Page 2 of 3
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:56 pm
by RiskTycoon
lol agreed!
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:10 pm
by TheBro
nagerous wrote::roll: "You are the worse kinda players"
Do you realise the irony in that statement, they are "players" i.e they are playing. Conquerclub isn't meant to be life, all it is is just people "playing" an online game and its meant to be for fun. When people become too competitive it ruins the concept of a game and just adds stress. Life is stressful enough without adding even more stress on a game website.
Yeah, when someone ruins a game for you, that is quite annoying, therefore sucking the fun out of it. If every game you played somebody suicided on you, I doubt you would be having fun either.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:22 pm
by nagerous
I get my fair share of idiots suiciding into me, but there are easy ways round that. Play more private games and tournament games. Nice use of hyperbole though and I'm sorry if you aren't having fun here.. I am.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:22 pm
by Herakilla
Blitzaholic wrote:but there is not a lot of fun if you are losing often, i think that is fair to say in any game or sport.
not always, my swim team rarely wins a conference meet (we win everything else though) since we are in the best conference but we have one heck of a good time at our meets, you can tell since we cheer WAY more than the other team
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:40 am
by TheBro
nagerous wrote:I get my fair share of idiots suiciding into me, but there are easy ways round that. Play more private games and tournament games. Nice use of hyperbole though and I'm sorry if you aren't having fun here.. I am.
I know, I was merely agreeing with Prankcall that the worst kind of players are the suiciders. I have plenty of fun because I prefer team games or 1v1, so suicides don't screw with the game.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:11 pm
by Kemmler
oVo wrote:I fear those players who still go out of their way for that extra wank.
lol elmer fwudd
i voted 3 as the majority did. I play 1 on 1 games cause they're fun and fast not cause they get you a higher win rate
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:52 pm
by KoE_Sirius
I voted 1.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:56 pm
by ParadiceCity9
Choice 3!
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:04 pm
by MeDeFe
Kemmler wrote:oVo wrote:I fear those players who still go out of their way for that extra wank.
lol elmer fwudd
i voted 3 as the majority did. I play 1 on 1 games cause they're fun and fast not cause they get you a higher win rate
I fear 1 vs. 1 games would lower my win rate of 39%... there's too much chance involved in 2-player games.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:20 pm
by Warsteiner
Used to be 3, has become 1 tho lately on my quest to general
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:22 pm
by djt5483
winning is fun
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:23 pm
by AAFitz
djt5483 wrote:winning is fun
playing is fun, winning is more fun
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:25 pm
by djt5483
AAFitz wrote:djt5483 wrote:winning is fun
playing is fun, winning is more fun
i play becuz its something to do when i get bored, winning is what makes it fun
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:32 pm
by Snorri1234
AAFitz wrote:djt5483 wrote:winning is fun
playing is fun, winning is more fun
As always, fitz is totally right.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:52 pm
by Risktaker17
I am at a point where I am so close to the crown I can feel its velvety goodness. I need that jewel encrested rank of glory!
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:52 pm
by Risktaker17
I am at a point where I am so close to the crown I can feel its velvety goodness. I need that jewel encrested rank of glory!
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:52 pm
by Risktaker17
AAFitz wrote:djt5483 wrote:winning is fun
playing is fun, winning is more fun
agreed! and sorry about the double post
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:53 pm
by KoE_Sirius
losing is the funnniest thing in the world...Winning is a drag sometimes..People take this game far to siriusly sometimes.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:54 pm
by Risktaker17
KoE_Sirius wrote:losing is the funnniest thing in the world...Winning is a drag sometimes..People take this game far to siriusly sometimes.
You wanna play a few hundred 1v1 games then
and letting me win
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:05 pm
by djt5483
Risktaker17 wrote:I am at a point where I am so close to the crown I can feel its velvety goodness. I need that jewel encrested rank of glory!
your really not that close u still need over 300 points
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:07 pm
by Warsteiner
relativly close
i want to be General Warsteiner!
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:03 pm
by mybike_yourface
i'm here for the valor.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:10 pm
by decoulombe
I'm out there just to have a fun, wreckless time (at least I had for the past two weeks) Soon, I may again change my mind and build my ranking again. Look at my profile. LOL
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:08 pm
by TheBro
Sometimes losing pisses me off. Like when my 134 armies lost to a 1, and he cashed in for 85 and ran the board.... I mean seriously, what are the chances?
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:31 pm
by Dr_Demento
points aren't important to me at all. Sometimes, I don't even play to win. When I used to play the board game, my goal was usually to make the game last as long as possible (which really pissed people off) Its harder to make a Risk game last 6 hours+ than it is to win.
I don't do that here, but I have experimented with other "goals"
I just wish I could find more people that used the in game chat. You know, you couldn't win the board game without a little wheelin and dealin.