Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:13 pm
Few things work well as democracy. This site is no different. There is one Owner, who is free to run this site as he wishes. That's the best way.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
WHO THINKS CONQUER CLUB SHOULD BE A DEMOCRACY
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37977
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:45 pm
well, if it's lacktatorship, can lack and the mods vote to ban wrestler1ump?
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:47 pm
Strife wrote:I think it should be a republic, which it kind of is.
agreed
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:48 pm
Blitzaholic wrote:Strife wrote:I think it should be a republic, which it kind of is.
agreed
then who are the republic dudes?
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:52 pm
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Spockers wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:hecter wrote:No, people are stupid.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:54 pm
the_fatty wrote:i think we should make an official poll (that lack should run) and pick the top 50 candidates to be mods, then narrow it down to a number like 15 or 10. sry lack, but its better if the members of CC chose the mods and not u by urself
No. Just no.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:55 pm
well, we could make an UNOFFICIAL republic of conquer club
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:31 pm
You can vote. With your dollars.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:33 pm
hecter wrote:No, people are stupid.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:44 pm
You forget just how few people surf the forums anyway. Is it 5%? So it wouldn't be representative anyway. Perhaps there could be votes of no confidence but I couldn't see it going any further than that.
Anyway, lack will do roughly what we want because, otherwise, he'll get bugger all money!
Anyway, lack will do roughly what we want because, otherwise, he'll get bugger all money!
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:03 pm
Naw, I say let lack remain prime minister and dictator for life. Who are we but mindless stategy players anyways. We bow down before you lack and remain your humble servants forever, (if not off with their heads)
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:02 pm
what do u meen by democracy how do u vote in cc
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:09 pm
i did see a luns for president signature, and it did make me think that perhaps there could be a players president, that could represent the players and talk to the management, much like a school president will talk to the school staff.
But to be honest, there isnt much of a need for it. Players can voice their opinion at will within the confines of the forum rules, and therefore a president isnt really needed. Also, the management tries to accomidate us very well under the current system, so a president, while perhaps fun to elect, isnt absolutely necessary.
It certainly would be a lot of work. Instead of people asking for things from the mods, the president would get pm'ed constantly. Hed then have to pm serious concerns to management.
Having a president for fun is probably Ok, but expecting the poor guy to actually do anything, might be unfair. We are all advocates for players. Some positive, some negative, some a nice combination of both.
So by all means go forward with the election, but I think the main goal should be for fun.
But to be honest, there isnt much of a need for it. Players can voice their opinion at will within the confines of the forum rules, and therefore a president isnt really needed. Also, the management tries to accomidate us very well under the current system, so a president, while perhaps fun to elect, isnt absolutely necessary.
It certainly would be a lot of work. Instead of people asking for things from the mods, the president would get pm'ed constantly. Hed then have to pm serious concerns to management.
Having a president for fun is probably Ok, but expecting the poor guy to actually do anything, might be unfair. We are all advocates for players. Some positive, some negative, some a nice combination of both.
So by all means go forward with the election, but I think the main goal should be for fun.