Conquer Club

Posted: **Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:29 pm**

blackgoblin wrote:See game 9670030 Blitz on a one to one in a real game of Risk failed to beat a Corp. Blitz has at least seen the light. Playing freestyle,quads,triples, and doubles gives a massive advantage. If they want to play their settings fine but dont think it is fair to compare score with those that dont. This new guy has an edge - good luck to him/her. Playing fast with better equipment means nothing... When or if this account starts playing real skill games their score will drop to normal.

That's some pretty deep insight on the workings of CC from someone who signed up 5 days ago. :-s

Congrats mc05025 =D>

Posted: **Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:35 pm**

blackgoblin wrote:So mc05025 has a fast computer and plays Free style. So what.
He/She is just farming points against slower machines/software. No one gets that high that fast without cheating. Blitz is playing single games on sequential and o look points dropping lol.

Only half his games are played freestyle... and that's 24 hour freestyle. Speed freestyle is all about being lightning fast. And 8 player games are harder to win than 1v1s. Mc proved he can win the majority of his games.

It's not cheating. :lol:

Posted: **Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:58 pm**

blackgoblin wrote:See game 9670030 Blitz on a one to one in a real game of Risk failed to beat a Corp. Blitz has at least seen the light. Playing freestyle,quads,triples, and doubles gives a massive advantage. If they want to play their settings fine but dont think it is fair to compare score with those that dont. This new guy has an edge - good luck to him/her. Playing fast with better equipment means nothing... When or if this account starts playing real skill games their score will drop to normal.

You are wrong , he is a very good sequential singles player and on those settings computer speed means nothing. I dont like the guy and he certainly isn't as good as he thinks he is but make no mistake he knows how to play.

Posted: **Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:02 pm**

comic boy wrote:I dont like the guy...

Me neither. Kira was way smarter than L.

Posted: **Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:48 pm**

comic boy wrote:
You are wrong , he is a very good sequential singles player and on those settings computer speed means nothing. I dont like the guy and he certainly isn't as good as he thinks he is but make no mistake he knows how to play.

I 'm flattered

.
I do not know how good I am because people do not point my mistakes and I have to find them alone (if I can) :cry:

P.S. Yea but Kira playing more dirty than me :twisted:

Posted: **Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:51 pm**

mc05025 wrote:
comic boy wrote:
You are wrong , he is a very good sequential singles player and on those settings computer speed means nothing. I dont like the guy and he certainly isn't as good as he thinks he is but make no mistake he knows how to play.

I 'm flattered .
I do not know how good I am because people do not point my mistakes and I have to find them alone (if I can)

P.S. Yea but Kira playing more dirty than me

All i got to say is hes number 1 congrats

Posted: **Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:49 am**

He's numbr one so congrats???? that's what they said about Hitler...all I gotta say is bullshiite...no-one isw that good in that few games...I'm just trailer trash but unless there ALL against dropkickis, then I smell a rat...NO GOD NO MASTER!!! ...don't believe the hype... :twisted:

Posted: **Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:55 am**

Dukasaur wrote:
assassin07 wrote:Congrats [player]mc05025[/player]

Very impressive!

Not just that he did it in so few games, but also because looking through them, you don't see an endless row of quads games on the same map over and over. A heavy emphasis on freestyle sure, and a heavy emphasis on King's Court, but overall he has played a broad range of maps, a broad range of settings, and more than half are solo efforts. I'm genuinely impressed.

27 of 267 were KC. So about 11 percent. Certainly it shows he wasn't relying too heavily on any one map.

But only 52 percent in 267 games (roughly 240 or 250 when he hit Conquerer)? How impressive is that really?

I think it shows that he very likely understood the system very well coming into it. I sincerely doubt he's truly a new player. Call me cynical but that's how I see it. I

Congrats anyhow though. Certainly reaching number 1 is in and of itself an accomplishment.

Posted: **Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:54 am**

ViperOverLord wrote:I think it shows that he very likely understood the system very well coming into it. I sincerely doubt he's truly a new player. Call me cynical but that's how I see it.

With that opportunity I 'll tell you 2 funny things.

1) The mc05025 is a code at my university. I put that as user-name because I am using that when I make new accounts to random sites in order to remember it

2) At my first game I lost because I missed too many turns and during my first games someone told me to join the society of cooks in order to get better and he tagged me as 'clueless'

(the tag is still there)

Posted: **Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:22 am**

mc05025 wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:I think it shows that he very likely understood the system very well coming into it. I sincerely doubt he's truly a new player. Call me cynical but that's how I see it.

With that opportunity I 'll tell you 2 funny things.

1) The mc05025 is a code at my university. I put that as user-name because I am using that when I make new accounts to random sites in order to remember it

2) At my first game I lost because I missed too many turns and during my first games someone told me to join the society of cooks in order to get better and he tagged me as 'clueless' (the tag is still there)

Well if my 'conspiracy theory' is wrong then so be it. I still give you props for reaching the top.

Posted: **Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:29 am**

ViperOverLord wrote:

But only 52 percent in 267 games (roughly 240 or 250 when he hit Conquerer)? How impressive is that really?

When you put that into perspective, and see that he mostly play 8 player games, 52 percent is really good.

Posted: **Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:51 am**

QoH wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:

But only 52 percent in 267 games (roughly 240 or 250 when he hit Conquerer)? How impressive is that really?

When you put that into perspective, and see that he mostly play 8 player games, 52 percent is really good.

Good call. He is 65 percent 1 v 1 too.

Posted: **Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:57 pm**

After my first game with Mc05025 (he had about 60 finished games and Captain rank),I told my friends:
"This guy is better player than me(I was Brigadier at that moment).He just need a little more experience.
You will see,he will become a Conqueror in a very short time."
So,I was right =D>