Page 10 of 10
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:28 am
by notyou2
MeDeFe wrote:Phatscotty wrote:it is newsworthy. I made no comments
Yes, you did.
Phatscotty wrote:It seems, with strong bipartisan requests from Congress, as well as independant NY mayor, that the Obama admin. may reverse its decision on a civilian trial after all, considering KSM. Eric Holder and President Obama, meet reality. Yes, you actually were out of your fucking minds afterall...
I think he was speaking from the other side of his mouth, so it doesn't count, or actually, typing with the left hand while crossing your fingers with the right hand, again, it doesn't count.
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:29 pm
by Phatscotty
notyou2 wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Phatscotty wrote:it is newsworthy. I made no comments
Yes, you did.
Phatscotty wrote:It seems, with strong bipartisan requests from Congress, as well as independant NY mayor, that the Obama admin. may reverse its decision on a civilian trial after all, considering KSM. Eric Holder and President Obama, meet reality. Yes, you actually were out of your fucking minds afterall...
I think he was speaking from the other side of his mouth, so it doesn't count, or actually, typing with the left hand while crossing your fingers with the right hand, again, it doesn't count.
my comment on the 9-11 trial, is a separate post from the link I shared about Bin Laden, you idiot
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:36 pm
by Phatscotty
radiojake wrote:Phatscotty wrote:(CNN) -- A new audio tape allegedly from al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden claims responsibility for an attempt to blow up a plane en route to Michigan on Christmas Day and warns the United States of more attacks.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/01/24/bin.la ... tml?hpt=T2
I highlighted a word for you to take note of - There is a much chance this tape is from Bin Ladin as it is from anyone who gains to profit from this never ending war of terror (they are both as likely as each other)
The whole concept of a war on a non physical entity is ridiculous -
Bush told us that the terrorists hate us because apparently the west stands for 'freedom, liberty and democracy' - Are they still going to hate us when all of those things are taken from us under the guise of fighting terrorism? -
For a country who is instinctivly ultra paranoid about everything their government does (
you don't want them taking healthcare, because it will give them too much power - you don't want them running social services, because it will give them too much power) you seem mighty quick to bend over and let your government ram a whole lot of bullshit rhetoric up your ass under the guise of 'protecting' you all from 'terrorism' - It's like you don't trust them unless they are blowing the crap out of another country
In bold, a few things for you
#1 well, if you are listening to what Bush said, and take it literally, and base your argument on a soundbite designed for the sheeple, well.....
#2 It's called freedom. you should check it out sometime
Obama's decision to move the 9-11 trials to NY will go down as THEE DUMBEST move by a president in US history. You picked your side, it was the retarded choice as usual, and as soon as Obama is done reversing his severely misguided decision with the justice department (very soon my dear troll) your failures will be complete.
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:51 pm
by Phatscotty
Democratic Senator Webb
on the handling of the Nigerian bomber...
We all know this was a mistake. The people know it was a mistake, the congress knows it was a mistake, and the president should recognize it was a mistake.
Holy shit, was that Diane Feinstein standing behind him?
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:12 pm
by notyou2
3 posts in a row Phatty.....you arguing with yourself now?
Who's winning?
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:25 pm
by Phatscotty
notyou2 wrote:3 posts in a row Phatty.....you arguing with yourself now?
Who's winning?
just keeping track of the developements. Being the author of the thread, it is my duty to keep some facts coming in as the case evolves, and will surely evolve even more in the near future. Then Ill probably be throwing Holder quotes admitting his mistakes and/or stepping down altogether. in the near future, check back, I will have them.
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:46 pm
by notyou2
Phatscotty wrote:notyou2 wrote:3 posts in a row Phatty.....you arguing with yourself now?
Who's winning?
just keeping track of the developements. Being the author of the thread, it is my duty to keep some facts coming in as the case evolves, and will surely evolve even more in the near future.
Then Ill probably be throwing Holder quotes admitting his mistakes and/or
stepping down altogether. in the near future, check back, I will have them.
Phatty, your stepping down from your self appointed position of superior pollster of the high intellect representing the might is right right??????
I'm phlabergasted!!!!
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:52 pm
by Phatscotty
notyou2 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:notyou2 wrote:3 posts in a row Phatty.....you arguing with yourself now?
Who's winning?
just keeping track of the developements. Being the author of the thread, it is my duty to keep some facts coming in as the case evolves, and will surely evolve even more in the near future.
Then Ill probably be throwing Holder quotes admitting his mistakes and/or
stepping down altogether. in the near future, check back, I will have them.
Phatty, your stepping down from your self appointed position of superior pollster of the high intellect representing the might is right right??????
I'm phlabergasted!!!!
and trolling
Re: Poll on Christmas Bomber
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:54 pm
by notyou2
I am simply asking a question on what you wrote.