Page 2 of 7

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:00 am
by cisco2001
I looked at these games. Soloman, you are very effectively tying your own noose. However, if you and your brother are not playing favorites and, in fact, he is just another player; then a block should not be a problem. I personally don't have any problem with not be able to play in a game with any one player on this site.

Do you?

Cisco2001

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:00 pm
by Soloman
cisco2001 wrote:I looked at these games. Soloman, you are very effectively tying your own noose. However, if you and your brother are not playing favorites and, in fact, he is just another player; then a block should not be a problem. I personally don't have any problem with not be able to play in a game with any one player on this site.

Do you?

Cisco2001
yes I do I enjoy battling my bro at times and I am tired of unfound accusations. For everyone of you people who beleive favortism was shown compare these games where we went hard at each other due to opprtunity and positioning, explain the Logs and attacks away if favortism is being shown

Game 162288

Game 215641

Game 261101

Game 1666665

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:13 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Soloman wrote:
cisco2001 wrote:I looked at these games. Soloman, you are very effectively tying your own noose. However, if you and your brother are not playing favorites and, in fact, he is just another player; then a block should not be a problem. I personally don't have any problem with not be able to play in a game with any one player on this site.

Do you?

Cisco2001
yes I do I enjoy battling my bro at times and I am tired of unfound accusations. For everyone of you people who beleive favortism was shown compare these games where we went hard at each other due to opprtunity and positioning, explain the Logs and attacks away if favortism is being shown

Game 162288

Game 215641

Game 261101

Game 1666665


rofl ! I looked at the first game and pissed my pants from laughing. First, the game was played Jan. of 2007....rofl. second, you attacked him a big whooping 2 times the entire game and im sure it was just 1 big army that you had to take for either a card or to run through to eliminate an opponent. your a tool. the more you post, the more you dig yourself into a hole. looking forward to your next excuse to get out of this cheating accusation. Please King A, make an example from this.

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:30 pm
by Soloman
There is a Fundamental lack of logic anyone who can read and comprehend the game log can see the truth. When you battle you secure a postion then attack other as best you can workig your way to areas you are nto strong in which I did in. It is obvious you got some type of issue with me and my brother Kool that is your thing. I never was into male groupies like you get a life and learn to read a log.

Your accusations are not supported by facts and you cannot respond to any counter points with any sense so it is evident your only point is to stir up the pot and try to create something so you can get attention. I have enough kids I do not need to add another I am done with you and your ilk.

Holler at me when you have something legitmate and can answer to what happened in the rest of our games(mine and my brothers) out of 107 and you can show a consistant pattern on all our games, not speculation on a few hand picked ones. I will not be responding any further so the floor is yours I know you want it so please just continue to ramble on and catch as many eyes as you so desperately and obviously desire.

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:56 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Soloman wrote:There is a Fundamental lack of logic anyone who can read and comprehend the game log can see the truth. When you battle you secure a postion then attack other as best you can workig your way to areas you are nto strong in which I did in. It is obvious you got some type of issue with me and my brother Kool that is your thing. I never was into male groupies like you get a life and learn to read a log.

Your accusations are not supported by facts and you cannot respond to any counter points with any sense so it is evident your only point is to stir up the pot and try to create something so you can get attention. I have enough kids I do not need to add another I am done with you and your ilk.

Holler at me when you have something legitmate and can answer to what happened in the rest of our games(mine and my brothers) out of 107 and you can show a consistant pattern on all our games, not speculation on a few hand picked ones. I will not be responding any further so the floor is yours I know you want it so please just continue to ramble on and catch as many eyes as you so desperately and obviously desire.
I was curious which approach you would take next. you picked the .... shit im busted so lets just lay low and see what happens next approach. since you have nothing to defend yourself with and the facts are layed out on the table that you guys have been cheating for a long period of time, theres not many more options you can choose from.

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:02 pm
by risk master2000
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Soloman wrote:There is a Fundamental lack of logic anyone who can read and comprehend the game log can see the truth. When you battle you secure a postion then attack other as best you can workig your way to areas you are nto strong in which I did in. It is obvious you got some type of issue with me and my brother Kool that is your thing. I never was into male groupies like you get a life and learn to read a log.

Your accusations are not supported by facts and you cannot respond to any counter points with any sense so it is evident your only point is to stir up the pot and try to create something so you can get attention. I have enough kids I do not need to add another I am done with you and your ilk.

Holler at me when you have something legitmate and can answer to what happened in the rest of our games(mine and my brothers) out of 107 and you can show a consistant pattern on all our games, not speculation on a few hand picked ones. I will not be responding any further so the floor is yours I know you want it so please just continue to ramble on and catch as many eyes as you so desperately and obviously desire.
I was curious which approach you would take next. you picked the .... shit im busted so lets just lay low and see what happens next approach. since you have nothing to defend yourself with and the facts are layed out on the table that you guys have been cheating for a long period of time, theres not many more options you can choose from.


your a douche you cannot even respond to what he has said shows your not knowing what you are talking about about as big a douche as Jerkbomb who seems to have the same issues with you where neither one of you can say anything worth anything and you cannot even respond by showing a reason or pattern like he said you avoid answering the questions because if you attempt to answer them you whole argument fails

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:24 pm
by scarface99x
I think he might be saying why do those strategic areas always seem to be in other players areas vs. his "brothers" area.

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:05 am
by JOHNNYROCKET24
bumped back to first page again so it doesnt get missed

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:52 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
bumped back to first page again so it doesnt get missed...again

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 5:10 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
bumped to the first page

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 2:07 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
bump

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 3:30 pm
by Dancing Mustard
Why didn't you use one of your multis to do that?

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:40 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
bump

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:01 am
by Dancing Mustard
Now you're just being silly...

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:36 pm
by Aesop Jones
Bumping in support. Cheating aside, they should be booted for being general menaces. Everything that's wrong in CC can be summed up in this family.

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 12:15 pm
by Dancing Mustard
See, isn't it easier when you use one of your multis?

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 4:20 am
by JOHNNYROCKET24
bump

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 5:45 am
by Dancing Mustard
Oh... I thought you'd learned your lesson and were going to use your multis to do this with?

Why the step-backwards JR24? I didn't think you were the kind of guy to dwell in the past?

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 4:02 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
bump

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 6:09 pm
by Dancing Mustard
Do you ever feel alone JR?

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 11:55 am
by Snorri1234
This thread needs more conversation. Let's talk about why this person is obviously a cheater since he beat JR.

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 2:44 pm
by wicked
OK I've looked through a fair number of non-team games between Soloman and Risk Master2000 and don't see any where they seemed to team up in a secret alliance. If anyone has a specific game they'd like us to look at, please post that, but as of now I don't see anything worthy of a block. That coupled with the fact they no feedbacks for secret alliances, will lead me to CLEAR these two.

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 3:27 pm
by Soloman
wicked wrote:OK I've looked through a fair number of non-team games between Soloman and Risk Master2000 and don't see any where they seemed to team up in a secret alliance. If anyone has a specific game they'd like us to look at, please post that, but as of now I don't see anything worthy of a block. That coupled with the fact they no feedbacks for secret alliances, will lead me to CLEAR these two.

Thank you for the exoneration...

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 3:29 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
wicked wrote:OK I've looked through a fair number of non-team games between Soloman and Risk Master2000 and don't see any where they seemed to team up in a secret alliance. If anyone has a specific game they'd like us to look at, please post that, but as of now I don't see anything worthy of a block. That coupled with the fact they no feedbacks for secret alliances, will lead me to CLEAR these two.

I will supply you with the game numbers and details later tonight.

Re: soloman & risk master2000

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 7:55 pm
by Soloman
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
wicked wrote:OK I've looked through a fair number of non-team games between Soloman and Risk Master2000 and don't see any where they seemed to team up in a secret alliance. If anyone has a specific game they'd like us to look at, please post that, but as of now I don't see anything worthy of a block. That coupled with the fact they no feedbacks for secret alliances, will lead me to CLEAR these two.

I will supply you with the game numbers and details later tonight.
So you have a new list of games beside your crap you posted already wow I would love to see these ones since facts were shot through your argument on the last set...