Conquer Club

Wisse wrote:

Telvannia wrote:could we also have a option to hide some people signitures aswell
not that im thinking of anyone in particular

not thinking of Ronaldinho signature? impossible!

Ronaldinho signiture?
no......no.....no......
yes

Too many teeth in this thread... move on

haha, man, this is like the 7th thread koolbaks made about me...


Now I know how dugcarr1 feels.. haha!


Oh and this is planned for php3 software. We learned this back when patroclus was bitching about it.

I only counted 2....hmmmmmmmm

Well, if you count you following me in every thread totally unrelated, I count 7. Theres the football one in the romper room theres the 2 you created, my one on how great my clan is.. and a few more.

I think theres a dozen or more sarcastic-boy...LOL!!! TIIIIIIIIIIILT!!!!

*sqeezed in a power nap so am feeling better*

It seems people aren't using their greasemonkey to its fullest extent.

Php User Hide - Removes the contents of unwanted people's posts. Just add a name to your personal ban list and that person's posts are blank on that computer.
Sig purger - goodbye people's signatures.

Plenty of other stuff too. Remove forum stretch, user notes, remove images from sigs, etc.

the only thing is i have a mac and those stuff doesn't work on my computer

So do I. What about with Mac firefox? I'm getting an IMac for Chrismas and would put it on there.

Some of us choose not to use it at all.......

I am not going to rework the 6 computers I use (browsers, downloads, etc) for a game.

hawkeye wrote:So do I. What about with Mac firefox? I'm getting an IMac for Chrismas and would put it on there.

it didn't work, or must i put it on the firefox map? its not clear to me

please enable this 1 lack

Actually It depends in suggestions you would get annoyed beause people would be talking to an ivisible person

But in some cases

Wow, I just tried that signature purger.. it works great!

And like Andy said, I'd rather program the main CC website and let phpBB take care of forum improvements.

Pm blocker to block TOOLS from pming you like we have ignore in game chat & mute in Gabby chat. That way you can block TOOLS from sending you pm's & they would bounce back at them????

I would LOVE this!

But, this is a forum problem and Lack has said he doesnt want to hack the forum software. Best bet would be to wait until the new phpbb upgrade comes out, then see if this comes with it.

well, it wouldnt be hard to just create a new account and spam you with a new name.. mayne make it so only people on your friend's list can pm you.. but that would be most unfortunate as well... my my, what a conundrum

AK_iceman wrote:I would LOVE this!

But, this is a forum problem and Lack has said he doesnt want to hack the forum software. Best bet would be to wait until the new phpbb upgrade comes out, then see if this comes with it.

i agree stop the spam

If you put somebody on your ignore list while you're currently in a game with them, you should still be able to read the game chat of that person from that game. Otherwise they could be asking for alliances, or teaming up essentially secretly.

either that or have an option asking about blocking text....i think it's an alright idea, not that high of a priority tho, fill out the form!

To hell with the form, I know it's not important, but it still would be nice. I covered the whole form in my 2 sentences.

fill out the form....


the boot-licking mods here have a love affair with rules.

The whole idea behind hiding the chat was because people DIDN'T want to read the chat. Now you want to reverse that? What you can do, take them off your ignore list, see if they added anything, add them back on.


--Andy

i think he means it can be disabled for active games with the person you are in

Yeah, I understand that. It seems sort of counter to the idea originally behind it.

Perhaps a checkbox could be scripted to enable/disable the 'ignore feature'...somewhere next to the game chat. If something like this was created...perhaps make it so if you uncheck it, and forget to check it before leaving the game, it just checks back automatically.

But I'm not sure the suggestion is really needed, or at least of any priority just yet.


--Andy