Page 2 of 3
r
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:31 pm
by naktay01
thanks backglass I missed that one
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:00 pm
by AAFitz
actually, i hate to ask too, but i defended this guy profusely, mostly because i assumed anyone with that name would never disgrace it by cheating, and also because hes played so many games in here, and knows the way cheating is viewed...
his only explaination is in his feedback, so i dont know what to believe...
Medal, can you clear this up for us...explain or apollogize no one knows what to think
we dont want to call you a cheater if you didnt cheat...but i dont want to play you if you did....mostly because the extent of it was so large...
clearly there were multiple accounts...many points were transferred...if my friends did that, i would be pissed...i would appologize to everyone...i would demand the points be taken away because they were not earned...i would beg everyones forgiveness for letting it happen
and if i sunk low enough to allow myself to cheat, knowing how everyone views it in here, i would appologize to all, especially those who defended me when accused...i sure as hell wouldnt be silent and act as if it didnt matter...
medal, if you are innocent, can you please explain...i would have a much better feeling about this place if you did....
but there is nothing ...two lines on a feedback...
what are we supposed to think here
someone help me out with this, please..
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:05 pm
by wicked
umm AA, if he's been busted, he IS a cheater.
cheating
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:36 pm
by steelplayin
If lack can veto and kick him off, why doesn't he? at the very least strip him of a rank that was attained with the multi accounts...something has to be done,or no one will respect the rankings or the Mods for doing nothing, it even encourages those who are lower rank to cheat....why not? if the penalty is just to be called out-If this guy gets away with this, I wont renew my membership either-its only twenty dollars, but this will have a domino effect-why is it taking so long to determine a punishment?
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:44 pm
by wicked
wow, have some patience. we're looking into what to do. we're not making rash overnight decisions, ok? there's a lot to look into, including future ramifications.
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:53 pm
by steelplayin
well,at least that response was fast
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:54 pm
by Backglass
wicked wrote:wow, have some patience. we're looking into what to do. we're not making rash overnight decisions, ok? there's a lot to look into, including future ramifications.
Hey Wicked,
I undertand what you are saying but I am curious. How is this different from any other multi scenario?
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:00 pm
by wicked
uhh, the multi has already been busted. what do you mean?
we're looking into possibly changing the punishment for all future multis.
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:23 pm
by salr15
That's....wicked.
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:19 pm
by naktay01
thanks wicked, I did not know about the bust. Thank you for clearing it up
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:15 pm
by AAFitz
sorry wicked,
i guess i was more asking medal if he set up his multis, or someone else did
wow that took a lot less words...
fitz
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:18 pm
by wicked
you mean like a split personality? lol
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:32 pm
by Backglass
wicked wrote:uhh, the multi has already been busted. what do you mean?
we're looking into possibly changing the punishment for all future multis.
I see...I was under the impression that although he was busted, punishment was yet to be determined.
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:34 pm
by reverend_kyle
Is punishment why dminus is still pending?
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:57 pm
by wicked
Backglass wrote:wicked wrote:uhh, the multi has already been busted. what do you mean?
we're looking into possibly changing the punishment for all future multis.
I see...I was under the impression that although he was busted, punishment was yet to be determined.
have I said anything to the contrary?
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 6:13 pm
by Molacole
I've played with medal a bunch of times and I don't think he needs to cheat... not saying he didn't, but I just don't think he needed to if he did.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:49 pm
by LetGodSortThem
Molacole wrote:I've played with medal a bunch of times and I don't think he needs to cheat... not saying he didn't, but I just don't think he needed to if he did.
You think wrong...
Have you looked at his games?...Thought not
really not Rocket Science kinda bust...
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:57 pm
by LetGodSortThem
reverend_kyle wrote:Is punishment why dminus is still pending?
Rev i think dminus has bailed on site...
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:41 am
by dugcarr1
let the paying members all vote
Re: g
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:43 am
by Oz314
Backglass wrote:naktay01 wrote:Has Medalofhonor even been busted for being a multi? Maybe I've missed the post but I don't see it anywhere.
Andy said in
THIS THREAD.
AndyDufresne wrote:However though; a few days ago we have BUSTED MedalOfHonor, bigass1243, chris457458, diddle shit, taylor8484, wtf, yo for multiple accounts.
Due to MedalofHonor's premium membership, his account will remain unless he is convicted of multiple accounts once more (or a lack veto to remove him from the site).
I didn't notice this either, mostly because the SUBJECT line of that same thread clearly states: MedalOfHonor [Cleared].
This should be changed for those of us that only scan the topics for the word "busted"... I don't read every cheater thread, but I like to keep my ignore list up to date with all the cheaters.
Obfuscating it like this looks like favoritism to Medal of [dis]Honor. Broadcast his guilt properly, please.
Re: g
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:16 pm
by sully800
Oz314 wrote:Backglass wrote:naktay01 wrote:Has Medalofhonor even been busted for being a multi? Maybe I've missed the post but I don't see it anywhere.
Andy said in
THIS THREAD.
AndyDufresne wrote:However though; a few days ago we have BUSTED MedalOfHonor, bigass1243, chris457458, diddle shit, taylor8484, wtf, yo for multiple accounts.
Due to MedalofHonor's premium membership, his account will remain unless he is convicted of multiple accounts once more (or a lack veto to remove him from the site).
I didn't notice this either, mostly because the SUBJECT line of that same thread clearly states: MedalOfHonor [Cleared].
This should be changed for those of us that only scan the topics for the word "busted"... I don't read every cheater thread, but I like to keep my ignore list up to date with all the cheaters.
Obfuscating it like this looks like favoritism to Medal of [dis]Honor. Broadcast his guilt properly, please.
That's because the accounts listed in that thread were not multis with Medalofhonor. So when it was investigated he was found to be clear.
Then after that Medal became suspicious with his actual multis and was busted at a later date. I still think it should say BUSTED above one of the threads, perhaps the original accusation thread that was locked.
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:44 pm
by reverend_kyle
I did my part.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:30 am
by JOHNNYROCKET24
is he officialy busted now?
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:43 pm
by Molacole
LetGodSortThem wrote:Molacole wrote:I've played with medal a bunch of times and I don't think he needs to cheat... not saying he didn't, but I just don't think he needed to if he did.
You think wrong...
Have you looked at his games?...Thought not
really not Rocket Science kinda bust...
all I was implying was that all the games I have played in, with him on my team have been near a 95% win ratio so I honestly didn't think he NEEDED to cheat to gain points. That's all... I didn't bother looking at the games he was accused of because the mods are handling it and what they say goes...
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:18 am
by reverend_kyle
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:is he officialy busted now?
He has been for a while, they just never posted it in the subject of the original now locked thread.