Well, if you count you following me in every thread totally unrelated, I count 7. Theres the football one in the romper room theres the 2 you created, my one on how great my clan is.. and a few more.
It seems people aren't using their greasemonkey to its fullest extent.
Php User Hide - Removes the contents of unwanted people's posts. Just add a name to your personal ban list and that person's posts are blank on that computer.
Sig purger - goodbye people's signatures.
Pm blocker to block TOOLS from pming you like we have ignore in game chat & mute in Gabby chat. That way you can block TOOLS from sending you pm's & they would bounce back at them????
But, this is a forum problem and Lack has said he doesnt want to hack the forum software. Best bet would be to wait until the new phpbb upgrade comes out, then see if this comes with it.
well, it wouldnt be hard to just create a new account and spam you with a new name.. mayne make it so only people on your friend's list can pm you.. but that would be most unfortunate as well... my my, what a conundrum
But, this is a forum problem and Lack has said he doesnt want to hack the forum software. Best bet would be to wait until the new phpbb upgrade comes out, then see if this comes with it.
If you put somebody on your ignore list while you're currently in a game with them, you should still be able to read the game chat of that person from that game. Otherwise they could be asking for alliances, or teaming up essentially secretly.
The whole idea behind hiding the chat was because people DIDN'T want to read the chat. Now you want to reverse that? What you can do, take them off your ignore list, see if they added anything, add them back on.
Yeah, I understand that. It seems sort of counter to the idea originally behind it.
Perhaps a checkbox could be scripted to enable/disable the 'ignore feature'...somewhere next to the game chat. If something like this was created...perhaps make it so if you uncheck it, and forget to check it before leaving the game, it just checks back automatically.
But I'm not sure the suggestion is really needed, or at least of any priority just yet.