could put her on his ignore list he would, which is enough proof to me that she is not wanted in those games.

wrestler1ump wrote:

Natewolfman wrote:i honestly cant grasp what your trying to say because of so much falcities... if wicked is a cheater in the above games, then i must be do because i was in most of them
and blemishes on my record are not wished
what happened above is (since apparently you dont know the story) klobber (the player wrestler is talking about) joins games to play brand new players and noone else so he can demolish them for easy points, he is the bad guy in this, wicked and others joined some of his games to try and break him of this trend, so as far as i am seeing, based on what your saying, with the anti-high ranks play low ranks aditude, wicked is the hero of this story?

The difference between you and wicked is that klobber can put you on foe, but he cannot do the same to wicked. The fact that he plays worthless n00bs and robs them of their points does not give a moderator the right to enter his games without his permission. wicked does not have the right to join his game to break any trend. Hell she won't let half the people in flame wars play with her, so what makes her think she can suddenly go into any game where she is not wanted.

By the way, in one of the game chats klobber said that if he could put her on his ignore list he would, which is enough proof to me that she is not wanted in those games.

no, he doesn't... as far is i saw. which game number and which line of chat?

wrestler1ump wrote:The flaming of wrestler1ump outside of flame wars has got to stop! I have said this time and time again yet for some reason the "moderators" don't seem to do anything about it. All flaming posts have been reported. Maybe they can consider giving fewer than 5 warnings before a forum ban this time...

Please do keep in mind that some of us (myself included) are not flaming you. I do think your constant abuse of the cheating and abuse forum is disruptive and since you seem to lack any sort of concrete, factual data for the lion's share of your claims, you might also be in need of being reported.

Accusing someone of cheating or abuse is a serious matter. Sure, it's an internet gaming site, but some of us come here for our free time to have a relaxing time post-work. The reason you constantly find yourself as a target is because you make yourself one. As a great man once said, "A closed mouth gathers no foot."

If Wicked were indeed cheating or abusing the system, so be it. You need to provide concrete proof before making such accusations, especially since you say it exists. Give a cite - a link that shows the information. If Klobber indeed does not want her in his games, it is his responsibility to speak up. He's perfectly capable of it. I'm actually reasonably confident that the mods and Wicked in particular would avoid his games if asked. Let's put it to the test and see.

wrestler1ump wrote:The difference between you and wicked is that klobber can put you on foe, but he cannot do the same to wicked.

The fault herein lies with the system, and has been suggested by many, including myself, the foe lists should be separated so this isn't an issue. Your beef here is in the wrong forum - you should be posting to the suggestions forum in the thread already started on this very topic (somewhere, happy searching). If Klobber wants to put forth an abuse complaint against me for "joining his game" then he can do so. But for now, he hasn't complained, so this entire thread is moot (in my player, non-mod opinion).

bedub1 wrote:Can we burn her at the steak and enjoy the BBQ?

medium please.

wicked wrote::lol: Thanks the laugh whump. I needed that.

Just in case someone believes any of this, Klobber never asked for me not to join his games. I see nothing in the game chats either.

For the record:

Wicked, please do not ever enter any of my games under any circumstances. Is that clear?

t-o-m wrote:

wrestler1ump wrote:the moderators don't seem to do anything about it

would it help if you didnt accuse them of abusing their position?

Would it help the revenues of this site overall if the moderators would refrain from clearly abusing their positions?

Personally, I don't care one way or another; I chalk up the pettiness of the moderators here to being part of the nature of a rinky-dink, unprofessional little Mickey-Mouse game site. But still, how many people have seen this thread so far? I wonder how it has affected their decisions as to whether to pay the premium or not.

Food for thought.

EDIT:

On a more positive note, perhaps a solution to this serious moderator pettiness and abuse issue would be to give them slightly more money (if they receive any -- that I do not know), and slightly less power.

One good example would be to allow members to ban them from joining their games, but still allow them to send official (non-harassing) PM's. I know that the "non-harassing" part of that last suggestion will be hard for Wicked to swallow, but still, it has become necessary, unfortunately.

Also, if these petty moderators are to be given more money, then of course the premiums will have to go up, but I think that will be worth its benefits, as people who are happy in their own lives generally don't go out of their way to abuse the miniscule amount of authority that they have been given just to hurt other innocent people.

Indeed

KLOBBER wrote:

wicked wrote::lol: Thanks the laugh whump. I needed that.

Just in case someone believes any of this, Klobber never asked for me not to join his games. I see nothing in the game chats either.

For the record:

Wicked, please do not ever enter any of my games under any circumstances. Is that clear?

hehe i thought your points took a little tumble Kob.. well played Wicked!

As to the accusation: i think, this being Koblers first mention of his desire for Wicked not to join, that she is exonerated completely.
Even if abuse were to be perceived in this type of case, it can't be a ruling based on retrospection.

Everyone's points on this site are in a constant state of fluctuation.

Mine happen to be at the lower end of my usual scale, and they are going to pop right back up, guaranteed.

KLOBBER wrote:Everyone's points on this site are in a constant state of fluctuation.

Mine happen to be at the lower end of my usual scale, and they are going to pop right back up, guaranteed.

I agree with you Kob! do you also agree with my second point?

Jim, your second point is not my concern, as I am not the one making the accusation.

I was not even aware until now that it was considered abuse of authority for a mod to enter into games with a player who he (or she) knows does not want him (or her) in those games.

Is it?

KLOBBER wrote:Jim, your second point is not my concern, as I am not the one making the accusation.

I was not even aware until now that it was considered abuse of authority for a mod to enter into games with a player who he (or she) knows does not want him (or her) in those games.

Is it?

your opinion is key being as Wrestler is defending you. So i reckon as you do not see it as abuse there is no case to answer here at all.

but yes i would think that it would be considered abuse if you had asked her not to join and she did.
However, i have seen Wicked say on more than one occasion that if a user PM's her, instructing that they would rather she did not join their games, that she will not.

jiminski wrote:

KLOBBER wrote:Jim, your second point is not my concern, as I am not the one making the accusation.

I was not even aware until now that it was considered abuse of authority for a mod to enter into games with a player who he (or she) knows does not want him (or her) in those games.

Is it?

your opinion is key being as Wrestler is defending you. So i reckon as you do not see it as abuse there is no case to answer here at all.

but yes i would think that it would be considered abuse if you had asked her not to join and she did.
However, i have seen Wicked say on more than one occasion that if a user PM's her, instructing that they would rather she did not join their games, that she will not.

1. I hope you're not a lawyer, because you would starve.

2. "Wrestler is defending" me against what?

3. I never said that I didn't see Wicked's actions as abuse. I said that I was not the one making the accusation, and that I did not realize until now that her entering my games against my will was considered abuse.

4. Her stating that she would not enter a player's game if requested not to and then doing it anyway, and that action being considered abuse are two different subjects (the fact that she is a liar is not the point of my question). Is this blatantly dishonest, unsportsmanlike, and petty action of hers considered abuse or not?

It appears to be simple really,moderators,who are the "police force" of CC should not play.
In the case of wicked,the problem appears to be that unsportsman like play is happening.It is strange that this particular person is taking the flak,but that happens if one is in a position of resposibility.What maybe iratating is that this particular person seems to shrug everything of with a laugh.IT AINT FUNNY.
The Avatar says it all

mancunia wrote:It appears to be simple really,moderators,who are the "police force" of CC should not play.
In the case of wicked,the problem appears to be that unsportsman like play is happening.It is strange that this particular person is taking the flak,but that happens if one is in a position of resposibility.What maybe iratating is that this particular person seems to shrug everything of with a laugh.IT AINT FUNNY.
The Avatar says it all

what unsportsman like play.... moderaters deserve to play games. they'll go crazy if they didn't. they play fair, play good, and kick butt.

Still the most simple solution is when the friggin' finally separate foe list from banning people from games and foe list from removing chat from appearing.

Most people I just don't want in my games again, I don't mind reading their chat. Only a select few I don't care to read the chat.

KLOBBER wrote:
1. I hope you're not a lawyer, because you would starve.

2. "Wrestler is defending" me against what?

3. I never said that I didn't see Wicked's actions as abuse. I said that I was not the one making the accusation, and that I did not realize until now that her entering my games against my will was considered abuse.

4. Her stating that she would not enter a player's game if requested not to and then doing it anyway, and that action being considered abuse are two different subjects (the fact that she is a liar is not the point of my question). Is this blatantly dishonest, unsportsmanlike, and petty action of hers considered abuse or not?

Well you perpetually edit your posts to suit your 'truth'.... so:

Just to be sure : Are you saying that you had asked her not to join before she joined?

Exactly what I said can be seen clearly in my post and in your cut-and-paste of my post.

You try very hard to twist my words, but this fish ain't biting.