Conquer Club

alstergren wrote:

jefjef wrote:Anyone who is familiar with CC would be very aware that with a huge number of active games many turns would be missed, play would be sloppy and lots of games and points would be lost.

He would have had to have about 10 active sitters to reasonably cover them all.

LOL. To the contrary I would say. First time anyone so royally screwed up this kind of challenge.

LOL. Might be the 1st time the losses were to this degree but it is also the 1st time this number of games were involved with so few sitters.

Hes already an admitted multi apparently back here by paying in full for an account. Seems clear to me that its time to say bye bye.

lokisgal wrote:Hes already an admitted multi apparently back here by paying in full for an account. Seems clear to me that its time to say bye bye.

+1
/

My God...I'm so sick of taking his turns already. Can we just cancel all the games he's in?

jefjef wrote:Anyone who is familiar with CC would be very aware that with a huge number of active games many turns would be missed, play would be sloppy and lots of games and points would be lost.

He would have had to have about 10 active sitters to reasonably cover them all.

well he did have some sitters i know of 3 so far.

aog
lfaw
joshyboy.

and i think there was a few more that i have heard of. As to the point of should the players that gained be punished no they should not. they joined these games to help him break a record, there was a thread and if you notice he did not start missing any turns till he had broke the record. So nobody expected this to happen.

just bann his ass no questions asked.... buddy got banned so why shouldn't his ass get banned... if he dont get banend im not paying again to renewmy sub as it shows that thier is favorates being played

well i only know that in 5 games with theherkman i will gain 0 points, and if they want to take these point from me,i dont mind . Zero point are Zero points. If you take nothing,you will give back nothing. For me these is not point dumping,because i get nothing. lol

he may not be dumping anything on you.... but that is because he has already lost 2600 points

it shows hes online now, but will he take his turn in my game that he joined? Pretty sure he wont. What an ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

he took a couple turns in my games... he has quite a few to go through if he is going to

its not him, its someone from hong kong.

thats pleasant

how is he still in games when his account says for user groups he is in the guest user group

ltndvm wrote:it shows hes online now, but will he take his turn in my game that he joined? Pretty sure he wont. What an ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's actually the problem, in my opinion - now that he's a cook-almost-zero-points, he IS taking his turns.

the problemstill continues to be he is in teh guest user group meaning banned... how is he still in games

basic_man2010_20 wrote:the problemstill continues to be he is in teh guest user group meaning banned... how is he still in games

I don't believe that is the case at all, no. I believe one can be in the Guests user group and still be able to play games. I seem to recall someone being forum-banned, which put them in the Guests user group, but still playing games.

He took the turns on the WWII poland games I'm playing with him

Give the guy a break...he's NOT the Messiah, he's just a naughty boy!!!...Seriously every village needs an idiot and he's a lot more innocuous than many on here who fancy themselves as the best thing since sliced bread...

DJPatrick wrote:Give the guy a break...he's NOT the Messiah, he's just a naughty boy!!!...Seriously every village needs an idiot and he's a lot more innocuous than many on here who fancy themselves as the best thing since sliced bread...

Do you consider 300+ multis to be innocuous? That is his own claim, whether it's true or not.

Woodruff wrote:

DJPatrick wrote:Give the guy a break...he's NOT the Messiah, he's just a naughty boy!!!...Seriously every village needs an idiot and he's a lot more innocuous than many on here who fancy themselves as the best thing since sliced bread...

Do you consider 300+ multis to be innocuous? That is his own claim, whether it's true or not.

When did he say that?

ljex wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

DJPatrick wrote:Give the guy a break...he's NOT the Messiah, he's just a naughty boy!!!...Seriously every village needs an idiot and he's a lot more innocuous than many on here who fancy themselves as the best thing since sliced bread...

Do you consider 300+ multis to be innocuous? That is his own claim, whether it's true or not.

When did he say that?

Go to his profile. In his signature, click on the link that says "click that picture" or something like that. He's essentially declaring it while simultaneously attempting to stuff it in Andy's face.

Woodruff wrote:

ljex wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

DJPatrick wrote:Give the guy a break...he's NOT the Messiah, he's just a naughty boy!!!...Seriously every village needs an idiot and he's a lot more innocuous than many on here who fancy themselves as the best thing since sliced bread...

Do you consider 300+ multis to be innocuous? That is his own claim, whether it's true or not.

When did he say that?

Go to his profile. In his signature, click on the link that says "click that picture" or something like that. He's essentially declaring it while simultaneously attempting to stuff it in Andy's face.

I don't think thats what it means woodruff.

It looks like he is stating how many freemiuns it would take to play all the games he started for this challenge, and how much money the site would have got if they all went premium.

what i was told in live chat yesterday is that they have guested him to prevent him from joining or starting any new games while they work out what to do with him. letting his present games to play out.

I would suggest they change his password for a few days, but let AOG have it for his team games only.

Once all the games have washed through, put in a points reset to 1000 points so the first few players he takes on don't get shafted by a low-points cook.

This would actually be pretty lenient when some would like him banned. On the face of it, it looks like his intention was to make a big noise to annoy the mods (there was no effort to break the record and I don't buy the BS about car crashes or the cat eating his laptop or whatever it was) as per the events below:

Thursday night / Friday - joins 1000 games; takes a few turns in games where he has a good drop but gets nowhere near through his backlog.
Saturday - misses the vast majority of games, but still manages to take 2nd turns in a few games and manages to join another 300 as well as posting in the forums.
Sunday and Monday - takes no turns until he is a cook with a 30 score
Monday night - starts taking turns in (all?) games again

At the moment there seem to be a handful of people who have stated on his wall or in threads that they have taken some turns 'to help out', but no-one is declaring in game chat. There is some doubt that all this lies at herkman's door as some of his forum activity could have been sitters.

We're at a stage where no individual opponent will pick up significant points from the guy, but counterwise some could lose a chunk where he (or somebody) was taking turns in selective games on days 1 and 2 and is back taking turns now.

Removing his access until he has a clean slate would just allow the issues to wash out without aggrieving anyone further. After a reset its up to him if he wants to play with some dignity in future.

padsta wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

ljex wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

DJPatrick wrote:Give the guy a break...he's NOT the Messiah, he's just a naughty boy!!!...Seriously every village needs an idiot and he's a lot more innocuous than many on here who fancy themselves as the best thing since sliced bread...

Do you consider 300+ multis to be innocuous? That is his own claim, whether it's true or not.

When did he say that?

Go to his profile. In his signature, click on the link that says "click that picture" or something like that. He's essentially declaring it while simultaneously attempting to stuff it in Andy's face.

I don't think thats what it means woodruff.
It looks like he is stating how many freemiuns it would take to play all the games he started for this challenge, and how much money the site would have got if they all went premium.

That's a possibility, so let's examine it for a moment. If what you say is true, then what is the logic behind "if they all went premium"? How is the number of premiums necessary to play those games relevant to the money the site would make from that number of freemiums going to premium? Particularly given his statement that "x is money that CC will never get". Along with that, how would that be relevant to the two statements directly against Andy?

What's the rationale for him to tie all of those together, if not also stuffing the fact that he has that many multis into Andy's face?