Moderator: Community Team


jonesthecurl wrote:Shawshank.
The Life Acquatic.
Star Wars.
rdsrds2120 wrote:I agree with The Star Wars movies, and the LOTR series. I also (literally) fell asleep.
-rd
Woodruff wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:Shawshank.
The Life Acquatic.
Star Wars.
You, sir, are a dangerous lunatic.
(Although I've never heard of "The Life Aquatic".)
nagerous wrote:All the films mentioned in this thread are quality.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
ManBungalow wrote:And I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Inception yet. I enjoyed it, but it's not quite as orgasmic as some would have you believe.
ManBungalow wrote:Star Wars/A New Hope
ManBungalow wrote:And I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Inception yet. I enjoyed it, but it's not quite as orgasmic as some would have you believe.
IcePack wrote:1, 2, and 3. The Hunger Games.
wtf was the hype about?
DirtyDishSoap wrote:Another one for example is Avatar. It's a movie about big blue indians. Woo hoo...

Sniper08 wrote:star wars the orginal trilogy is over rated imo , dont get me wrong they are still great movies(well VI is ok) but they arent what ppl make them out to be . on the flip side the prequels are under rated , they arent bad movies just ppl had such vivid memories of the orginals they felt the prequels let them down.
john9blue wrote:citizen kane.
WHOA THERE'S A TWIST AT THE END HOLY SHIT BEST MOVIE EVER
this is the part where you all start hating on me for being a philistine
In order to appreciate that you'd have to see a lot of movies that came before it. The cinematography was incredibly innovative: deep focus shots where things are going on in both the foreground, midground, and background all at once. The low-angle shots involved new ways of building sets. They introduced effects to make crowds look bigger and buildings look grander. The compositions and shading of the shots are quite beautiful.
Welles invented the L-cut: the edits for a scene would change the soundtrack a few frames ahead of the visual. They do that all the time today, and when you see old movies that don't do that the cut feels abrupt and jarring.
Finally, there's the way the film was produced. They gave Welles an unheard of amount of creative control, so he got to make the movie he wanted to make. It's as if he made an indie film on a big studio budget, perhaps the only time in history that has ever really happened. That gave Welles the freedom to shoot a controversial script (Kane is a thinly disguised version of William Randolph Hearst, who tried to get the movie shut down or destroyed) using novel filmmaking techniques.
But I can hear you saying, "Why do I care?" and in fact, you really don't. All of this is for film buffs, who repeatedly call it the Greatest Movie of All Time. For the rest of us, all of these technical tricks have been done over and over and over, and "it was the first!" rings rather hollow.
Get the version of the film with Roger Ebert's commentary and you'll find out why the critics all go ga-ga over the movie. Beyond that, though, it's just a movie. A pretty good story, with some nice visuals and some great acting, but just a movie.
Sniper08 wrote:star wars the orginal trilogy is over rated imo , dont get me wrong they are still great movies(well VI is ok) but they arent what ppl make them out to be . on the flip side the prequels are under rated , they arent bad movies just ppl had such vivid memories of the orginals they felt the prequels let them down.
Symmetry wrote:Sniper08 wrote:star wars the orginal trilogy is over rated imo , dont get me wrong they are still great movies(well VI is ok) but they arent what ppl make them out to be . on the flip side the prequels are under rated , they arent bad movies just ppl had such vivid memories of the orginals they felt the prequels let them down.
Nah, episode 1 was terrible.
Maugena wrote:Napoleon Dynamite.
It was not that funny.
Maugena wrote:Napoleon Dynamite.
It was not that funny.
Army of GOD wrote:Napoleon Dynamite is funny f*ck all of you