Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:07 pm
by Napoleon Ier
cawck mongler wrote:.

AmeriKKKa is even in control of Iraq, and they barely murder anyone.


Byno conceivable stretch of the imagination is that true.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:14 pm
by cawck mongler
Napoleon Ier wrote:Let me ask you, what are your references, where are you from?
Do you think you can use your cras insults to maintain your ludicrous sophistry?

I shouldn't even bother answering you really but here we go :

Poland and France killed more Nazis that America and Britain put together. They used RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS, so before you insut these places consider the balls it took to do this despite the huge massacres such as Oradour sur Glane et al.. USSR? It COLLAPSED, buddy! Poland is INDEPENDANT!

So please, go away, read, think, and when you reach are certain intellectual maturity we can discuss.


Uh, references? For what, you dumbshit? You don't just fucking ask for references out of no where faggot.

USA didn't do anything, and Britain was incompetant.

And the USSR collapsed because it had a shitty economy, not because of rebels in Eastern Europe.

And tell me how Germany managed to control the places it conquered AND fight a two front war against vastly superior numbers. If the resistance was so great, you'd think maybe they'd have broke away before the USSR came, especially since all the Germans were off fighting in Russia.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:16 pm
by Napoleon Ier
Germany just had exceptionally large numbers of troops.
as for your breakaways,look at the Warsaw uprisings

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:17 pm
by wicked
BTW cawck, since it takes a bit for the forum ban to kick in, continued flaming outside the flame wars will only add time onto your little "time-out".

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:20 pm
by Napoleon Ier
do I get banned for talking to him?

I probably should...I am encouraging him

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:33 pm
by wicked
No Napoleon, civil discussions are welcome in this thread. Cawck resorted to chidlish name calling and flaming, which he's already been warned about, hence his ban.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:37 pm
by cawck mongler
wicked wrote:No Napoleon, civil discussions are welcome in this thread. Cawck resorted to chidlish name calling and flaming, which he's already been warned about, hence his ban.


HEY FUCKER IVE NEVER BEEN WARNED ABOUT WUTEVER UR FUKKEN GETTING UR PUSSY SO TIGHT ABOUT AND INCASE U DONT NOTICE I ONLY POST HERE ONCE EVERY 3 FUKKEN WEEKS SO UNLESS U BAN ME 4 FUKKEN 5 MONTHS I DONT GIVE A f*ck

Also you are off topic and I have never seen a post by you that was on topic, hence you are a shitty moderator who supposedly bans people to take the flack off yourself.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:39 pm
by cawck mongler
Napoleon Ier wrote:Germany just had exceptionally large numbers of troops.
as for your breakaways,look at the Warsaw uprisings


Yeah, it had a large number of troops, hence it would've been able to keep everywhere under its thumb. And don't forget it had fucking Spain and Italy backing it up.

And don't just allude to something that fucking happened, I don't even know how the f*ck the 'Warsaw Uprisings' are supposed to strengthen your argument. Get this pigfucker, people everywhere are bitches and fucking uprise, not just in in fucking Warsaw.

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:42 pm
by Napoleon Ier
cawck mongler wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Germany just had exceptionally large numbers of troops.
as for your breakaways,look at the Warsaw uprisings


Yeah, it had a large number of troops, hence it would've been able to keep everywhere under its thumb. And don't forget it had fucking Spain and Italy backing it up.

And don't just allude to something that fucking happened, I don't even know how the f*ck the 'Warsaw Uprisings' are supposed to strengthen your argument. Get this pigfucker, people everywhere are bitches and fucking uprise, not just in in fucking Warsaw.


Spain? They sold the Germans tungsten. Thats pretty much it.

Are you in fact capable of constructing an argument, ordo you just repeat f*ck over and over till your opponant gets tired and leaves?

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:49 pm
by cawck mongler
Napoleon Ier wrote:
cawck mongler wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Germany just had exceptionally large numbers of troops.
as for your breakaways,look at the Warsaw uprisings


Yeah, it had a large number of troops, hence it would've been able to keep everywhere under its thumb. And don't forget it had fucking Spain and Italy backing it up.

And don't just allude to something that fucking happened, I don't even know how the f*ck the 'Warsaw Uprisings' are supposed to strengthen your argument. Get this pigfucker, people everywhere are bitches and fucking uprise, not just in in fucking Warsaw.


Spain? They sold the Germans tungsten. Thats pretty much it.

Are you in fact capable of constructing an argument, ordo you just repeat f*ck over and over till your opponant gets tired and leaves?


Learn history dumbshit, Spain was fascist and would've allied with Germany if they ever started winning.

But I guess you don't learn that in fucking Junior High do you? Get the f*ck off the internet and stop arguing about shit you don't even know, you've never once defended a thing you've said and only switch your point to something even stupider each time I expose your retarded bullshit.

But yeah, I guess you had to suck wickeds cock and get her to ban me (which she can't do because she's fucking retarded), I win fucker, now get lost.