Page 2 of 13
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:49 pm
by soundout9
mr. incrediball wrote:soundout9 wrote:mr. incrediball wrote:soundout9 wrote: LOL thats cool well im gonna try and make this one real. either one of you in or not...
do you own a ps3? screw ps3 it sux
I was about to join before you said that...
Well you can still hate ps3 just make fun of the people who have one and join this clan
i do have a ps3... Dammit i wanna call you an idiot but i have to be nice, be good, behave...
Oooo my srry well thats just my opoinion then you can make fun of me for likeing the 360
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:56 pm
by Minister Masket
soundout9 wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:If you bought the extra addons to make the xbox 360 have everything that the ps3 has it would cost $850 for the xbox360. it still wouldn't have as good of graphics.
But ps3 still has like no games and all it has is blue-ray.....and i could care less about hd movies sooooooo
Ok, thats it.
Time to squash your ideas about making a clan and turn this thread into the good old "Next-Gen Debate" topic. What fun.
PS3 has no games? A laughable statement. If it had no games, there would be no launch. I'm assuming you meant decent games, in which case, you're still a fool. Resistance, Motorstorm and Warhawk are all great games on the PS3 ATM.
Care to bite back?
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:27 pm
by soundout9
Minister Masket wrote:soundout9 wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:If you bought the extra addons to make the xbox 360 have everything that the ps3 has it would cost $850 for the xbox360. it still wouldn't have as good of graphics.
But ps3 still has like no games and all it has is blue-ray.....and i could care less about hd movies sooooooo
Ok, thats it.
Time to squash your ideas about making a clan and turn this thread into the good old "Next-Gen Debate" topic. What fun.
PS3 has no games? A laughable statement. If it had no games, there would be no launch. I'm assuming you meant decent games, in which case, you're still a fool. Resistance, Motorstorm and Warhawk are all great games on the PS3 ATM.
Care to bite back?
Resistance sux its a want to be gears of war. moterstorm and warhawk i dont even know what they are. Alright now im willing to stop all this madness about what gaming console is the best because it would go on forever. So are you willing to join this clan. Its for all next-gen gaming lovers. The point of this clan is for gamers that play cc as well as any conole to play games together and chat about what they like best about their system. I even got a good idea
we could have a clan tourney to decide which system is the best 360 v. ps3 v. wii. NOW GO RECRUIT
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:36 pm
by soundout9
Minister Masket wrote:soundout9 wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:If you bought the extra addons to make the xbox 360 have everything that the ps3 has it would cost $850 for the xbox360. it still wouldn't have as good of graphics.
But ps3 still has like no games and all it has is blue-ray.....and i could care less about hd movies sooooooo
Ok, thats it.
Time to squash your ideas about making a clan and turn this thread into the good old "Next-Gen Debate" topic. What fun.
PS3 has no games? A laughable statement. If it had no games, there would be no launch. I'm assuming you meant decent games, in which case, you're still a fool. Resistance, Motorstorm and Warhawk are all great games on the PS3 ATM.
Care to bite back?
you never responed back...haha i win lol j/k um i need someone to join this clan that can make sigs.!
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:25 am
by Skittles!
Please think this as literally true when I say GO DIE!
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:46 am
by Iliad
Skittles! wrote:Please think this as literally true when I say GO DIE!
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:35 am
by reverend_kyle
soundout9 wrote:Minister Masket wrote:soundout9 wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:If you bought the extra addons to make the xbox 360 have everything that the ps3 has it would cost $850 for the xbox360. it still wouldn't have as good of graphics.
But ps3 still has like no games and all it has is blue-ray.....and i could care less about hd movies sooooooo
Ok, thats it.
Time to squash your ideas about making a clan and turn this thread into the good old "Next-Gen Debate" topic. What fun.
PS3 has no games? A laughable statement. If it had no games, there would be no launch. I'm assuming you meant decent games, in which case, you're still a fool. Resistance, Motorstorm and Warhawk are all great games on the PS3 ATM.
Care to bite back?
Resistance sux its a want to be gears of war. moterstorm and warhawk i dont even know what they are. Alright now im willing to stop all this madness about what gaming console is the best because it would go on forever. So are you willing to join this clan. Its for all next-gen gaming lovers. The point of this clan is for gamers that play cc as well as any conole to play games together and chat about what they like best about their system. I even got a good idea
we could have a clan tourney to decide which system is the best 360 v. ps3 v. wii. NOW GO RECRUIT
Resistance does indeed suck, motorstorm and warhawk are indeed great games. Another great game is heavenly sword, and those are all exclusively for the ps3, you haven't heard of them because you've got your head up you 360's ass too long. As for my $850 statistic, ok the hd dvd drive for a 360 costs 180 so without that it is still 670$ to add on everything the ps3 has to the 360 which is more expensive.
Also, the 360 has climaxed with Halo 3. Still to come with the ps3, Ratchet and Clank(a new one), metal gear solid, and another game that I don't remember the name of but it looks fucking sweet.
Oh and another thing the 360 doesn't have and will never have is motion sensor technology, and it costs $70 more.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:14 am
by Wisse
in for Wii! (ps3 isn't that bad, but xbox is really bad...)
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:03 pm
by kalishnikov
reverend_kyle wrote:If you bought the extra addons to make the xbox 360 have everything that the ps3 has it would cost $850 for the xbox360. it still wouldn't have as good of graphics.
So true. Not to mention X-Box has a 17% failure rate. Almost 2 of every 10 stop working... And if you want to get into to technical data, we could argue the Cell Processor over any MS SKU any day on sheer processing power alone, not to mention frame-rate issues, backwards compatibility and a whole host of other things. 2008 is going to change some people's opinions on the whole system war thing, me thinks.
I'm just playing devil's advocate here, I own a PS 3 but I'm far from a fanboy and refuse to prolong the console war. A gamer is a gamer in my opinion, regardless of what you play on. I just can't wait for the days of cross-console play, when we all meet on the same online battlefield.
But I have noticed that it's always an X-Box fan, who doesn't own a Playstation 3, that's doing the trash talking.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:53 pm
by soundout9
kalishnikov wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:If you bought the extra addons to make the xbox 360 have everything that the ps3 has it would cost $850 for the xbox360. it still wouldn't have as good of graphics.
So true. Not to mention X-Box has a 17% failure rate. Almost 2 of every 10 stop working... And if you want to get into to technical data, we could argue the Cell Processor over any MS SKU any day on sheer processing power alone, not to mention frame-rate issues, backwards compatibility and a whole host of other things. 2008 is going to change some people's opinions on the whole system war thing, me thinks.
I'm just playing devil's advocate here, I own a PS 3 but I'm far from a fanboy and refuse to prolong the console war. A gamer is a gamer in my opinion, regardless of what you play on. I just can't wait for the days of cross-console play, when we all meet on the same online battlefield.
But I have noticed that it's always an X-Box fan, who doesn't own a Playstation 3, that's doing the trash talking.
yes i would know x-box has a 17% falure rate....my has had the rings of death lol. but i got it fixed so it really doesnt matter. and
kalishnikov wrote:A gamer is a gamer in my opinion, regardless of what you play on. I just can't wait for the days of cross-console play, when we all meet on the same online battlefield.
i tottaly agree with that
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:54 pm
by soundout9
I may be a 360 lover but i dont have a 360 hat
so i got second best wii hat
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:41 am
by soundout9
bump
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:37 am
by soundout9
soundout9 wrote:bump
Bump again
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:04 pm
by The Weird One
*coughs*
so. . .you automatically exclude the pc from "next gen gaming" even though DX10 will be able to blow any of those consoles out of the sky as far as graphics are concerned. Please explain your reasoning
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:10 pm
by Fircoal
The Weird One wrote:*coughs*
so. . .you automatically exclude the pc from "next gen gaming" even though DX10 will be able to blow any of those consoles out of the sky as far as graphics are concerned. Please explain your reasoning
so that's only graphics, and if you count pcs, then what about all computers, and handhelds too. And all stuff like that. >.<
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:28 pm
by soundout9
Fircoal wrote:The Weird One wrote:*coughs*
so. . .you automatically exclude the pc from "next gen gaming" even though DX10 will be able to blow any of those consoles out of the sky as far as graphics are concerned. Please explain your reasoning
so that's only graphics, and if you count pcs, then what about all computers, and handhelds too. And all stuff like that. >.<
Im talking concole wars. if i included the pc that would be um....everyone in here could join cause well you kinda gotta have one to be here. (dont get technical with me i know you can internet on psp, wii, ps3...ect) And i hate handhelds i have a psp and im dissipointed in it.
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:00 pm
by The Weird One
well, if you don't mean pc's, then rename the thread. pc's WILL be playing a major role in next gen gaming. if you disagree, explain why.
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:10 pm
by soundout9
The Weird One wrote:well, if you don't mean pc's, then rename the thread. pc's WILL be playing a major role in next gen gaming. if you disagree, explain why.
Fine whatever pc lovers can join too.....
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:13 pm
by The Weird One
I wasn't asking to join. I was just asking about your reasoning for excluding a computer from this group.
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:17 pm
by soundout9
The Weird One wrote:I wasn't asking to join. I was just asking about your reasoning for excluding a computer from this group.
I know i was just saying. My reason would be its not a console. When you think of next-gen gameing you dont think of the computer.
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:20 pm
by The Weird One
YOU might not, but 99% of my gaming is done on a computer. therefore, I think of computers for gaming (many people might not have a computer with the potential for next gen gaming without upgrades but the potential still exists)
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:21 pm
by soundout9
The Weird One wrote:YOU might not, but 99% of my gaming is done on a computer. therefore, I think of computers for gaming (many people might not have a computer with the potential for next gen gaming without upgrades but the potential still exists)
I knwo what your saying i used to game only on the computer. but not next gen gameing
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:24 pm
by The Weird One
soundout9 wrote:The Weird One wrote:YOU might not, but 99% of my gaming is done on a computer. therefore, I think of computers for gaming (many people might not have a computer with the potential for next gen gaming without upgrades but the potential still exists)
I knwo what your saying i used to game only on the computer.
but not next gen gameing
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:55 pm
by soundout9
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:20 am
by The Weird One
i dunno. . .maybe peoples iz just tired of all of the attempted clans that get a few pages in and then vanish because of lack of interest
