Conquer Club

Ruben Cassar wrote:I don't like the way the medals are awarded. The way they are awarded now it doesn't equate to skill. If a player plays a lot of games he's bound to get the medals in the end.

Would it be better if they were awarded on win percentage? For example for doubles 50% wins - bronze, 60% wins - silver, 70% wins - gold. Of course if a player achieves a medal and then goes below the percentage this should not be removed and there should be a criteria of say playing 100 games in a specific setting.

I believe part of the whole idea is to encourage more game-playing, particularly with new people and different maps.

BUT, the levels are pretty low. Maybe a separate structur could be employed for percentages.

One thing I would like to see is some kind of "reigning champion" for each map and/or style. Percentage could be a component, though to keep a newbie who wins 1 game (and then gets 100%) from "winning" the award, I would set a minimum number of games. Say, maybe 100? and then the percentage.

I also think, unlike the overall conquerer, this perhaps(???) should NOT be a "kept" title ... but should be a changeable one, like the current conquer. The reason is just plain and simply space. (both on individual's profiles, within the database, etc.)

HOWEVER, I would like to see an added "around the maps" overall conquerer title for the person who has the greatest percentage wins on ALL the boards, with the stipulation that there be a minimum number of games played with unique opponents. (perhaps also a cap on the number of times a win against one person can count ... though that might be a programming nightmare). THIS one would be permanent, but the medal would be "notated" with the number of maps available at the time of the award AND the percentage win and point total of the person (points won't factor into the award, but will be a point of interest).

The reason for doing percentage instead of points is a combination of your argument above (a better assessment, as long as there is a baseline minimum number of games required) AND the fact that a percentage would probably (????) be easier to figure ... for everyone. Points often have more to do with WHO you play than the number of times you win.

ParadiceCity9 wrote:I think the win percentage thing should be

bronze - 40%
silver - 55%
gold - 70%

Bad idea.

I don't play 1v1 games otherwise I'd have a high win perecentage. I normally play a lot of 5-8 player games meaning my win percentage will be low. This medal would encourage people to play only 1v1 against noobs.

How about medals for Escalating, Flat Rate and No Cards achievements? Base on the number of wins with each type of game.
Would show which players are specialist with each kind of cards...

Percentage wins are the worst idea - it just leaves for people who play 1v1 only and noob bash on crap players. Basically it's awarding those who lack skill. Hm... I wonder what type of player would suggest having medals based on win% .

happy2seeyou wrote:

jiminski wrote:

happy2seeyou wrote:
I like these.

Medal for Well Rounded 'Players'

hahahahaha. Too bad they don't get it.

I do

if any player ever hit 3000 score bronze, 4000 score silver, 5000 score gold, even if there score is below these now, at least it shows that they were there at one time

also, 1000 total wins bronze, 2,500 total wins silver, 5000 total wins, gold

winner of a battle royal bronze, winner of 3 silver, winner of 5, gold

fog of war, winner of 20 bronze, winner of 100 silver, winner of 400 gold just like all the others


these would be my 4 suggestions to add

I don't know if anyone wants to dig it up, but I had a bunch of ideas in my old topic that could be tweaked to fit in with the current medals.

i love to reach some hard Achivements:D CC keep getting better and better. And i think it will be even better with this:)

MrBenn wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:World Conquerer <Win on over 50 different maps>no. games can be staged
Beat The Best <Beat Someone When They Have The Conquerer Rank>no. games can be staged
Conquerer <Achieve Conquerer Rank In Your Lifetime>no. games can be stagedplayers already been busted that acheived this

To be fair, any games could be staged, but that shouldn't be a reason to not have a medal for something. Perhaps we should have a "Cheaters Medal" for anyone who gets busted? If it was to replace all your other medals (i.e. if you 25 medals but got busted, you'd be stripped of your decorations and given the "Cheaters Medal") - that would be an incentive NOT to cheat?

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Friend In Me <Win 100 Team Games with the Same Partner(s)> good idea. too easy. make it 500

How about changing this one to: "Friend in me <Win 100 team games with different partners>"?

I'm sure I read somewhere about a 'Medal of Dishonour'... this would bascially be my cheats meadal mentioned above...

if any player ever hit 3000 score bronze, 4000 score silver, 5000 score gold, even if there score is below these now, at least it shows that they were there at one time

also, 1000 total wins bronze, 2,500 total wins silver, 5000 total wins, gold

winner of a battle royal bronze, winner of 3 silver, winner of 5, gold

posts 60 bronze, 300 silver, 1000 gold

fog of war, winner of 20 bronze, winner of 100 silver, winner of 400 gold just like all the others


these would be my 5 suggestions to add








also, how bout not only bronze 20, silver, 100, gold 400, but add platinum and diamond

bronze 20 wins
silver 100 wins
gold 300 wins
platinum 500 wins
diamond 1000 wins

I think many would luv diamond status

Blitzaholic wrote:if any player ever hit 3000 score bronze, 4000 score silver, 5000 score gold, even if there score is below these now, at least it shows that they were there at one time

also, 1000 total wins bronze, 2,500 total wins silver, 5000 total wins, gold

winner of a battle royal bronze, winner of 3 silver, winner of 5, gold

posts 60 bronze, 300 silver, 1000 gold

fog of war, winner of 20 bronze, winner of 100 silver, winner of 400 gold just like all the others


these would be my 5 suggestions to add








also, how bout not only bronze 20, silver, 100, gold 400, but add platinum and diamond

bronze 20 wins
silver 100 wins
gold 300 wins
platinum 500 wins
diamond 1000 wins

I think many would luv diamond status

I like the idea of a static score award, and those numbers sound good. The wins and battle royal are good ideas too. I think the numbers for the post count awards are low. They should be more on the side of 150, 500, 1500. Also, platinum would be a good idea, but how about a dynamic, best current ranking in the category.

Can someone post a concise list of the new suggestions? Just a short list with the gameplay settings and the requirements for each level? The thread is getting a little long, and it is hard to see what has been suggested already.

lancehoch wrote:Can someone post a concise list of the new suggestions? Just a short list with the gameplay settings and the requirements for each level? The thread is getting a little long, and it is hard to see what has been suggested already.

They're in the second post, along with these ideas:
-medal for score (that's what the scoreboard is for) [Blitz]
-medal for wins (it's in your profile already) [JR24, Blitz]
-win percentage (also in profile) [JR24]
(somebody's hunting for medals)

-battle royale [Blitz]
-posts [Androidz]
-wins on a specific map (qwert)
-achievements we already have, but for specific maps (max is gr8)

And ideas for adding to the system, either with a special medal for the top performer, or (also) with two additional stages of medals. But most importantly:

lackattack wrote:All the medals based on Game Type are mutually-exclusive and balance each other out.

So I doubt we'll see anything from above save posts and additional medal stages.

I'd like to see a bit more breakdown on the medals page.

i.e. where it says 6,000-odd medals have been won on standard, how many have achieved bronze, how many silver and how many gold.

Obviously some players (not me ) will already be contributing 3 to the total shown.

qwert wrote:

by ParadiceCity9 on Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:32 pm

I think the win percentage thing should be

bronze - 40%
silver - 55%
gold - 70%

I will need to know more description,what will hepend when player lost hes percentage,did he lost medal or what?

No he still has the medal since he got that percentage at a time.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:1) total wins
1,000-bronze- 2,00-silver- 3,000 -gold, 5000 platinum, 10,000 diamond

2) winning percentage ( 1,000 game minimum )
50-60% bronze
61-70% silver
71-75%- gold
76-80% platinum
81% plus diamond


3) win streak is another good one but this can be staged

good ideas jr, i tweaked it some and thinking more reasonable

Sorry for my absence. I updated the list in the second post with the most relevant suggestions. I did not include various tournament colors because they won't be done (that's why there are Roman Numerals), and I also excluded any post count medals because they'll probably just increase spamming thus adding more work for the mods.

Battle Royale is on the list.

qwert, I didn't include your Victory Achievement medal because it seemed to be two different suggestions in one, and adding map specific medals will probably just dilute the value of the medals (hence why lack added the cross-map medal).

Also, from what I can tell, these medals are tied to game types, and not scores, so why should there be a medal for reaching Conquerer?

Night Strike wrote:Official List
*Each title is linked to the post where it was proposed.

• Fog of War Achievement
• Platinum Medal
• Tournament Champion
• Total Wins
• Win Percentage
• Unique Map Achievement
• Endurance
• Cards Achievement
• Score Plateau
• Battle Royal Recognition
• Platinum & Diamond Medal Levels
• Split Medals page to list each level separately
• Length of Activity on Site
• Freestyle Achievement

is any of this being discussed with the admins?

New medal/Achivements/Ranks.

There should be a Medal Of Honour obliviosly.

And also a Rank/Achivement/Medal which show that your the best of your country or continent. Now its just world based.

Night Strike wrote:Official List
*Each title is linked to the post where it was proposed.

• Fog of War Achievement
• Platinum Medal
• Tournament Champion
• Total Wins
• Win Percentage
• Unique Map Achievement
• Endurance
• Cards Achievement
• Score Plateau
• Battle Royal Recognition
• Platinum & Diamond Medal Levels
• Split Medals page to list each level separately
• Length of Activity on Site
• Freestyle Achievement
• Consecutive Victories

Individual Map, Style achievements:

These were suggested in another forum. It would mean a LOT of individual medals. (currently there are over 80 maps, 6 game "types", plus 2 playing modes (freestyle/seq), 2 speeds, 3 card types, etc. That quickly becomes just too, too many!


I would like to see:
Freestyle and Sequential.... perhaps to replace "Standard" achievement, if necessary? Why? These require two very distinct types of play and attract distinct groups of players. Some do "crossover", but they should be separated.

Classic map achievement (since this is the most popular map)
Perhaps NO Card/Flat/Escalating medals
Perhaps Fog of War if the above included ... fro completeness, as suggested
Higher medal levels (Platinum, Diamond, Emerald, etc.)
I prefer "endurance" ... a consolation prize for playing a lot of games, rather than a "time in site" badge, but could see both.


I definitely do NOT like:
Win percentage (manipulatable and overall wins is more meaningful)
Total wins or Score plateau (prefer these as a badge or badges that change)


Prefer Trophies and/or Badges for the following, not medals
The Highest achiever medal (for each category) I like this, but it should be a trophy, not a medal. AND that you achieved this should be recorded in your profile somehow -- either as a badge or a seperate medal (with the number of each inside the medal and then a clickable explanation of which trophies were won in the profile)

Tournament champion
Conquerer achiever (the crown is temporary, this would be permanent)
Battle Royal winner


I would like to see floating trophies or badges for the top Classic winner, top Freestyle, Top Classic map players and perhaps top overall map player (for the one with the best average across all the maps) or overall CC player (for the top average across all the maps and styles ... this would not necesarily be the same as the Conquerer, the highest scorer, because you can get Conquerer by winning at only certain maps and styles).

AND, though it was not included above, I really liked the idea of recording each person's highest score in a badge, with different colors for the top individuals ( I believe it was Gold for the top 10 scores, Silver for the top 50 and Either bronze for the top 100 and clear/white for the rest OR just bronze for everyone past 50).


Also not included, I really think we need an award for folks who keep playing all the maps, including new ones. That is, right now, once you have won 5 times at 60 maps, there is nothing else left. What about one that not only required you to win at all the playable maps (anything deleted, such as Midkermia was for awhile, will be omitted, of course), but to KEEP winning to keep that badge. That not only encourages folks to play a variety of maps, but encourages them to keep playing and to try the newer maps.

it would be cool to get medals or badges in game...kinda like Halo 3...you could be very unique with them...and it would be cool to go back and look at your past games to see what type of medals or badges you got for that game...maybe even have it when you win enough of these "one time" medals or badges you get a permanent one

any news abouth medal sugestion?

I need new medals. I had all 27 for awhile now.

I would like something done about getting more medals we can work towards getting. 5 for fog , 5 for tournament victories, 5 for seq ,5 for freestyle 5 for chained,unlimited and adjacent wins and same for esc,flat rate and no spoils.