Conquer Club

poo-maker wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Top 5 to reach 3.5K the most x

1. Blitzaholic.......................... 15
2. Prankcall............................. 6
3. JR..........................................4
3. Sjnap....................................4
5. Comic boy............................ 3


x5

and heres the game number so Dim and SkyT can see its not against cooks.

Game 1469108

Lol, i'm not even on the list!

this list kind of rewards losing points more than wining them... holding it and not losing disqualifies you from contention in this particular arena

not to say its easy to gain it back, which is why the list is there.... its one thing to hit it once, another to keep at it

AAFitz wrote:

poo-maker wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Top 5 to reach 3.5K the most x

1. Blitzaholic.......................... 15
2. Prankcall............................. 6
3. JR..........................................4
3. Sjnap....................................4
5. Comic boy............................ 3


x5

and heres the game number so Dim and SkyT can see its not against cooks.

Game 1469108

Lol, i'm not even on the list!

this list kind of rewards losing points more than wining them... holding it and not losing disqualifies you from contention in this particular arena

not to say its easy to gain it back, which is why the list is there.... its one thing to hit it once, another to keep at it

well spoken aa, and poo u never hit 3.5K several times, maybe once or twice and just kept shooting up


you can drop back thought if you like and hit it again a few times, i gladly add you, lmaoff

Robinette wrote:

Warsteiner wrote:3 Warsteiner 3871

fit me in on spot 5 all time topscore

say please

lol robin, lol, be nice

Top 5 winning % min. 1000 games

1. SkyT.......................78%
2. Big Yuma Ripper.... 75%
2. Alstergren............. 75%
4. Blitzaholic..............74%
4. Juventino...............74%



JOHNNYROCKET24 3541 6453 4744 (74%) Brigadier 460-13

89 AAFitz 2513 2614 1424 (54%) Major 300-2 United States United States

I hit 300, though i havent checked that category, for all i know im the 20th to do so.

AAFitz wrote:89 AAFitz 2513 2614 1424 (54%) Major 300-2 United States United States

I hit 300, though i havent checked that category, for all i know im the 20th to do so.

Nothing against AA or anyone else with a huge amount of feedbacks but I think a better way of judging feedbacks is your games to feedback ratio as obviously the more games you play the weaker your ratio.

JR is a good example of what i am talking about - he has 461 positive feedbacks which I believe is the highest on the site however he has played 6469 games so his ratio is 14:1 ie he gets 1 positive feedback for every 14 games he plays - I suspect if you compare this to others it is about average. In AA's case above his ratio is far more impressive at 8.4:1 ie he gets a positive feedback in every 8.4 games. I currently have 68 positive feedbacks and have played 589 games so my ratio is currently 8.7:1. Worse than AA's but considerably better than JR's I genuinely believe this is a much better indicator of feedbacks as distinct from total numbers.

Fircoal wrote:Blitz, maybe a top 5 of BR games played?

do you have a list who has played the most?

Blitzaholic wrote:poo-maker see-sawing for #1 with sky for weeks, finally claimed it on 12-29-07 and has not looked back yet.

as far as i know 11 days and counting

rebelman wrote:

AAFitz wrote:89 AAFitz 2513 2614 1424 (54%) Major 300-2 United States United States

I hit 300, though i havent checked that category, for all i know im the 20th to do so.

Nothing against AA or anyone else with a huge amount of feedbacks but I think a better way of judging feedbacks is your games to feedback ratio as obviously the more games you play the weaker your ratio.

JR is a good example of what i am talking about - he has 461 positive feedbacks which I believe is the highest on the site however he has played 6469 games so his ratio is 14:1 ie he gets 1 positive feedback for every 14 games he plays - I suspect if you compare this to others it is about average. In AA's case above his ratio is far more impressive at 8.4:1 ie he gets a positive feedback in every 8.4 games. I currently have 68 positive feedbacks and have played 589 games so my ratio is currently 8.7:1. Worse than AA's but considerably better than JR's I genuinely believe this is a much better indicator of feedbacks as distinct from total numbers.

part of what you are saying is true, but to JRs credit, he has played 3000 games more than me...so youd expect more negatives.. and technically ive been given more negatives, but ive worked them out with the players... or on occasion had the bogus one removed..lol...

right now one of mine is a joke, and the other I could have had removed by simply removing my neutral that I gave to The Zsar for having his "housemate" clear the board for him. I prefer to leave it there though. The irony of course was that the feedback was left by his housemate in retribution for me leaving The Zsar a neutral suggesting an obvious alliance. I dont think he was bright enough to see why I thanked him for the negative, when I got it...

Feedback is a function of the number of games, activity in the chat, skill, some luck(playing those that give them), and of how many you give out...which on my end I may have left the most on the site... certainly it has to be close.

Going by the number strictly in any case is pointless... reading what a few of the people have to say is far more informative than how many they recieved. Also, they tend to be exponential... if a player sees 15 negs, they will be far more inclined to leave another.. whereas if a player only has one or two, they know it better be a real good complaint, because many will read it

Used properly it is a nice way to keep people in check though. You just have to weigh them accordingly, much like any statistic

rebelman wrote:

AAFitz wrote:89 AAFitz 2513 2614 1424 (54%) Major 300-2 United States United States

I hit 300, though i havent checked that category, for all i know im the 20th to do so.

Nothing against AA or anyone else with a huge amount of feedbacks but I think a better way of judging feedbacks is your games to feedback ratio as obviously the more games you play the weaker your ratio.

JR is a good example of what i am talking about - he has 461 positive feedbacks which I believe is the highest on the site however he has played 6469 games so his ratio is 14:1 ie he gets 1 positive feedback for every 14 games he plays - I suspect if you compare this to others it is about average. In AA's case above his ratio is far more impressive at 8.4:1 ie he gets a positive feedback in every 8.4 games. I currently have 68 positive feedbacks and have played 589 games so my ratio is currently 8.7:1. Worse than AA's but considerably better than JR's I genuinely believe this is a much better indicator of feedbacks as distinct from total numbers.

Cool, I'm sitting on 8.7:1 as well.

I agree with AAfitz...the reasons positive feedback should be given out is for being friendly or skilled. Positive feedback should not be given in return to someone just because they gave you one, but thats a natural reaction for most players I think. I'd say that those two factors form the rate at which you get feedbacks and then the more games you play the more you get.

sully800 wrote:

rebelman wrote:

AAFitz wrote:89 AAFitz 2513 2614 1424 (54%) Major 300-2 United States United States

I hit 300, though i havent checked that category, for all i know im the 20th to do so.

Nothing against AA or anyone else with a huge amount of feedbacks but I think a better way of judging feedbacks is your games to feedback ratio as obviously the more games you play the weaker your ratio.

JR is a good example of what i am talking about - he has 461 positive feedbacks which I believe is the highest on the site however he has played 6469 games so his ratio is 14:1 ie he gets 1 positive feedback for every 14 games he plays - I suspect if you compare this to others it is about average. In AA's case above his ratio is far more impressive at 8.4:1 ie he gets a positive feedback in every 8.4 games. I currently have 68 positive feedbacks and have played 589 games so my ratio is currently 8.7:1. Worse than AA's but considerably better than JR's I genuinely believe this is a much better indicator of feedbacks as distinct from total numbers.

Cool, I'm sitting on 8.7:1 as well.

I agree with AAfitz...the reasons positive feedback should be given out is for being friendly or skilled. Positive feedback should not be given in return to someone just because they gave you one, but thats a natural reaction for most players I think. I'd say that those two factors form the rate at which you get feedbacks and then the more games you play the more you get.

another point to take into consideration is: how many feedback you have written.

Because lets face it. If you write alot of friendly feedbacks you are likey to get one back.

sully800 wrote:

rebelman wrote:

AAFitz wrote:89 AAFitz 2513 2614 1424 (54%) Major 300-2 United States United States

I hit 300, though i havent checked that category, for all i know im the 20th to do so.

Nothing against AA or anyone else with a huge amount of feedbacks but I think a better way of judging feedbacks is your games to feedback ratio as obviously the more games you play the weaker your ratio.

JR is a good example of what i am talking about - he has 461 positive feedbacks which I believe is the highest on the site however he has played 6469 games so his ratio is 14:1 ie he gets 1 positive feedback for every 14 games he plays - I suspect if you compare this to others it is about average. In AA's case above his ratio is far more impressive at 8.4:1 ie he gets a positive feedback in every 8.4 games. I currently have 68 positive feedbacks and have played 589 games so my ratio is currently 8.7:1. Worse than AA's but considerably better than JR's I genuinely believe this is a much better indicator of feedbacks as distinct from total numbers.

Cool, I'm sitting on 8.7:1 as well.

I agree with AAfitz...the reasons positive feedback should be given out is for being friendly or skilled. Positive feedback should not be given in return to someone just because they gave you one, but thats a natural reaction for most players I think. I'd say that those two factors form the rate at which you get feedbacks and then the more games you play the more you get.

updated you aafitz and jr and all else that posted in here


and sully, be nice if you could find a top 10 feedback ratio and post stats in here? like you said you at 8.7:1 od we have 9 others? or me post you some name,s could you factor and post the numbers in here?

i have 3093 games and 343 positive feedbacks and maybe only left 40 to 50 positives to others, what is my ratio?



9 to 1 maybe?

I've reached Brigadier 8x now..Thx sir

1st 5 to 4K

1. blitz
2. poo
3. sky
4. ?
5. ?



who will be the next 2 to get 4K?


warsteiner
comic boy
dbandit
mm17
keyborn
jr
big whiskey
scott-land
prankcall
alikaber
genghis khan ca
someone else
no one else

Top 5 to reach 3.5K the most x

1. Blitzaholic.......................... 15
2. Prankcall............................. 8
3. JR..........................................4
3. Sjnap....................................4
5. Comic boy............................ 3


x6

you missed x5 back on page 63

I think warsteiner will be the next one to reach 4000 (and conqueror)
prankcall will be the next one to reach 4000 after warsteiner

TOP 5 Maps played-most pages update

1. classic 4933

2. world 2.1 607

3. doodle earth 588

4. british isles 519

5. usa 421



others

middle earth 329
europe 301
aussie 196
age of realms-might 178
north america 175
alex empire 174
africa 171
seige 165
ccu 152
asia 151
tamriel 143
canada 142








like it or not doodle earth and age of realms-might are skyrocketing


the stats dont lie

sully800 wrote:wicked...................1444....2......616.......1531
Sully800..................225....50.....9358.....1645
JOHNNYROCKET24.......3....176...6145.....1651
lackattack..............1616....51..........3.....1871
Blitzaholic.................23.....92.....14934...2350

Thats the top 5 with scores from the other day. This will need to be updated once in a while, especially for the low ranked people because a change of 100 points in their score makes a huge difference in rank.

6-10 without all the numbers are:
AK_iceman........2423
Reverend_kyle...2625
Twill..................2698
Fircoal................4026
AndyDufresne.....6882

added sully, thank you, robinette must be close to top 10 or 15?

Blitzaholic wrote:1st 5 to 4K

1. blitz
2. poo
3. sky
4. ?
5. ?



who will be the next 2 to get 4K?


warsteiner
comic boy
dbandit
mm17
keyborn
jr
big whiskey
scott-land
prankcall
alikaber
genghis khan ca
someone else
no one else

i will guess warsteiner and jr or prankcall

I went downstairs to get some drink, saw a friend of mine pass by went outside to talk to him and forgot a game, lost 68 points

that kind-of dropped my motivation tbh :p

Warsteiner wrote:I went downstairs to get some drink, saw a friend of mine pass by went outside to talk to him and forgot a game, lost 68 points

and the funniest thing is that you had that game in the bag.

game chat wrote:2008-01-10 01:03:24 - burritohunk: GG
2008-01-10 01:03:26 - burritohunk: I LOST

game log wrote:2008-01-10 01:24:49 - Warsteiner was kicked out for missing too many turns
2008-01-10 01:24:49 - burritohunk won the game
2008-01-10 01:24:49 - Warsteiner loses 68 points
2008-01-10 01:24:49 - burritohunk gains 68 points

ye kind of bad :p only needed one turn

don't worry points come and go. skill remains. you'll get those points back.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?gam ... 3#map-cell

bah, deadbeated....7mins too late :'( Record-breaking game is over i guess

544 rounds - ended