Conquer Club

UPDATE tournament table

Note:
- Refresh your browser, if you don't see the new update
- Date tournament table = date of this post

Grtz
MarVal

May I ask what 'Goals' are for?

Gilligan wrote:May I ask what 'Goals' are for?

If you have equal points in your group, then the goals will see who's first, second, third and so on.

Grtz
MarVal

y cant it be rounds won by? higher ranked players have disadvantage in the point sense.

MarVal wrote:

Gilligan wrote:May I ask what 'Goals' are for?

If you have equal points in your group, then the goals will see who's first, second, third and so on.

Grtz
MarVal

But how are they calculated?

See post 10 on page 2.

Grtz
MarVal

UPDATE tournament table

Note:
- Refresh your browser, if you don't see the new update
- Date tournament table = date of this post

Grtz
MarVal

edwinissweet wrote:y cant it be rounds won by? higher ranked players have disadvantage in the point sense.

And when it's number of rounds then the person who had better drop and better dice luck will have an advantage.
There isn't a completely fair way but I personally believe that the way points are used for goals is a good way.

I'll get back to you


Btw, first week is going well, everybody have joined their games and games are in progress.
Week 2 will start on Monday.

MarVal wrote:See post 10 on page 2.

Grtz
MarVal

Sorry, missed that part.

Gilligan wrote:

MarVal wrote:See post 10 on page 2.

Grtz
MarVal

Sorry, missed that part.

Don't worry, I missed it at the beginning also (and it is my thread, kinda ).

amazzony wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

MarVal wrote:See post 10 on page 2.

Grtz
MarVal

Sorry, missed that part.

Don't worry, I missed it at the beginning also (and it is my thread, kinda ).

Yeah, but I agree with edwinissweet... That's kind of a disadvantage to the higher ranks and an advantage to the lower.

Gilligan wrote:

amazzony wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

MarVal wrote:See post 10 on page 2.

Grtz
MarVal

Sorry, missed that part.

Don't worry, I missed it at the beginning also (and it is my thread, kinda ).

Yeah, but I agree with edwinissweet... That's kind of a disadvantage to the higher ranks and an advantage to the lower.

Well, as I said, when it's number of rounds then the person who had better drop and better dice luck will have an advantage.

Also, when there's a tie then the matches between those people are checked first and if these are 1:1 then goals come in. And I actually think that if you have kicked an higher rank ass then you deserve to be in the finals more than those who have kicked a cooks ass Though yes, I admit, it's not the best way but it seems better than rounds. Anyway, this system will be used in this tournament

started bad

japser_be wrote:started bad

It's just the 1st week out of 9

amazzony wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

amazzony wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

MarVal wrote:See post 10 on page 2.

Grtz
MarVal

Sorry, missed that part.

Don't worry, I missed it at the beginning also (and it is my thread, kinda ).

Yeah, but I agree with edwinissweet... That's kind of a disadvantage to the higher ranks and an advantage to the lower.

Well, as I said, when it's number of rounds then the person who had better drop and better dice luck will have an advantage.

Also, when there's a tie then the matches between those people are checked first and if these are 1:1 then goals come in. And I actually think that if you have kicked an higher rank ass then you deserve to be in the finals more than those who have kicked a cooks ass Though yes, I admit, it's not the best way but it seems better than rounds. Anyway, this system will be used in this tournament

I think its a good system, just like you said about cooks and the higher ranked.
In real life the best footballteams should win from the puppets/dwarfs footballteams with higher goals for....

So, thats no difference to me.

Grtz
MarVal

TO; Qualify, WC 2010 - CONMEBOL - Colombia vs Brazil

Brazil win the first one of Colombia in Round 5 on game 1373021 in the homestadium of Colombia.

Grtz
MarVal

UPDATE tournament table

Note:
- Refresh your browser, if you don't see the new update
- Date tournament table = date of this post

Grtz
MarVal

Does only the first place player advance to the next 2010 World Cup?

Gilligan wrote:Does only the first place player advance to the next 2010 World Cup?

See the tournament table on page 1. Scroll down and their you will see who's qualified for WC 2010 - Africa.

Grtz
MarVal

That's what I saw and why I'm asking. It says 1, 2, 3, and 4. Top 4 advance, but only number 1 gets the prize?

Gilligan wrote:That's what I saw and why I'm asking. It says 1, 2, 3, and 4. Top 4 advance, but only number 1 gets the prize?

4 (+maybe 1 more from intercontinental playoffs) will qualify to World Cup 2010 South Africa and only 1 of the 32 players will get the premium prize. That's why we are trying to point out that all the 6 qualifying rounds and 1 Final Tournament (WC 2010 South Africa) is all one tournament.
Not sure if it's more clear now :roll:

UPDATE tournament table

Note to Referee amazzony:

Godd (1373028) and lord voldemort (1373027) didn't post or PM the results of their games.

Note:
- Refresh your browser, if you don't see the new update
- Date tournament table = date of this post

Grtz
MarVal

MarVal wrote:Godd (1373028) and lord voldemort (1373027) didn't post or PM the results of their games.
Grtz
MarVal

I'll make a note in my previous PMs that it would be good if people post it, my bad

Cheers,
amzzony

1 of the 32 players will get the premium prize

screw the prize.. this is the closest i will ever get to winning a world cup

UPDATE tournament table

Note to Referee amazzony:

spinwizard (our own referee for CONCACAF) also didn't post or PM the result of his game (1373031).

Note:
- Refresh your browser, if you don't see the new update
- Date tournament table = date of this post

Grtz
MarVal