Conquer Club

Mr_Adams wrote:this thread has been easily surpased by Spamalot's thread, and is being crept up on by king of the hill. the name needs to be changed to "second longest thread in CC, soon to be third"

Then this wouldn't be the longest thread, thread.

I vote the name stays.

Mr. A, the title of this thread isn't describing what it is, it's describing what it has the potential to be.

areyouincahoots wrote:

Mr_Adams wrote:this thread has been easily surpassed by Spamalot's thread, and is being crept up on by king of the hill. the name needs to be changed to "second longest thread in CC, soon to be third"

And he leaps upon the obvious with a sense of new discovery...

actually I've said this a few dozen times since spamalot surpassed this thread in length.

apey wrote:He is a little slow forgive him

hey MrA second round dodgers suck

Dodgers DO suck. Diamondbacks have kicked their asses on countless occasions. so am I missing your attempt to spark some sort of argument?

I missed this thread.

Now I can hug it.

Mr_Adams wrote:

areyouincahoots wrote:

Mr_Adams wrote:this thread has been easily surpassed by Spamalot's thread, and is being crept up on by king of the hill. the name needs to be changed to "second longest thread in CC, soon to be third"

And he leaps upon the obvious with a sense of new discovery...

actually I've said this a few dozen times since spamalot surpassed this thread in length.

You have and each time we've given you a reason why the name should stay the same and you either didn't see it or chose to ignore it. While I thank you for your contribution to the length of this thread, it's getting old and annoying.

The thread is called the Longest thread, Thread because we are trying to make it the longest thread not because it is the longest thread. Secondly, Comment on the Avatar above you is closer to passing this thread in length than King of the Hill. Finally, neither of those threads are going to catch up to this thread, especially not any time soon.

strike wolf wrote:Looks at thread. Well, it's good progress but certainly you guys could have done better while I was gone.

I could say the same about you.

autoload wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Looks at thread. Well, it's good progress but certainly you guys could have done better while I was gone.

I could say the same about you.

Then why don't you?

mo

I want pie!

Snowpepsi wrote:

diddle wrote:

autoload wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Looks at thread. Well, it's good progress but certainly you guys could have done better while I was gone.

I could say the same about you.

Then why don't you?

I'll say it for him.


"The same about you."

Read that again, you screwed up.

no

Well, this thread hasn't moved much today. Pick up the pace.

strike wolf wrote:Well, this thread hasn't moved much today. Pick up the pace.

I would but I don't like to double post.

You shouldn't double post unless you have something to say about multiple topics (especially if you respond to one of the topics and then see the other) or if you're trying to bump the thread. We just can't bump the thread every ten minutes though. Then it would get out of hand.

strike wolf wrote:You shouldn't double post unless you have something to say about multiple topics (especially if you respond to one of the topics and then see the other) or if you're trying to bump the thread. We just can't bump the thread every ten minutes though. Then it would get out of hand.

The only way I would have something to say about other topics is if I actually went back and read all the comments. Have you seen how many pages I would have to read? This thread is Huge.

Bump.

Snowpepsi wrote:

strike wolf wrote:You shouldn't double post unless you have something to say about multiple topics (especially if you respond to one of the topics and then see the other) or if you're trying to bump the thread. We just can't bump the thread every ten minutes though. Then it would get out of hand.

The only way I would have something to say about other topics is if I actually went back and read all the comments. Have you seen how many pages I would have to read? This thread is Huge.

It usually happens if you've been gone for a while and you read back over the pages you missed. Usually this relates to me when I've been gone 2-3 days, occasionally longer.

And Hecter, nice way to abuse the bump. I'll give you 9 out of 10 for timing. However, over all, you get 6 out of 10 for being predictable.

How is everybody anyways?

I want cookies

what kind of cookie?

I'm fairly torn when it comes to this thread. Part of me wants so badly to stay committed...the other part of me doesn't see the point. What keeps me around is the memory of the "glory days" when people actually had something interesting to say, and the regulars had, if nothing else, witty remarks to make at each others expense. I suppose I will stay as committed as I can until I lose interest completely.

Someone has to help Andy represent the FPC!

strike wolf wrote:what kind of cookie?

chocolate chip

areyouincahoots wrote:I'm fairly torn when it comes to this thread. Part of me wants so badly to stay committed...the other part of me doesn't see the point. What keeps me around is the memory of the "glory days" when people actually had something interesting to say, and the regulars had, if nothing else, witty remarks to make at each others expense. I suppose I will stay as committed as I can until I lose interest completely.

Someone has to help Andy represent the FPC!

FPC?

I'm pretty sure it's 500 Page Crew..

diddle wrote:

areyouincahoots wrote:I'm fairly torn when it comes to this thread. Part of me wants so badly to stay committed...the other part of me doesn't see the point. What keeps me around is the memory of the "glory days" when people actually had something interesting to say, and the regulars had, if nothing else, witty remarks to make at each others expense. I suppose I will stay as committed as I can until I lose interest completely.

Someone has to help Andy represent the FPC!

FPC?

First Page Crew, actually.